15 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
15 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

Do CPA Networks Tell You You're Denied?

by 3000
12 replies
I applied to Adsent Media 2 days ago. They told me they will get back to me within 1-2 business days about my application.

So its been 2 days but still no response. So do they just ignore your application if you didn't make the cut or do they tell you that you didn't make the cut?
#cpa #denied #networks
  • Profile picture of the author imback
    Honestly,

    I would wait a week them give them a ring. Some will tell you and some will not. It is hard to say.

    Good Luck,

    CHAD
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4040169].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ChrisBa
    Originally Posted by 3000 View Post

    I applied to Adsent Media 2 days ago. They told me they will get back to me within 1-2 business days about my application.

    So its been 2 days but still no response. So do they just ignore your application if you didn't make the cut or do they tell you that you didn't make the cut?
    Generally they will.. but like stated above, wait a few more days and give them a call if you don't hear.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4040385].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mahmoud Selman
    Hi 3000,
    I don't think CPA networks will ignore your application just wait a few days as Chad said call the network, that will get you approved faster.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4040388].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author azmanar
      Hi,

      -> Most networks reply in a few hours to a few days.

      -> Some networks won't reply until you contact them.

      -> Some networks won't reply to you at all.


      Best to contact them after submitting your applications.
      Call or send them an email stating that you had just applied.
      Signature
      === >>> Tomorrow Should Be Better Than Today
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4040507].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author shantiz
    It usually depends on how fast they get to your app. Usually the messages that come out when you sign up are automated, CPA networks get a lotta application sign ups, give them a couple days, if not, just speed up the process by hitting them up on AIM directly. GL
    Signature
    RAR Media | Content Locking
    - Low Earnings? Huge Traffic? MAXIMIZE Earnings with RMG
    - 100% Fully Customizable Gateway With CSS
     - High Converting/Top Paying Offers

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4040525].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author 3000
      No worries guys thanks for all your quick responses, they just emailed me I just got excepted!! =)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4041181].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author shantiz
        Originally Posted by 3000 View Post

        No worries guys thanks for all your quick responses, they just emailed me I just got excepted!! =)
        Congrats man, good luck with everything! Profit, Rinse, Repeat
        Signature
        RAR Media | Content Locking
        - Low Earnings? Huge Traffic? MAXIMIZE Earnings with RMG
        - 100% Fully Customizable Gateway With CSS
         - High Converting/Top Paying Offers

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4041319].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Shaz07
          Honestly we get so many applications submitted that it gets very backed up. On top of that every 1 out of 5 applicants is an actual legitimate publisher who is not looking to drive fraudulent traffic, which takes even longer to weed out the honest ones.

          I'm glad you got accepted, but for the future I would wait a week and then email, then go from there.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4042013].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author azmanar
    Hi Shaz,

    What you said surprised me.

    4 of 5 are fraudulent applicants. That's a whopping 80% !

    That is like saying 80% of internet users in the field of Internet Marketing as dirty.
    Never thought it would be so many.

    Can you clarify what constitute as fraudulent applications?

    I bet a lot of people would like to know too.
    Signature
    === >>> Tomorrow Should Be Better Than Today
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4044216].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mtmjohn
      Originally Posted by azmanar View Post

      Hi Shaz,

      What you said surprised me.

      4 of 5 are fraudulent applicants. That's a whopping 80% !

      That is like saying 80% of internet users in the field of Internet Marketing as dirty.
      Never thought it would be so many.

      Can you clarify what constitute as fraudulent applications?

      I bet a lot of people would like to know too.
      That's quite true, azmanar. With so many fraudsters in this industry these days, it has become difficult to identify the legit one from the fakes.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4044349].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author azmanar
        Originally Posted by mtmjohn View Post

        That's quite true, azmanar. With so many fraudsters in this industry these days, it has become difficult to identify the legit one from the fakes.
        Hi John,

        Works both ways - Networks & Publishers.

        Literally shows the entry point and opportunity to defraud people are
        that easy in this industry.

        And at the same time, the escape routes for criminals are so easy
        as well. That's why they are never afraid of hit and run.

        From which we can sum up a few things:
        1. The need for strict filtering system.
        2. The need to be vigilant and be aware of new threats.
        3. Know how to recover and recoup quickly.
        4. Know where to get help.
        5. Gov policies are not reliable.

        There are many cases where Publishers are not compensated
        properly for their efforts. Simply said, DEFRAUDED by Networks.

        Some are tantamount to fraud but unknown to Publishers. An
        example is how certain Biz Opp personalities are offered by Networks.

        They are well known to be con-artistes with so many complaints
        all over the net. But yet, their offers are omnipresent in many
        networks with lucrative payouts. If "tantamount to fraud" is hard
        to digest, then we can put it differently, i.e. the networks' integrity
        is questionable.

        So Publishers must do due diligence of certain networks ahead of
        doing business with them.

        There are places to gather some data for due diligence:
        1. Scam.com
        2. IMreportcards.com
        3. Warrior Forum
        4. DP
        5. Googling.

        It is simply difficult to obtain a remedy after getting scammed.
        What Publishers can do is to prominently highlight about it in popular
        spaces mentioned above or other social places.

        This would be a favour for many, because they prevent others from
        getting defrauded. That would also attract some interest groups,
        including authorities, to take punitive actions.
        Signature
        === >>> Tomorrow Should Be Better Than Today
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4044541].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mikepac
    our system is automated and sends out a deniel email
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4047110].message }}

Trending Topics