PPV Quality as of December 2010

Uban · 12-09-2010, 11:46 AM

Hey all,

I'm sure the quality of traffic between PPV's can shift from month to month as they probably share it.

Any opinions on who has the best right now? Between LI and MT, which would you focus most on right now?

Thanks.

ben565 · 12-09-2010, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uban

Hey all,

I'm sure the quality of traffic between PPV's can shift from month to month as they probably share it.

Any opinions on who has the best right now? Between LI and MT, which would you focus most on right now?

Thanks.

i only focus on TV & LI ,MT's traffic is good one week and bad the next

mtmjohn · 12-10-2010, 12:09 AM

Trafficvance hands down the best, as usual.

Mike Morgan. · 12-10-2010, 12:39 AM

The quality of MT quality is not as good as it was before .

At the moment , it is better to go with LI .

Mike

ChrisBa · 12-10-2010, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uban

Hey all,

I'm sure the quality of traffic between PPV's can shift from month to month as they probably share it.

Any opinions on who has the best right now? Between LI and MT, which would you focus most on right now?

Thanks.

IMO LT and MT are practically the same, rumor has it they even share traffic.. but as stated above, the best quality by far is trafficvance

bbrock32 · 12-10-2010, 03:28 AM

Traffic Vance still holds the top spot in terms of quality. Too bad that competition is getting insane there...

harro1 · 12-10-2010, 06:57 AM

Quality of TV might be good but bids are too high to make much profits.

KevScarb · 12-11-2010, 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtmjohn

Trafficvance hands down the best, as usual.

100% Agree with that. The others are not in the same league.

don21stc · 12-13-2010, 12:40 AM

Hi, Totally new to ppv but I like the concept because it seems like a cheap way to test a variety of promotional options with plenty of opportunities to hone campaigns that have potential and reject those that are bombing out. But that's just my naive theoretical view - reality is bound to be very different.
But from what I've read so far it seems that great emphasis is put on the network that displays the pop-up or LP. I can understand that if the network doesn't do it's job properly, you're going to miss out but if you select say 500 urls to target and DirectCPV or whoever do their job properly and display your pop-up or LP then the rest is just down to the offer's sales page if you're linking direct.
So it seems to me that the name of the game should be to find urls that get good numbers of visitors who are interested in your offer but nobody else knows about these urls.
That should mean that you can get a rock-bottom price for each view. And surely you can rely on the network to display your pop-up when anyone clicks on any of your urls? Otherwise, the network won't be earning from you.
An answer I got from DirectCPV on my first campaign (last week) when I asked why my response was low said that they share their traffic with other networks and the fact that 99% of the urls I'd selected were in first place with DCPV didn't necessarily mean that they were in THE top spot everywhere.
But I read somewhere else that if you're not in first place, then you won't get any clicks so it seems that you're almost in a no lose situation because you won't be bid into paying high prices for urls that everyone else knows about provided you set a bid limit of say 2% of the offer payout for each url or 20% of the average
epc or some other reasonable maximum.
But as I said above, I've got no practical experience of ppv so my armchair theories are probably completely missing many vital points - so anything to put me straight would be very welcome!!
Thanks,
Don

Firstrate · 12-13-2010, 02:25 AM

Yep still TV for me, closely followed by Lead Impact.

KC-Coop · 12-13-2010, 10:51 AM

I've had most of my success with TV and LI as well. I've never had much luck with MT - so I've focused on TV and LI instead.

Freddie · 12-14-2010, 08:21 AM

After those three - who would be next on the list?

CpvGuru · 12-14-2010, 02:07 PM

TV is lavish if you can get traffic, Direct CPV does OK, I've noticed the conversions really drop off this month while the spend is up? any one else see this?

12-09-2010, 11:46 AM	#1
Uban Warrior Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	PPV Quality as of December 2010 Hey all, I'm sure the quality of traffic between PPV's can shift from month to month as they probably share it. Any opinions on who has the best right now? Between LI and MT, which would you focus most on right now? Thanks.

12-10-2010, 12:09 AM	#3
mtmjohn CPA Networks Reviewer War Room Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Pandora Posts: 3,183 Thanks: 1,352 Thanked 712 Times in 559 Posts Social Networking Contact Info	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 Trafficvance hands down the best, as usual.
	>> Affpaying.com -- 700+ CPA Networks Reviews -- 42,500+ CPA Offers Listed & Compared! << >> Affdaily.com -- Keeps You Updated On The Latest Affiliate Marketing News! -- Fully Customizable! <<

12-10-2010, 12:39 AM	#4
Mike Morgan. Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 2,688 Blog Entries: 42 Thanks: 569 Thanked 827 Times in 274 Posts	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 The quality of MT quality is not as good as it was before . At the moment , it is better to go with LI . Mike
	Copy The Exact Formula I Use to Make $150 Per Day With Amazon - Newbie Friendly ...

12-10-2010, 03:28 AM	#6
bbrock32 HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 159 Thanks: 1 Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 Traffic Vance still holds the top spot in terms of quality. Too bad that competition is getting insane there...
	-----> AffExpert.com - The Best PPV/PPC Tools Out There!<-----

12-10-2010, 06:57 AM	#7
harro1 Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 736 Thanks: 9 Thanked 38 Times in 37 Posts	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 Quality of TV might be good but bids are too high to make much profits.

12-13-2010, 12:40 AM	#9
don21stc HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Brighton, England Posts: 109 Thanks: 1 Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 Hi, Totally new to ppv but I like the concept because it seems like a cheap way to test a variety of promotional options with plenty of opportunities to hone campaigns that have potential and reject those that are bombing out. But that's just my naive theoretical view - reality is bound to be very different. But from what I've read so far it seems that great emphasis is put on the network that displays the pop-up or LP. I can understand that if the network doesn't do it's job properly, you're going to miss out but if you select say 500 urls to target and DirectCPV or whoever do their job properly and display your pop-up or LP then the rest is just down to the offer's sales page if you're linking direct. So it seems to me that the name of the game should be to find urls that get good numbers of visitors who are interested in your offer but nobody else knows about these urls. That should mean that you can get a rock-bottom price for each view. And surely you can rely on the network to display your pop-up when anyone clicks on any of your urls? Otherwise, the network won't be earning from you. An answer I got from DirectCPV on my first campaign (last week) when I asked why my response was low said that they share their traffic with other networks and the fact that 99% of the urls I'd selected were in first place with DCPV didn't necessarily mean that they were in THE top spot everywhere. But I read somewhere else that if you're not in first place, then you won't get any clicks so it seems that you're almost in a no lose situation because you won't be bid into paying high prices for urls that everyone else knows about provided you set a bid limit of say 2% of the offer payout for each url or 20% of the average epc or some other reasonable maximum. But as I said above, I've got no practical experience of ppv so my armchair theories are probably completely missing many vital points - so anything to put me straight would be very welcome!! Thanks, Don
	Alternative Views on Mind Power and Success

12-13-2010, 02:25 AM	#10
Firstrate Kingpin War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 382 Thanks: 0 Thanked 4,294,967,295 Times in 4,294,967,295 Posts Social Networking	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 Yep still TV for me, closely followed by Lead Impact.

12-13-2010, 10:51 AM	#11
KC-Coop Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 523 Thanks: 2 Thanked 62 Times in 55 Posts Contact Info	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 I've had most of my success with TV and LI as well. I've never had much luck with MT - so I've focused on TV and LI instead.
	Wolf Storm Media CPA Network Weekly Payouts, Free Training, Run by Affiliates For Affiliates Let Us Help You Grow Your Business

12-14-2010, 08:21 AM	#12
Freddie HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Varies by season... Posts: 102 Thanks: 23 Thanked 62 Times in 31 Posts	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 After those three - who would be next on the list?

12-14-2010, 02:07 PM	#13
CpvGuru Active Warrior Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: USA Posts: 44 Thanks: 3 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: PPV Quality as of December 2010 TV is lavish if you can get traffic, Direct CPV does OK, I've noticed the conversions really drop off this month while the spend is up? any one else see this?