Go Back   WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Adsense / PPC / SEO Discussion Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Social Groups CalendarHelp Desk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-22-2009, 12:22 PM   #1
Active Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Ratio of high PR links vs low quality links

Some SEO gurus have said that there should be far more low quality inbound links to a site than high quality links, because that's the way it is in the real world, hence that's how it looks 'natural' to Google.

They say that Google flags and penalizes sites that have unnatural looking linking. For example, if a site has 1,000 backlinks, there should be less than 100 that are PR 5 and above.

Is there any validity to this? How does this jive with purchasing the various high PR packages that are available in this forum?

Your advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Michael
michaelr7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 12:46 PM   #2
Senior Warrior Member
War Room Member
 
Andy Fletcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: , , .
Posts: 2,494
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 1,232 Times in 394 Posts
Default Re: Ratio of high PR links vs low quality links

Hi Michael,

I think you're a little confused between page rank and domain rank. Page rank applies to the page a link is from whereas domain rank applies to the domain a link is from.

The high PR packages that are sold on Warrior and everywhere else are almost always sites with a high PR for the domain's homepage that let you create pages internally, which are 0 PR.

Although they are 0PR pages they still help you rank by passing some link juice to your page due to the high domain rank of the site they are on (that's a little over simplified by will do for this discussion).

So although a "natural" link profile has many more PR0 links than PR1 than PR2 etc this isn't a problem with these links because they are all PR0.

Hope that clears things up for you,

Andy

Andy Fletcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 01:03 PM   #3
Active Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Ratio of high PR links vs low quality links

Got you! So basically, all these links in the packages being sold are on PR0 pages.

Thanks!
michaelr7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 01:04 PM   #4
Senior Warrior Member
War Room Member
 
Andy Fletcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: , , .
Posts: 2,494
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 1,232 Times in 394 Posts
Default Re: Ratio of high PR links vs low quality links

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelr7 View Post
Got you! So basically, all these links in the packages being sold are on PR0 pages.

Thanks!
Yes. That's correct.

Andy Fletcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 01:25 PM   #5
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
 
Glassjaw009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 232
Thanks: 3
Thanked 42 Times in 38 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile 
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to Glassjaw009
Default Re: Ratio of high PR links vs low quality links

A lot of new Internet Marketers make the mistake of only targeting High PR dofollow links and all of a sudden, they don't perform as advertised. This is because Google expects that you're going to have a lot more nofollow low PR links than dofollows.

For every dofollow/high PR link you grab, I'd grab 5 to 6 nofollows.

The Ultimate in Auto-Pilot Income: The Blogging Bible

Clickbank Coaching?: How To Bank With Clickbank

Grab Links By The Horns: My Blog Backlink Packet
Glassjaw009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 09:52 AM   #6
Active Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Ratio of high PR links vs low quality links

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Fletcher View Post

The high PR packages that are sold on Warrior and everywhere else are almost always sites with a high PR for the domain's homepage that let you create pages internally, which are 0 PR.

Although they are 0PR pages they still help you rank by passing some link juice to your page due to the high domain rank of the site they are on (that's a little over simplified by will do for this discussion).

So although a "natural" link profile has many more PR0 links than PR1 than PR2 etc this isn't a problem with these links because they are all PR0.

Hope that clears things up for you,

Andy
On thinking about this, wouldn't this also touch off a filter at Google?

These pages are PR0, but all the sites that these pages reside on have high domain rank. It's very unnatural to get links ONLY from such high rank sites.

Also, almost all links come from forums. Another potential trigger for a flag going off at Google.

Any thoughts?

Thanks.
michaelr7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Adsense / PPC / SEO Discussion Forum

Tags
high, links, low, quality, ratio

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 PM.