Real way to get 560-1020 decent backlinks a day formula

[BeachVitality]

hi, what do you think about backlinkbooster- i'm new, considering purchase.
or the whole concept of backlinking your backlinks. worth it?

thanks... great job/info!

ps- images not loading up on your alb page?

[Maestrok12]

Wow!! Looks like I gotta alot work! Thanks for that realistic info.

[sunalogin]

thx, sounds fine

[mu123]

oh now I understand why I got some pages deindexed.
Daniel , my question is: How much time you usually spend for backlinking 5-10 blog posts ? After you gave idea above about what you do, this seams like bunch of many hours of work. But I have 20 blogs.
Other question: how much you pay for the services for submitting + plugins?
Thanks in advance

Originally Posted by Daniel McGonagle

Overlinking is when you get a burst of links then get no links at all.

If you build links you won't get hurt if you keep the velocity consistent

So, the answer;'s NO, it won't hurt you unless you try it for a day then stop everything you're doing.

However, you have to realize that most of this is an automated system that works totally hands-free and is consistent since its automated,

[dhdz187]

Very useful tips , thanks

[Irmscher]

Thanks for the tips

But here is my 2 cents:

It's too dangerous to build backlinks that fast (1000 links a day is enormous amount of links). I really think that you need to maintain easy-easy tempo when it comes to backlink building, and the less artificial links - the better.

So I'd be careful with those 1k links a day, Google slap is watching us guys.

Thanks

[seoforu]

Thanks for that post..but it looks as if it's an inorganic way of building links..too many links in a short time can harm you...so be alert.

[NetWorth]

Thanks Great Post and good commentary from everyone.

[jasonl70]

feedburner:
I would stay away from using a service that google runs..
also, as was mentioned later in the thread, feedburner isn't indexed, etc.

It concerns me that the OP talked about feedburner as if he had a lot of real experience/facts backing up his use of it.. yet it turns ot it was a waste of his time..

which leads me to this:
in my experinece, the bulk of this stuff quite working a year or so ago. Most of it invovles nofollow's and redirects (bit.ly), which in my opinion do not warrant much time devoted to aquiring. I still use rss in my seo efforts, but it's not as simple and straight forward as it once was.

Heck, the OP talks about how great a link building process this is, yet he then turns around and says he doesn't like to use tools to check for # of backlinks.. could it be because the reality does not meet expectations?

twitter: not only is it nofollow, but most tools replace your urls with redirects (bit.ly, etc). I use twitterfeed, but for clients who want their social media efforts more automated - I do not use it for seo/link building.

Originally Posted by Daniel McGonagle

Hi this is my fault for suggesting this, I didn't verify something before I wrote that part about Feedburner.

Feedburner still won't be indexed even if you use the publicize tab.

I hope the mods don't delete this, but here's why you need to use Feedage instead of feedburner to host and handle your rss readership and feeds

Feedage.com review + how and why you should use Feedage.com - Link Building - Link building Services

If the link gets deleted I will repost the content here.

Google the urls for all your feedburner feeds to see if any show up in the SERPs, I did this for 20 of my feedburner feeds,and didn't see a single one indexed after a year or so hosting my feed with them so I switched to feedage for that...

You changed methods, and again speak of it in such absolute terms - as if you have been doing/testing this for a long time.

I'm still digesting what you wrote, as my initial reaction is that there is some good stuff mixed with some questionably effective stuff, but I thought I would comment on those issues.

I DO tend to agree with some of your dup content conclusions - and like you, I have no issues with people scraping me feeds

[Daniel McGonagle]

There should be a term called link sniping coined, which would mean that you build links to something, like 5-6 blog posts until they get ranked where you want them to rank, like in top 3 or until you realize that the effort or competition to rank in top 3 isn't wort hit.

If you have tons of content then at least get it all to page 1 for desired terms

Originally Posted by mu123

oh now I understand why I got some pages deindexed.
Daniel , my question is: How much time you usually spend for backlinking 5-10 blog posts ? After you gave idea above about what you do, this seams like bunch of many hours of work. But I have 20 blogs.
Other question: how much you pay for the services for submitting + plugins?
Thanks in advance

[Daniel McGonagle]

Not necessarily true, 1k links a day being dangerous, this has been proved dozens of times

Read this

Over link building will hurt your rankings efforts - Link Building - Link building Services

Originally Posted by Irmscher

Thanks for the tips

But here is my 2 cents:

It's too dangerous to build backlinks that fast (1000 links a day is enormous amount of links). I really think that you need to maintain easy-easy tempo when it comes to backlink building, and the less artificial links - the better.

So I'd be careful with those 1k links a day, Google slap is watching us guys.

Thanks

[Daniel McGonagle]

Twitter, twitterfeed, feedburner, rss links and delicious links are all good because they serve as index drivers (getting urls indexed), that's it.

I'm back to using FB now in conjunction with feedage because FB does better job of posting autotweets than twitter feed does and supposedly does some pinging of feed item urls

Originally Posted by jasonl70

feedburner:
I would stay away from using a service that google runs..
also, as was mentioned later in the thread, feedburner isn't indexed, etc.

It concerns me that the OP talked about feedburner as if he had a lot of real experience/facts backing up his use of it.. yet it turns ot it was a waste of his time..

which leads me to this:
in my experinece, the bulk of this stuff quite working a year or so ago. Most of it invovles nofollow's and redirects (bit.ly), which in my opinion do not warrant much time devoted to aquiring. I still use rss in my seo efforts, but it's not as simple and straight forward as it once was.

Heck, the OP talks about how great a link building process this is, yet he then turns around and says he doesn't like to use tools to check for # of backlinks.. could it be because the reality does not meet expectations?

twitter: not only is it nofollow, but most tools replace your urls with redirects (bit.ly, etc). I use twitterfeed, but for clients who want their social media efforts more automated - I do not use it for seo/link building.



You changed methods, and again speak of it in such absolute terms - as if you have been doing/testing this for a long time.

I'm still digesting what you wrote, as my initial reaction is that there is some good stuff mixed with some questionably effective stuff, but I thought I would comment on those issues.

I DO tend to agree with some of your dup content conclusions - and like you, I have no issues with people scraping me feeds

[jasonl70]

Originally Posted by Daniel McGonagle

Twitter, twitterfeed, feedburner, rss links and delicious links are all good because they serve as index drivers (getting urls indexed), that's it.

I'm back to using FB now in conjunction with feedage because FB does better job of posting autotweets than twitter feed does and supposedly does some pinging of feed item urls

I've also had problems with twitterfeed.. I'm glad I'm a programmer, because it seems more times then not I simply throw in the towel with some of these tools and just make my own.

I find simply pinging pingomatic type sites is enough to get my sites indexed, in conjunction with an xml sitemap & "sitemap update" pings to google.

[joyartc]

thanks for the information, I will immediately try it, and hopefully as I expected.