![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Hi everyone, This is my first post so I wanted to say hello and thanks to eveyone for the great forum and for helping us newbies. The top 10 listing for the keyword that I'm researching shows sites that are very big and old. However the pages I'll be competing with don't seem to be concerned about on or off page optimization. In Traffic Travis the BL column shows very few direct backlinks. One site has 30 the others have 0 or 1 which seems very encouraging. However, the BLS column, (which I understand means the number of links to the TLD) shows very large numbers. For example the Amazon site has over 115 million BLS backlinks and the Youtube site has over 500 million. Traffic Travis say my keword is relatively easy to compete with, 4 stars. Keyword Elite is less encouraging, a yellow warning with 56% difficulty. How concerned should I be about the high numbers under the BLS column? Also, how concerned should I be about the age of these sites? Thanks Elliot |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,555
Thanks: 466
Thanked 512 Times in 320 Posts
|
If your competition has all or most of their backlinks going to the TLD, and their pages aren't optimised (or optimized if you're in the US) then that is ideal. Whenever I see that for any keywords I want, I rub my hands with glee. As I know I will probably get the number 1 spot eventually |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 616
Thanks: 134
Thanked 111 Times in 68 Posts
|
It really depends on a case by case basis, but from what you've mentioned so far, it definitely sounds beatable |
| | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Thanks guys. Thats what I wanted to hear. Elliot |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| backlinks, bls, level, page, site, specific, top |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |