![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 80
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
I am considering making some sort of linking scheme using web 2.0 properties. What would be the best way to go about it. I am going to spin all the articles to 60-70% uniqueness. Would it be better to make a massive linkwheel for example squidoo --> wordpress --> vox --> blogsome --> quizilla --> freewebs --> weebly --> blogger --> squidoo2 --> blogsome2 --> vox2 --> etc which would basically reuse the same web2.0 properties but with different articles and mix it up. Or should I make 3 or 4 small linkwheels. Its hard to tell which one would work for the long run. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 114
Thanks: 24
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
There is no rules in the linkwheel bro , Its depends on the keywords and competition so just do trail and error that only can teach you.I prefer to use 6 web 2.0 properties but still it depends on the keywords and competition .
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Hot Dogg Struttin Floozy Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Oregon
Posts: 236
Thanks: 44
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
|
Just remember to never repeat the same linking structure twice for the same site. Randomization is your best friend for link wheels.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,235
Blog Entries: 6 Thanks: 134
Thanked 223 Times in 170 Posts
|
The bigger the wheel the harder it is to keep tabs on it all. I use 5 sites and mix and match the links and RSS feeds as much as I can within these 5 sites. I also do some article backlinking to some of the "Deep" pages to show external links coming into the wheel. Remember - you are the only one who is supposed to know about your linkwheel. Try to make it both organised and a bit random at the same time. |
| The Memoirs Of Edward Rochester - Just imagine if Jane Eyre had been written by Mr Rochester. My first full length novel now on Kindle and In Print on Createspace. That's what I call a niche! | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Steve Hawkins War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Whitleybay, uk
Posts: 1,967
Blog Entries: 2 Thanks: 11
Thanked 923 Times in 185 Posts
|
I found link wheels with 4/5 sites mixed always works well.. I dont do a direct link on all of the wheels ie.. site1 -> site 2 -> site 3 site 4 -> site 2 site 5 -> site 4 -> site 1 No technically a full link wheel but it seems to work well.. |
| | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| I'm trying... Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 187
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
I use 6 and combine links with RSS and it works perfect for me.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Systematic Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Norfolk, England.
Posts: 1,906
Blog Entries: 9 Thanks: 35
Thanked 298 Times in 217 Posts
|
I personally find creating an individual property, linking it to your site and then linking to the property by other means works best. Why give Google footprints to follow, especially now we all know that they are "on" to link wheels. 1. Create you property, link it to your site and also out to a couple of high reputation sites in your niche. 2. Link to that property via profile links etc to build the power of the property, so its link value to you increases. By doing this you keep the danger with the expendable web 2.0 property rather than your own site. |
| | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Online World...
Posts: 2,920
Thanks: 96
Thanked 521 Times in 266 Posts
|
Linkwheel is just one of the senario, you should always build more web 2.0 properties for backlinks and traffic, but not necessary linking them together!
|
|
Generate Massive Free Targeted Traffic On Automation ==>Nuclear Traffic Storm Turn Your Backlink Into RSS And Get Google To Crawl Them ==> Nuclear Link Crawler Guaranteed To Rank Your Site On Page 1 ========> Guaranteed Ranking Service Powerful Indexer That Makes Your Backlinks Count ==> Nuclear Link Indexer | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| linkwheel, massive |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |