Critique this SEO Plan of Attack for a Brand New Site

[Jay Rhome]

Hey guys and gals. Could you critique this plan of attack for a brand new site? I'm sure the comments will be good pointers for many of us.

Let’s say I get 60 articles on 20 different keywords for one niche domain written for me - 3 versions per keyword. I use version 1 on my site; version 2 on EZA; version 3 on hubpages or squeedoo. Then I spin these articles a few times to be put on 2.0 sites and the other articles sites. Of course I ping, bookmark, RSS, the whole 9 yards. Probably do a couple of Linkwheels to my domain pages + the EZA & Hub or Squeedoo.

Basically, with a totally brand new site, in about 2-3 weeks I’d have lots of content on the site, plus LOTS of outside content, links and linkwheels pointing to the different pages on my domain.

The real issue boils down to this IMO:
Is that too much too fast, or since the links are spread throughout the pages of my site (and lots of content), it’s a great plan?
(It has to be one or the other)

BTW, in general and in this case, do the link juice from the different pages help drive them all up the ranks?
(My guess is yes if we use internal linking).

Anyway, thanks for the coming input!

[breakdance]

Originally Posted by Jay Rhome

Hey guys and gals. Could you critique this plan of attack for a brand new site? I'm sure the comments will be good pointers for many of us.

Let’s say I get 60 articles on 20 different keywords for one niche domain written for me - 3 versions per keyword. I use version 1 on my site; version 2 on EZA; version 3 on hubpages or squeedoo. Then I spin these articles a few times to be put on 2.0 sites and the other articles sites. Of course I ping, bookmark, RSS, the whole 9 yards. Probably do a couple of Linkwheels to my domain pages + the EZA & Hub or Squeedoo.

Basically, with a totally brand new site, in about 2-3 weeks I’d have lots of content on the site, plus LOTS of outside content, links and linkwheels pointing to the different pages on my domain.

The real issue boils down to this IMO:
Is that too much too fast, or since the links are spread throughout the pages of my site (and lots of content), it’s a great plan?
(It has to be one or the other)

BTW, in general and in this case, do the link juice from the different pages help drive them all up the ranks?
(My guess is yes if we use internal linking).

Anyway, thanks for the coming input!

LOL Jay, your *plan-of-attack* almost sounds the SAME as mine, so I'd like to know the answer to your question(s) as well...

[Jay Rhome]

Good minds think alike.

[Fernando Veloso]

I don't see any problem with your plan. Go for it!

[VladWorks]

Sounds legit enough to me....Should work well...If you focus on links links links

[Jay Rhome]

Oh yeah! I feel pumped and ready to go now, thanks.

Someone has suggested to begin the outside linking process mostly to 2.0 sites that link to the domain, and not the domain itself. It probably is a safer approach.

Though I can't imagine Google, Y and B penalizing sites that start big with inside and outside content, but we hear so many opposite views.
A new site such as this one would have tons of links pointing back to it, but spread across many different keywords and pages so it should work.

Of course the best way to know is to test, but having 60 articles rewritten cost a few $$$$. Multiply by many websites + all the time invested...

BTW the reason I'd go for Hubpages and Squeedoo as 2.0 sites is that for me personally my easiest pages to rank (by far) are Hubpages, while I keep hearing very good things about Squeedoo for affiliate marketing, including good traffic from within Squeedoo itself. I have very few experience with Squeedoo however. Is it "better" than hubpages for my proposed strategy?

[marketseeker]

Many people have their site done before launching hundreds of pages so I doubt you could add content to fast. We know you can't add links too fast. The only thing I would consider flawed is the spun articles, the quality. Other wise just do it.

Originally Posted by Jay Rhome

Hey guys and gals. Could you critique this plan of attack for a brand new site? I'm sure the comments will be good pointers for many of us.

Let’s say I get 60 articles on 20 different keywords for one niche domain written for me - 3 versions per keyword. I use version 1 on my site; version 2 on EZA; version 3 on hubpages or squeedoo. Then I spin these articles a few times to be put on 2.0 sites and the other articles sites. Of course I ping, bookmark, RSS, the whole 9 yards. Probably do a couple of Linkwheels to my domain pages + the EZA & Hub or Squeedoo.

Basically, with a totally brand new site, in about 2-3 weeks I’d have lots of content on the site, plus LOTS of outside content, links and linkwheels pointing to the different pages on my domain.

The real issue boils down to this IMO:
Is that too much too fast, or since the links are spread throughout the pages of my site (and lots of content), it’s a great plan?
(It has to be one or the other)

BTW, in general and in this case, do the link juice from the different pages help drive them all up the ranks?
(My guess is yes if we use internal linking).

Anyway, thanks for the coming input!

[jacobwall]

Of course don't forget to post back how you go :>.

[Jay Rhome]

I'm starting the process right now.

I'll give feedback in about 3-4 weeks.

[breakdance]

Originally Posted by Jay Rhome

I'm starting the process right now.

I'll give feedback in about 3-4 weeks.

Be sure to let us know how the process went for you...

[metafever]

Looks solid mate . . . let us know the results.

[Designerplus]

The plan looks fine. You won't get slammed for doing something like that. What you should try to work on as well is relevance. Get links from sites that are about your topic. Too many article like sites might look funny but still won't hurt you.

[olamilekan2]

This is a brilliant technique. And it is similar to what i am doing now, i will post result here soon as well well.