Lead Impact vs. Traffic Vance

by 11 comments
If I know right Leadimpact serves popup ads and Traffic Vance serves popunders.

If I had to choose I'd decide to go with popups instead of popunders. Why? Here is my reason: if I target a weight loss product with Leadimpact then the potential customer may buy my product instead of the products on the trigger site because he see my landing page first and engages with it. In the other case, when I would promote the same with Traffic Vance, that potential customer would see the trigger site first and engage with that, buy the product and then visit my site, he wont be interested as he just bough a similar product a minute ago. Am I Right? Or do I see something wrong about it?

I'm asking those people who used both, which one converted better for you? I do pretty well with Leadimpact but I want to scale up my campaigns.
#ad networks #impact #lead #traffic #vance
  • Profile picture of the author Marcus C
    The best thing you can do is test them both. Although they are both PPV traffic networks, they have different ways of serving their ads, their audiences will also differ slightly in terms of demographics and the traffic reach is not the same.

    For instance, a campaign that's running great on LeadImpact won't necessarily have the same success on Trafficvance and vice versa due to some of the factors above, along with the level competition etc.

    I'm involved with both networks and and both have their strengths and weaknesses depending on what I am trying to achieve from my campaigns.

    All the best,

    - Marcus
    • Profile picture of the author MTVida
      The pop-over vs. pop-under argument can come down to many factors. Let's think about a pre-sell page we might want to target. After going through material on the page, the user may or may not go on to the offer.

      If you target the users with pop-overs, they're seeing your ad before they've even had a chance to be pre-sold. This could make them less likely to click on your ad, or less likely to convert even if they do.

      Now suppose you target them with pop-under. Now, the users have the opportunity to get pre-sold by the trigger page. Yes, some will go on to the offer and complete it. Many more will not, but at that point, they may be on the fence. When they close the page and see your ad, it may prompt them to go ahead and convert.

      In my own experience, Traffic Vance seems to give me better CTR and better conversions in general.
  • Profile picture of the author bizoppmaster
    Both are pop ups or pop overs. Both have quality traffic. If you have the budget though, start with TV.
  • Profile picture of the author Greedy
    TrafficVance has given me better luck.

    But it could just be my campaigns, LeadImpact has still been good as well.

    Just start with LeadImpact and once you get things converting there, THEN reward yourself with your earnings and join TrafficVance.
    • Profile picture of the author typoo999
      Originally Posted by Greedy View Post

      TrafficVance has given me better luck.

      But it could just be my campaigns, LeadImpact has still been good as well.

      Just start with LeadImpact and once you get things converting there, THEN reward yourself with your earnings and join TrafficVance.
      Thanks Greedy, I plan to go with TV as well I just don't know where should I look for an invite... I like LI so far and I love PPV!
  • Profile picture of the author Greedy
    Thanks Greedy, I plan to go with TV as well I just don't know where should I look for an invite... I like LI so far and I love PPV!
    Yes, PPV is great.

    The best place to invite for TrafficVance is from your Affiliate Manager.
  • Profile picture of the author ChrisBa
    Originally Posted by typoo999 View Post

    If I know right Leadimpact serves popup ads and Traffic Vance serves popunders.

    If I had to choose I'd decide to go with popups instead of popunders. Why? Here is my reason: if I target a weight loss product with Leadimpact then the potential customer may buy my product instead of the products on the trigger site because he see my landing page first and engages with it. In the other case, when I would promote the same with Traffic Vance, that potential customer would see the trigger site first and engage with that, buy the product and then visit my site, he wont be interested as he just bough a similar product a minute ago. Am I Right? Or do I see something wrong about it?

    I'm asking those people who used both, which one converted better for you? I do pretty well with Leadimpact but I want to scale up my campaigns.
    As far as I know they both actually serve both

    As always it's better to split test to find out what works best. I personally like trafficvance better but it's a higher min deposit and more difficult to join.
    • Profile picture of the author CarpeDiemNow
      What is best way to track conversion on TrafficVance? I have Prosper202 but it does not give me details of which targets the conversions are coming from to help me best optimize. Or am I missing something here.

      I use postback URL link and put that in the CPA network offer.

      Thank you in advance for feedback
      -Stella

Next Topics on Trending Feed