Article Marketing Robot

[Maverick Kevin]

Originally Posted by anwar001

Many people here are reporting how they have successfully posted to hundreds of sites. All this is fine, but I am more interested in the bottom line - does it help you in achieving good rankings in Google?

*** Another extremely important question - how many days do most article directories take in publishing your article? Many directories take many days or weeks before publishing your articles. Some take as long as a month. This can be quite frustrating.

Good point ... any users of AMR here to clarify this ??...

[muscletom]

how much does it cost ?
is there a spinner inside ?
what text spinner do you use ?

[autumn0106]

This software really helps me a lot in doing article marketing. It is integrated with spinner and you can easily choose the article directory with high Pr. You can get 60%-70% success rate of submission if using a hosting email, unique name and having at least 8chars of password. Compared to other article submission software, this one is really great.

[kevlah]

Originally Posted by Maverick Kevin

*** Another extremely important question - how many days do most article directories take in publishing your article? Many directories take many days or weeks before publishing your articles. Some take as long as a month. This can be quite frustrating.

Originally Posted by Maverick Kevin

Good point ... any users of AMR here to clarify this ??...

Obviously some can take a while if they are not auto-approved directories but whenever I do an article blast with AMR, dozens if not hundreds of the submissions are indexed by google in minutes (never mind them just being published).

Whilst AMR is doing its thing I type the keyword I am targeting into google and choose 'results from the last hour' on the filter menu and they start appearing before I have even finished the blast.

This is for very nichey keywords - if your going for a big keyword then your results will get lost in the mix so in those cases google your author name instead and you can see them appearing.

I use wordpress and have trackbacks turned on so I get notifed whenever I get a link - I get a big lump of them immediately after the blast and a random dripfeed of fresh ones over the next few weeks as the rest of the directories approve the articles.

Short answer: the bulk of them auto-approve, so very quickly

[seoed]

well, the old days of amr are gone to my mind.

some months ago amr worked unbelievably well. immediately after submission I could see a ranking improvement. mostly not even 24 hours passed and I could see great results.

I just did 3 runs again but unfortunately it doesnt work so well anymore. I guess it has to do with the latest google updates.

[pauly99]

I continue to use AMR and it works great for me. Plenty of links to my money sites and pushing up the rankings.

[General Trias]

Hello Housewarrior,
Great review, well said... thank-you for that!

[dagaul101]

If you can do it naturally then nothing beats a manual review and submission

[andyj00]

Originally Posted by seoed

well, the old days of amr are gone to my mind.

Originally Posted by seoed

some months ago amr worked unbelievably well. immediately after submission I could see a ranking improvement. mostly not even 24 hours passed and I could see great results.

I just did 3 runs again but unfortunately it doesnt work so well anymore. I guess it has to do with the latest google updates.

I’d agree with this.
I’ve been using AMR for well over a year and in the beginning it worked well and I got good rankings on my sites. But recently I’ve used it to try to dig my sites out of the Google Panda updates and its having no effect whatsoever. I submit 1 high quality, highly spun article a day that I purchase from a service.

The tool is very good – articles I submitted a year ago are still live and indexed in Google. I currently get around 700 submissions at present from a range of page ranked sites. However, does not matter how good the tool is if you are not getting movement in the SERPS for your own sites.
The tool does exactly as advertised – cannot complain with what the tool offers - but the proof is in the pudding and what effect it has on your sites.

[neil_patmore]

I agree with the above two posts. AMR used to work great but out of the box it's no where near as powerful as it used to be.

The concept of mass submitting to low quality directories still works. But the list of directories shipped with AMR has been used and abused by every man and his dog. Many of the directories are no longer available and many more have either blocked new registration or have disabled new article submissions.

I'm seeing much better results with freshly scraped article directories, the WP directories seem to yield good results and many of those are auto approve too. It's brought a new lease of life to a piece of software that was starting to lose it's value!

[muscletom]

Originally Posted by neil_patmore

I'm seeing much better results with freshly scraped article directories, the WP directories seem to yield good results and many of those are auto approve too. It's bought a new lease of life to a piece of software that was starting to lose it's value!

what footprint did you use for that ?

[neil_patmore]

Hi Muscletom, pop over to the AMR forum where footprints are discussed in several threads.

[leeluther252]

Originally Posted by neil_patmore

I'm seeing much better results with freshly scraped article directories, the WP directories seem to yield good results and many of those are auto approve too. It's brought a new lease of life to a piece of software that was starting to lose it's value!

Do this and then you can then create rss feeds of your article links. Blast your article links with blog comments. Create bookmarks to your rss feeds and article links.

The point is to get your article links indexed and have link juice flowing to your site.

