![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Trainee Warrior :o) War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 16
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi All The thread title pretty much sums up the question: I'm looking for some figures on how many people bother to go beyond P1 of SERPs in the main SE's. It maybe varies KW to KW but I'm sure there will be an average somewhere. Preferably with some backup to the answer ![]() Anyone have any ideas or help please? Cheers Mark |
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Austin, TX, USA.
Posts: 210
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
|
In 2008 it was hardly anyone: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/w...atmap-2008.jpg So I imagine today it's even less. People would only go past P1 if the search term is something unusual and doesn't have relevant results. |
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Oxnard, Ca, USA.
Posts: 205
Thanks: 56
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts
|
I personally go several pages deep when I'm searching for 'keyword' + reviews, or 'keyword' + bonus.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Happy Hooker War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: North of the Peace River, Southwest Florida, USA.
Posts: 8,038
Thanks: 2,931
Thanked 4,902 Times in 2,616 Posts
|
I've read several of those studies where the end result says no one goes beyond page one. All of the ones I've read share one of the following flaws. > They attempt to draw conclusions from a huge sample size without making any attempt to account for the intent of the search. If someone is looking for a simple answer, such as the definition of a word or a currency conversion rate, the odds of finding the desired result in the top slot are high. There's no reason to go lower. The same reasoning would apply to searches for specific companies. For that matter, many people still type urls into the search bar. > They use very small samples, using relatively sophisticated searchers with defined tasks. The search behavior of a someone looking for one specific detail or bit of information is going to be different than someone simply trying to learn about a topic or find a useful review. Many eye-tracking studies have this characteristic. Like a previous poster, I'll go several pages deep quite often. I've learned that the most useful information may not be the most highly optimized. If I don't find anything promising after scanning 4-5 pages of results, I'll change the search query. That usually means moving further out in the long tail. Information on search behavior of buyers within a given niche market would be far more useful to most marketers than overall click behavior of the universe at large. Unless, of course, your "product" is #1 ranking on Google... |
| Salad is not food. Salad is what food eats... -- The REAL PETA, People for Eating Tasty Animals "I did not fight my way to the top of the food chain to eat tofu!" | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 183
Thanks: 118
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
|
I also would like to know the exact statistic and the details. I've seen all sorts of numbers out there, and am looking to find the source of these statistics. Thanks in advance, Russell =) |
| | |
| | #6 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Arizona
Posts: 240
Thanks: 83
Thanked 62 Times in 53 Posts
|
In December 2010, one of my sites had 2611 google organic visits where I could see enough information to know what SERP position the visitor clicked on. Positions 1 through 10: 1983 visits Positions 11 through 20: 300 visits Positions 21 through 30: 141 visits Positions 31 and beyond: 187 visits To break down the "beyond" a little bit, I looked at positions 31, 41, 51, etc. 31 - 7 visits, 41 - 5, 51 - 6, 61 - 3, 71 - 1, 81 - 0, 91 - 2, 101 - 1 In case you're interested in the breakdown of the top 10 positions: 1 - 434 visits, 2 - 259, 3 - 255, 4 - 268, 5 - 168, 6 - 154, 7 - 130, 8 - 104, 9 - 101, 10 - 110 -- Patey |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Architect War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: California
Posts: 273
Thanks: 87
Thanked 60 Times in 48 Posts
| Quote:
Can you share what software/service gives you that data? Thanks | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Arizona
Posts: 240
Thanks: 83
Thanked 62 Times in 53 Posts
| Quote:
You can make google analytics collect full referral paths, by following the instructions I wrote a while back in this post: Finally it's converting The next step is to make a custom report using Source/Medium as the first dimension, drilling down to User Defined Value (where your full referral path lives) as the second dimension. For metrics I usually show Visits, Pages/Visit, Avg. Time on Site, Avg. Time on Page, % New Visits, Bounce Rate, and Goal Completions. Okay, so, you view this report for whatever time period you're interested in. Click "google / organic" in the Source/Medium column to drill down. Now you see a list of user-defined values that are the full referral paths. The format varies depending on where the search came from. When a visitor actually went to google.com and typed in a query, you get a path like this: hxxp://www.google.com/url?...bunch of stuff... Within that "bunch of stuff" will be a parameter like "&cd=1", for example. That tells you your result was in position 1. Your keyword is buried in there too, but the next step is more readable if you click the dropdown to make the second column show Keyword. So now you can use the filter feature at the bottom of the list to look for keyword results in a certain position. Filter User Defined Value containing &cd=1& ...and you'll see everything where you were in position one. (You want that final ampersand to keep your filtered results from including 11, 12, etc.) The brute force part was when I filtered for the different positions, one by one, and wrote the total visits down for each. Good luck with it all. -- P. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 183
Thanks: 118
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
| Quote:
Thanks Patey | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Directory Veteran War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: South Florida
Posts: 654
Thanks: 72
Thanked 65 Times in 47 Posts
|
If 76% were just page one, and you ranked page two or three for a term with enough search volume, you can get some good traffic. I have a site that makes $ with a rank of #32 for a very popular term. |
| HeDir.com ranks #1 or #2 for "human edited directory" DebtPlan.org ranks #3 for "debt consolidation california" | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| SEO MASTER Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: United States of Europe
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
having lot of keywords it's best
|
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| people, serps, statistics |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |