![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: May 2009 Location: Germany
Posts: 254
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
As you may know one can place internal anchors on a page and link to them. The resulting URL looks like this xxx.site.com/brandX#ProductY. Now in order to rank for "ProductY" would it be acceptable for Google to use that anchor link or would it be better to just use "xxx.site.com/brandX"? The reason Im asking is because I have plenty of brand overview pages that list several products of that brand on one page. It only recently occured to me that I may be able to rank better in Google for the individual product names if I were to place an anchor and use that as the url. Does anyone know? Unfortunately I have already done quite a few backlink campaigns were I always used "xxx.site.com/brandX" as the links for "brandX productY" or "brandX productZ". It has been working pretty ok since I got good SEO title tags that usually include "brandX productY" or "brandX productZ". But I'm thinking I may do a little better with this anchor tweak seeing that some of the products with their product names are way down on the page (and actually not all of them are in the SEO title tag). Unless of course Google gets confused with this and sees "xxx.site.com/brandX#ProductY" as a completely different url than just "xxx.site.com/brandX"? If that was the case I would lose the keyword rank I have already in place. If Google however sees that its basically the same page url then I may not lose my rank and get a boost from the following refined "xxx.site.com/brandX#ProductY" backlink campaigns. I hope it is clear what my dilemma is. I would appreciate any advice and feedback from experience with this type of keyword linking. Thanks! |
| | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: US of A
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 47
Thanked 257 Times in 211 Posts
|
Google will index the page not the anchor on the page. Test it and see for yourself by visiting other sites using page anchors.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 202
Thanks: 19
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
|
an anchor is a jump to some content within the same page that means we would be asking google to index the same page twice and treat it as separate pages which they are not. The better way is to create individual product pages, change your anchor text links to links to the product pages. You will also convert better this way as they user will only see information for the 1 product on the page rather than seeing your other products too |
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: May 2009 Location: Germany
Posts: 254
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |||
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,486
Thanks: 137
Thanked 641 Times in 553 Posts
|
Hi FlashDriveDT, Google sorts SERPs by relevance and backlinks can influence that relevancy score. You may not realize that the anchor text of your outbound links, external or internal, also significantly influence your page's relevancy score. From my experience, I have not seen a direct benefit from using keywords after a pound sign unless it's part of the anchor text of that inbound link. Search engines seem to ignore anything after the pound sign within a URL. However, you can get a great deal of benefit by including keywords within the anchor text for anchors that link to sections of the same page. I first noticed this on FAQ pages where I placed a lot of internal links to sections of the same document. These type of links are a lot easier to get, since you place them yourself on your own web page, and they reduce the number of backlinks necessary to rank your page in the SERP. Don't take my word for this, test it yourself and let us know what you learn! |
|
Don Burk * Get Results - Outsource Your PPC Management * Get a Keyword Domain Name - www.SeriousNames.com | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: May 2009 Location: Germany
Posts: 254
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
| Quote:
I have done some backlinks now using the structure "xxx.com/brandX#productZ" and can say that the # is indeed ignored, together with the corresponding page internal anchor. In other words Google does not list me for the keyword together with that url, only with "xxx.com/brandX" which is still pretty good.So I do get the link juice either way. However, this is not optimal for the audience as someone already mentioned (since they first have to scroll through a few other products before getting to productZ on my page). So I saw this with wikipedia and I was wondering if this would work with my website? Example keyword: "Genetics and biochemistry of hair color" shows up in the SERPs like this: Genetics and biochemistry of hair color - Google Search Notice how Google offers the article on Human_hair_color with a link underneath the title tag "Jump to Genetics and biochemistry of hair color". This is a link directly to the page internal anchor that marks that section of "Human hair color". This would be almost perfect for what I'm trying to do. Google doesn't index me like this though for my #anchors/backlinks. So I took a look at the html code in the wiki article and this is what is shows: Code: <h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Human_hair_color&action=edit&section=1" title="Edit section: Genetics and biochemistry of hair color">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Genetics_and_biochemistry_of_hair_color">Genetics and biochemistry of hair color</span></h2> | |
| | ||
| | |
| | #7 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: May 2009 Location: Germany
Posts: 254
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
Ok, I just found Googles own guidelines for this: Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Using named anchors to identify sections on your pages So everyone can do this. Lets see if I'm able to implement! |
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| #anchors, google, keyword, page, ranking, urls |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |