Anybody out there use Link Juicer?

[Bondtana]

Just curious what my fellow warriors think... I like the idea of having at least some of my backlinks automated like that.

Anyone have any other recommendations for auto backlinking on a schedule?

[melanied]

I signed up for the trial but I canceled it because you were only receiving links from different accounts on ten sites. I couldn't see the long term value in that. Maybe it's different now...

[bhopkins]

I was one of the beta testers of this service and in my opinion it works well for what it was designed for. Its not designed to build thousands of backlinks overnight, its more of a slow and steady wins the race strategy. What starts out slow mushrooms into a massive amount of links over time.

This looks more natural to Google so it does not raise any red flags to get your sites sandboxed. If you use it like a link wheel then you will see better results. What I've done it to put in my web 2.0 properties which link to my main sites. This allows me to build up my entire network of link juice at the same time.

I also like the fact that you set it up once and then its totally hands off. I've had hundreds of links created to various properties and I have not even logged into the site in a month until today when I saw this post and it reminded me to look at my stats.

Worth the cost to me, but others may disagree.

Bruce

[cchance]

its nice from what i've tested of it, its got about a dozen sites that its building off of (since i joined he added 2 new ones) so it looks like hes continuing to expand it, also your not getting "just backlinks"... hes basically building a tree using random accounts on all the sites, using random bookmarks to bookmark the posts that were also made on random accounts with backlinks to your sites

its definitly not a one stop solution to all your backlink needs but considering you can run 50 projects you can definitly get a decent backlink strength along with good link velocity growth so its not a bit wallop of backlinks at once.

only bad thing was the downtime when it first launched it was down for 3-4 days, but ever since then its been up solid so i kinda brushed that off as growth pains.

EDIT: before anyone goes saying anything i know its my first post but i've been a member forever and the guy who runs this was helpful with some problems i had so i figured since no one else had yet i'd put in a few good cents of info.

Really i dont get why more people dont just test it you have 30 free days of trial, and the trial is via paypal so its kinda 0 risk, if you dont like it login to paypal and click cancel lol

[Clayton Jolin]

Originally Posted by melanied

Maybe it's different now...

I don't know how it was back then but it ROCKS for the moment.

Actually, yeah the number of sites doesn't make up a long list.
But then, thats how TLJ works.

Mind that it the TLJ wasn't made to spam links or build massive
amounts of links in a short term. Now who would like that?
Instead, it has a more unique and long term approach.

I'm a regular user there and I must say the admin is really responsive
too.

Hope that helps

Regards.

[cashcow]

I've been using it for about a month or so and I give it a thumbs up. It's moved several of my pages up in the SERPS.

I think it's perfect for automating the tedious job of adding backlinks to your backlinks.

Of course, like anything else it shouldn't be your only method of backlinking for your main site, but it's perfect as the only method for getting link juice to your articles and web2.0 properties.

Lee

[anwar001]

Looks like this service is worth a try. What I would like to know is that who will be creating these accounts and bookmarking our sites? Is it like SB101 membership where we bookmark other members' sites and they in turn bookmark ours or is it completely hands-off?

[Liam Hamer]

I signed up for the 30 day free trial today(via the WSO) and set up a campaign. It took a little while to do, but I'm hoping for some really positive results My advice - just give it a try, if you don't like(which seems unlikely) simply cancel via Paypal before the trial is over.

[Peter Adamson]

Originally Posted by anwar001

Looks like this service is worth a try. What I would like to know is that who will be creating these accounts and bookmarking our sites? Is it like SB101 membership where we bookmark other members' sites and they in turn bookmark ours or is it completely hands-off?

You create the accounts on the blog and bookmarking sites manually. Then you create your campaigns (url, titles, tags, text...). From that point forward it is entirely automated and hands-off.

[The Expert]

I'm using this tool right now and feel that it should be in everyone's toolbox as a part of their overall link building plan. (nothing out there is "the one thing" that you need...you gotta mix it up)

The power of Link Juicer is in using it not to just promote your own site, but in using it to "juice up" your blog farm or link wheel that has links pointing to your money site.

If you setup 10 campaigns pointing at your site itself, that would leave you 40 campaigns for other sites.

Think in "layers" and this tool becomes super-charged.

[Mrs S]

I've started using TLJ and have found it useful for hands off building of backlinks. I think I'll stick with it for a while.

I have one site that is new and getting traffic - and the only thing I did was build two TLJ campaigns.

[anwar001]

Originally Posted by Mrs S

I've started using TLJ and have found it useful for hands off building of backlinks. I think I'll stick with it for a while.

I have one site that is new and getting traffic - and the only thing I did was build two TLJ campaigns.

That's nice to know that you have already started getting traffic using just TLJ.

[younghamir]

I think I will settle for manual link building still.

[AllAboutAction]

I've been a customer for a week now and find that it's a great service. Peter is very responsive to emails, and it couldn't be easier to set up and use.

One feature that I didn't see mentioned was that you can 'spin' your bookmark titles, tags, and descriptions as well as blog entries. I'm still on the free trial, but I'm going to stick around for awhile.

This product can only get better over time as more services are added and more subscribers join, broadening the number of available backlinks. Two thumbs up!

[mark135]

i'm fortunate to have a large turnover so i can afford many schemes and TLJ is one of the many linking tools im involved in

I would only recommend it if you have several sites and get full use out of it.

The title for each campaign often turns out to be the anchor text for your link so i set up a unique title/anchor text for one of my sites that i know i am not getting from any where else.

this was two months ago and i only have 7 links indexed with that anchor text according to my various tools so dont expect to rocket up the search engines, remember in the world of social bookmarking and profile sites there are alot of "nofollow" tags which mess everything up

[Ehsan_am]

Yes after around 3 weeks I only have the software sites showing up. My guess is these links will probabaly take up to 3 motnhs to show up. This is definitley a long term strategy and one should not expect quick reults.

[dizen]

I have been running my campaigns for 3 months now. Will this eventually harm me? I have same article that are automatically get spinned by the system over and over again. Already having the same article posted on approximately 100 word press blogs. Will Google penalize me for this?

[Daniel McGonagle]

As Mr. Hopkins correctly pointed out this service is good for what it does in a slow and steady wins the race fashion, which is how link building is supposed to be anyways.

Peter's adding more features to the system based on some comments he received from this blog post here

The Link Juicer - Recommended? - Link Building Tips + Link building Services

I've used it for a bit longer than Traffic Bug and expected more out of Traffic Bug honestly, but TLJ performed well and in a set-and-forget fashion.

Yes, you'll see some slow and steady rising in the SSERPs for your back-ranked posts, but higher rankings, no matter how slow, is always worth it when it's automated.

I tested 32 different urls with TLC, and more than hal fof them rose in the SERPs within a week, so after those urls got to page 1, I then reduced the link building pace of those campaigns and increased the pace for the other urls and they're doing better with the increased linkacquisition rate.

Will, this work for automically getting you top spots for extremely competitive terms in a short amount of time in a set and forget fashion?

NO

Lemme know a service that does and I'll buy you a house!

[dizen]

Thanks Daniel, what is the threshold to stop a campaign? 100 links per URL?

[Daniel McGonagle]

Originally Posted by dizen

Thanks Daniel, what is the threshold to stop a campaign? 100 links per URL?

I don't think there's a per url threshhold, more like a per account level threshhold.

One thing I messed up on with TLJ was I set every campaigns to 7-10 links a day, not knowing that there's a limit on how many overall links you get per day with this system.

So maxxing out 30-something campaigns to 10/day didn't do my sites much good because they were only getting 1 link a day that way, so Peter advised me to reduce the links/day for the campaigns to 3-5 so I'd see better results, not less.

TRIVIA:

The word thresh hold comes from 2 words, thresh and hold...

In the olden days people put thresh (straw) on their dirt floors when they got cold or muddy.

As winters progressed the thresh piled up and would spill outside whenever a door was opened up.

So people would put something near the door to HOLD the THRESH from spilling out.

Hence the term thresh hold, and why you see it near bottom of doors .

[kkchoon]

I switch to traffic bug, cheaper and better IMO...

Don't really use them to rank high, instead, I use them to vary links. For long tail keywords, it might work well.

[Daniel McGonagle]

Originally Posted by kkchoon

I switch to traffic bug, cheaper and better IMO...

Don't really use them to rank high, instead, I use them to vary links. For long tail keywords, it might work well.

KKCHOON, apparently the overwhelming vast majority of WF members who used Traffic Bug say it DOES NOT work and that it is practically a SCAM, that the owner admitted no links were going out, etc, etc, etc...

So how can you say it works better, if its not working at all?

Had you stayed with TLJ, you'd have real, live, actual results and proof of them,not just opinions.

This is what irritates me about people recommending things and opining about which service,product, program is better, A, B, o or C.

Hardly anyone has proof of WHY they recommend one over another, and it's why I keep popping in here to the WF to direct people to my site (check sig) if I have a review or blog post relevant to the discussion.

Not picking on you KKCHOON, I'm just surprised you are still recommending Traffic Bug when this thread here pretty much says it all

Anyone using Traffic-Bug?

[jc1971]

I am not using traffic bug as it would increase my costs.I haven't noticed any
noticable results with traffic bug but I know I will with the link juicer.You just have to be patient.My page views are slowly increasing and I am getting link exchange requests from people.

[kkchoon]

Originally Posted by Daniel McGonagle

KKCHOON, apparently the overwhelming vast majority of WF members who used Traffic Bug say it DOES NOT work and that it is practically a SCAM, that the owner admitted no links were going out, etc, etc, etc...

So how can you say it works better, if its not working at all?

Had you stayed with TLJ, you'd have real, live, actual results and proof of them,not just opinions.

This is what irritates me about people recommending things and opining about which service,product, program is better, A, B, o or C.

Hardly anyone has proof of WHY they recommend one over another, and it's why I keep popping in here to the WF to direct people to my site (check sig) if I have a review or blog post relevant to the discussion.

Not picking on you KKCHOON, I'm just surprised you are still recommending Traffic Bug when this thread here pretty much says it all

Anyone using Traffic-Bug?

Hey Daniel, I know you long enough that you won't pick a person easily, so I'm not offended in anyway !

As I said, I use traffic-bug to vary my links, just like TLJ.

For ranking, I find it not "practical", too slow and takes a long time...

I really would love to hear anyone rank high with their keywords, even it takes 3 months, I still would like to know if it works.

I suspect this kind of system only work for long tail keywords, still waiting to see more testimonials on this.

Originally Posted by jc1971

I am not using traffic bug as it would increase my costs.I haven't noticed any
noticable results with traffic bug but I know I will with the link juicer.You just have to be patient.My page views are slowly increasing and I am getting link exchange requests from people.

Did you give any patient to traffic bug as well? I see both service the same - for link variation...

I might be wrong, please feedback more result here.