Interesting side-effect after last Google algo change (good times for scrapers! Yes, seriously!)

[Steve Crooks]

Okay Josh or is it Joshie?, you see that as contradiction, I don't.. cool, lets move on from this now shall we?

I am now a fully fledged autoblogger again, cos I bought TZ's gear. There you go.. Hows that for contradicting myself?

Originally Posted by guitarjosh

Let me help you with that then, Stevie. You actually have many here if you were to be honest with yourself. And make sure you understand the difference in hiding behind ones words and protecting ones source of income. You should be a big enough boy to make that distinction. What have we had in this thread.. 5 people stop by and say you're wrong to ask such a thing? At least 5 asking you why it's important and stating they wouldn't do it either? But somehow you're right and we're all wrong? Hmm... Anyway, your latest contradiction....

You said

And then you go on to say how spinning articles is okay and you actually teach this. LOL. Dude, please tell me you are not this blind. Spinning articles is a benefit to you.. not to your visitors. You are doing it solely for MFA sites. You can wrap it up and put a pretty bow on it but you are junking up the web with that crap far more than my sites ever will. You then very weakly try to defend your position.



Okay Stevie.. so it's okay to use garbage if I supplement my own content.. so long as it's not central to my operation? Well first of all, I do. I add to my content, much like the blog I showed you. TZ stated he adds to his as well. We've both already told you this. My favorite line is "I use it sparingly and when it is appropriate". Ohh! Well why didn't you say so?! It's okay to trash up the web if we do it "sparingly"? Lol.. come on bro! Should I teach my kids that it's okay to cheat as long as they don't do it too much? Even one of your own students saw the contradiction in this and sent me an IM calling you on it!

I don't care Stevie.. I really don't. But don't try to pretend that you're not adding.. and teaching a system of adding.. to junking up the web. You run your business and we'll run ours. It sure is funny how you conveniently draw the line between right and wrong just a little further away for yourself when trying to claim the moral high road and guilty of the exact same thing. Huge contradiction.

[guitarjosh]

Originally Posted by Steve Crooks

Okay Josh or is it Joshie?, you see that as contradiction, I don't.. cool, lets move on from this now shall we?

I am now a fully fledged autoblogger again, cos I bought TZ's gear. There you go.. Hows that for contradicting myself?

lol.. amen to that. I think TZ should split all recent profits with Rsberg and I. :P

How you likin' it?

[TZ]

Originally Posted by Steve Crooks

This has to be the worst sales pitch in history though TZ.

I agree, and my wife is still steamed that I won't "clean it up".

But I want to be as upfront as possible about income potential. All new domains take time to get traffic. Promising people INSTANT profits that will put them behind the wheel of a Brand New Mercedes in 3 months would make my stomach turn.

In my experience ALL of our domains were a slow and gradual trickle up. I don't care if people DON'T buy my system. What I make on it is about 2% of what we make on Adsense etc. I DON'T want people buying it if they think they will be pulling down 6 figures by next Christmas. SAVE YOUR MONEY if that is what you expect.

There are lots of other long winded (and clean mouthed) sales pages out there. That's fine. I'm rather crude I suppose, but I spent 16 years of my life in coveralls working with aircraft engineers and mechanics - that is how we talk.

I have always said, and I practice what I preach - autoblogs and aggregation systems should not be (in my opinion) the only method for creating income - it's a method that can provide income growing year over year and leave you free to work on your main bread and butter...... manually managed content systems writing in-depth and informative posts that search engines love, and readers love.

[Rsberg]

Originally Posted by guitarjosh

lol.. amen to that. I think TZ should split all recent profits with Rsberg and I. :P

AMEN Brother...LOL

[agnelrollins194]

Interesting theories. Of course, if correct, would mean that even attempts Googless determine what duplicate content is still lacking in one way or ...???

[dagaul101]

I am guessing Google will still have to fine tune their algorithm, but the fear for autobloggers is eventually they may get hit

[mraffiliate]

Originally Posted by Steve Crooks

The truth is.. Do you know what content is on every page you create? What value are you giving people looking to buy cameras apart from some probably irrelevant scraped stuff for some extremely long tail keyword?

You are such a proponet on original and unique content "which is good" but the newbies who are paying you $17 monthly for your Adsense 101 Bootcamp thinking they are getting real value are getting your site-in-a-box ready made for adsense filled with PLR. So you are setting these people up with sites with content that is not original and charging them for it.

Site-in-a-Box is my monthly bonus to all bootcamp members. Every month I will release a brand new niche that has been personally researched by myself that will contain...

• 25 PLR articles based on good starter keywords
• Category Spreadsheet with keywords
• More keywords plus associated search numbers and CPC
• Niche relevant Wordpress themes