I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed.

momo3 · 01-19-2011, 10:02 PM

Ugh

I am so sorry to bug you'all.. but I am very confused about getting newly created links indexed.

There are so many ways to do it -- some say to take all links and make into RSS feeds and then ping the feeds.

Others say do that but put it onto a high PR site or a site with a high PR site pointing at it.

Others suggest sophisticated software that costs a lot of money.

All seem tedious to me.

Why wouldn't one just cut and paste the list of the new links to here: PingDevice

?

Also, if I do choose RSS and pinging the RSS -- how many can I bundle into the RSS feeds? Does it matter? Can I do 1000?

Thanks

PS -- Also, does pinging ever leave trails that big G might not like so much?

NeillSEO · 01-19-2011, 10:39 PM

20-30 links per rss feed is recommended. A lot of people seem to have trouble with the link indexing, and it is very important. I'm working on an ebook about this right now.

There are several different approaches, and all of them seem to work. Some are more time consuming than others.

Pinging them all doesn't really work very well. You might get 5-10% indexed like that.

The reason most people suggest the RSS feeds is that they are free and usually 70-80% effective if you do it right (a bunch of small feeds).

Oranges · 01-19-2011, 10:42 PM

I follow these steps, and get at least 90% of my links indexed every time.

1. Create RSS Feed from created Backlinks on Html2Rss.com,
2. Then Create Feedburner Feed from Html2Rss.com Feed, you created from html2rss.com
3. Then submit that feed to

FeedListing
FeedAgg.com | The Best Blogs and RSS Feeds on the Web | RSS Directory
Feedgy - Submit your RSS Feed to the RSS Directory
Blog and Ping Tool - Use Pingler.com to Drive Traffic your Blogs and Websites
Ping-o-Matic!
PingDevice
Add your URL to Google

NeillSEO · 01-19-2011, 10:56 PM

Something else to note: the spammier the backlinks, the harder it is to convince google to index them. Profiles (especially on PR0 sites) are normally the worst as there is no content on the page other than your link. Google isn't a big fan of this.

Articles and sites like squidoo, hubpages, and wordpress are infinitely easier to index because there is perceived value in the content for google.

satrap · 01-19-2011, 10:59 PM

The easiest way to get you link indexed (for me) is to put the link in my WF signature. Most of the times it gets indexed within hours.

scott g · 01-19-2011, 11:05 PM

I posted this a while back... Hopefully you get the idea.

Quote:

Copy and past ALL the URLs that you've built backlinks on (articles, blog comments, whatever). You should turn this into habit. I have several .txt files saved and have more than 8k URLs in them. After a day of backlink building I will meta index, ping, and turn the URLs my backlinks are on into RSS Feeds and submit to a handful of aggregators.

I've had some pretty good luck with getting majority of my backlinks indexed this way. I think the Meta Indexing really helps. SEO Fast Indexer (available in the War Room (mentioned before)) is a great tool for doing this. I usually Meta Index to 500 sites for each URL... Someone's search engine bot is BOUND to stumble across these and re-crawl that site finding my backlink!!

Links 2 RSS - Convert a list of URLs to RSS feeds

I usually only add 75-100 links to a feed.

CHEERS!

momo3 · 01-19-2011, 11:38 PM

Thanks guys. LOTS of info on it, and its hard to know what is the best move to take.

scott g · 01-19-2011, 11:52 PM

Ok.... I just posted THIS in another Thread! These Indexing Threads have got to STOP!!!!

Quote:

Build backlinks
Create RSS Feeds and submit to multiple aggregators (Links2RSS for HTML sites (or backlinks you want indexed))
Ping your shat! (Pingler.com FREE)
Social Bookmarking (Ping.fm & Onlywire.com FREE)
Submit your site to Bing
Submit your site to Yahoo!
Add your URL to Google
Submit Sitemaps (Google Webmaster Tools & Bing Toolbox)
Submit to Statistics Websites aka Meta Indexing

Free RSS Directories/Aggregators you can submit your feeds to:

Ponyfish RSS Feed Builder
Atom and RSS Feed Catalog - Submit RSS Feed
Submit Your RSS or Atom News Feed
Greenprofs » Submit RSS
submit my rss feed
Read A Blog - Submit your Blog or RSS feed
Social Business Ideas Resourced - View All
RSS feed submission form
Blogdigger - Add Blog Form
Submit Blog
RSS feed Directory - Feedage.com
GoldenFeed.com - Submit your Blog or RSS feed
Submit your RSS Feed - PLAZOO News Search
Feed Submission and FeedRank® Checker - RSSMicro Search
http://www.rssmotron.com/feed_eater.php
Share a blog with Liquida

Examples of Statistic Sites aka Meta Indexing:
HTML Code:
AboutUs: we know the web
Home | Quantcast
Cubestat - Website Value Calculator, Estimations and Information
Website value calculator and web information
Statbrain.com - Tells you how many visitors any site really has
BuiltWith - Website Analysis and SEO Optimization
Site Profile Search | Compete
Whois information for any domain
Alexa Internet - Website Information
McAfee SiteAdvisor Software
AboutDomain.Org(Domain Lookup,Backlinks,Indexed-Pages...)
informacion
Whois Lookup - Who.is - Who.is
Maybe someone will find this post useful!

CHEERS!

Trinidad · 01-20-2011, 12:01 AM

i got few ideas after reading this. To get links indexed, we will need to do it in small scale and we are much sure the links will get indexed. Yah, it is nice and i see that i am doing bunch of senuke profile links a week ago and only two profiles got indexed eventhoug i spam those profile links with 2k scrapebox.

one more thing i love the idea, is we put our links in our sign in this gem forums but what should we do after it indexed? Do we need to remove the links from sign and insert another new links?

01-19-2011, 10:02 PM	#1
momo3 Advanced Warrior Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Minneapolis, MN USA Posts: 981 Thanks: 2 Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts	I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed. Ugh I am so sorry to bug you'all.. but I am very confused about getting newly created links indexed. There are so many ways to do it -- some say to take all links and make into RSS feeds and then ping the feeds. Others say do that but put it onto a high PR site or a site with a high PR site pointing at it. Others suggest sophisticated software that costs a lot of money. All seem tedious to me. Why wouldn't one just cut and paste the list of the new links to here: PingDevice ? Also, if I do choose RSS and pinging the RSS -- how many can I bundle into the RSS feeds? Does it matter? Can I do 1000? Thanks PS -- Also, does pinging ever leave trails that big G might not like so much?

01-19-2011, 10:39 PM	#2
NeillSEO Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 41 Thanks: 12 Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts	Re: I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed. 20-30 links per rss feed is recommended. A lot of people seem to have trouble with the link indexing, and it is very important. I'm working on an ebook about this right now. There are several different approaches, and all of them seem to work. Some are more time consuming than others. Pinging them all doesn't really work very well. You might get 5-10% indexed like that. The reason most people suggest the RSS feeds is that they are free and usually 70-80% effective if you do it right (a bunch of small feeds).

01-19-2011, 10:42 PM	#3
Oranges L'il Rascal Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 331 Thanks: 89 Thanked 39 Times in 34 Posts	Re: I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed. I follow these steps, and get at least 90% of my links indexed every time. 1. Create RSS Feed from created Backlinks on Html2Rss.com, 2. Then Create Feedburner Feed from Html2Rss.com Feed, you created from html2rss.com 3. Then submit that feed to FeedListing FeedAgg.com \| The Best Blogs and RSS Feeds on the Web \| RSS Directory Feedgy - Submit your RSS Feed to the RSS Directory Blog and Ping Tool - Use Pingler.com to Drive Traffic your Blogs and Websites Ping-o-Matic! PingDevice Add your URL to Google

01-19-2011, 10:56 PM	#4
NeillSEO Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 41 Thanks: 12 Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts	Re: I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed. Something else to note: the spammier the backlinks, the harder it is to convince google to index them. Profiles (especially on PR0 sites) are normally the worst as there is no content on the page other than your link. Google isn't a big fan of this. Articles and sites like squidoo, hubpages, and wordpress are infinitely easier to index because there is perceived value in the content for google.

01-19-2011, 10:59 PM	#5
satrap Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Saint louis, Missouri Posts: 906 Thanks: 454 Thanked 229 Times in 101 Posts	Re: I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed. The easiest way to get you link indexed (for me) is to put the link in my WF signature. Most of the times it gets indexed within hours.
	25.gov &.edu + 150 other Dofollow List- Full Master Resell Rights $5 for 20 Online Money Making e-Books 101 Small Business Ideas \| 53 Ways to make money online \| Happy Quotes

01-19-2011, 11:38 PM	#7
momo3 Advanced Warrior Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Minneapolis, MN USA Posts: 981 Thanks: 2 Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts	Re: I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed. Thanks guys. LOTS of info on it, and its hard to know what is the best move to take.

01-20-2011, 12:01 AM	#9
Trinidad Active Warrior Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: USA Posts: 50 Thanks: 0 Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts	Re: I am Confused as Hell Over Getting Links Indexed. i got few ideas after reading this. To get links indexed, we will need to do it in small scale and we are much sure the links will get indexed. Yah, it is nice and i see that i am doing bunch of senuke profile links a week ago and only two profiles got indexed eventhoug i spam those profile links with 2k scrapebox. one more thing i love the idea, is we put our links in our sign in this gem forums but what should we do after it indexed? Do we need to remove the links from sign and insert another new links?
	sesame street games