AMR is still a great tool. It just doesnt work for those who want to blast and go. 2 different tools I understand but you also see lots of threads about scrapebox sucking because blog comments dont do much anymore. If you blast your main site with spam comments that a million others have also done then ya it sucks. Does more harm than good, but you can blast your 2nd and 3rd tier links and it works great. Its all in how you use a tool.

[danielmcintosh]

Hi, I used spinners but they did not work well for me. I had 4 original written articles that I submitted to goarticles, ezine and sooperarticles. However, I received an email from sooperarticles that the article is a Spun. please write unique content and resubmit it. The Ezine rejected that at the first place as there might be change of article reviewing system. However, the ones that got accepted by sooperarticles, ezine and goarticles provided me finest backlinking as well as the commetns by viewers.

[tuckedinside]

In my experience, publishing articles to junk sites just doesn't work.

[EvanHinrichsen]

I haven't used it but use another website travmedia to promote our press releases.

[canadainsurance]

anyone know what footprint i should use in scrapebox to find wp amr friendly auto approve article directories?

[lukedidit]

So is AMR still a viable option for getting decent SERPS?

[vapsjee]

Originally Posted by lukedidit

So is AMR still a viable option for getting decent SERPS?

Im using amr for myself and for my clients and getting amazing results. of course you need to know how to use it.

[kea55]

yeah. from reading this, I am getting pretty confused about AMR as well. I think I may just pay someone from warriors for hire or from fiverr to do it for me. I think that would work just fine.

[vapsjee]

Getting a good list is the hardest part of operating AMR.

[setsune]

Hi, all.. do you mind to share your way to search good directory list? Thanks..

[cooler1]

Originally Posted by vapsjee

Getting a good list is the hardest part of operating AMR.

If you don't own Scrapebox is there any other way of getting a good list for AMR?

Is it worth paying an outsourcer who owns Scrapebox to do it? If so, where would be the best place to find someone for this task.

After you have a good list, how many successful submissions are you getting per article?

Cheers,

[TerryG]

I have been a long time user of AMR and I love it. There are one or two things here I would like to highlight. The first is the pre-loaded article directories do come and go. To fix this problem just search "amr article list" and you can download thousands of newly scraped directories. Run them through AMR import function and it will clean the list. That way you often have an updated directory list.

Secondly, AMR is great for backlinking your backlinks. I make a few wiki posts on org com edu and gov sites. Then using AMR I spin all those urls through the resource box and let them rip. No need for drip feed, these sites can handle quite a few links.

If I find an old article listed under my site search or a video then I will input that url in the spin syntax of my resource box too.

High pr directories I send a drip feed article that links directly to my main site. The lesser pr ones I backlink my backlinks.

[Cantbedone!]

Originally Posted by TBInternetMarketing

Yes I am using my own email account, not gmail account or anything free.
Using the free trial, I have managed to sign up to about 180 sites successfully, and so far I have submitted successfully to 90 sites. Only 1 of those articles sites has a value under the link column. I assume this means the others have been submitted but not yet published.
Just wanting to double check these are actually real sites etc. I'm sure it's all legit, but there's no point buying the software if your articles aren't actually published so you can get the backlink.

Trust me, it is legit. It will definitely post a sh1tload of articles for you. Your mileage will vary of course based on how you use it. You want to make sure you set it up the way Vince recommends and include enough categories so that hopefully one will match something that exists on the directories. Oh and structure your summary according to popular directory guidelines. I sometimes get a lot of rejections due to improper summary.

I usually get about 30-40% success in submissions. Usually about half of those will post the article within the next few days. So right now, I have around 1900 directories in my list with an "OK" status. I will get about 600 submissions and within the week I will see about 300 live posts. Each has 2 links per post giving me around 600 links per run which will appear over the course of about one week.

Takes me about 20 minutes to do all that. I have the captcha account set up in the options so I don't have to do them manually.

Back before I knew any other linking methods, I used this alone to rank a KW in the top 3 with 10k local monthly searches. It started out on page 30 something. That took a while (4 months) but it worked. Not sure if it still would but I'm sure it still helps.

[Champ1]

quick question are you getting those successful submissions from just signing up to the directories provided by AMR or did you import a list? I would love to get that many successful submissions. Never get over 500 though.

[TerryG]

Originally Posted by Champ1

quick question are you getting those successful submissions from just signing up to the directories provided by AMR or did you import a list? I would love to get that many successful submissions. Never get over 500 though.

The directories in AMR (supplied) are old an useless. I went to ArticleRobot - YouTube where the owner shows how to scrape all of the article directories. I followed this and came up with a huge list of successful sites. I trimmed out all those that did not work or were too hard, leaving me with a nice clean list.

You do not need 500 in my view. I see results over time as each article is approved. I started with a good list of under 260 and just did one or two, sometimes three runs before seeing movements on page 1. The beauty is, this is a slow improvement, a gradual climb up the serps. Once at the top, being a good steady link velocity, the rankings should for all intent and purposes - STICK.