Linklicious for profiles?

[jacked]

Hey, has anyone had success with using Linklicious to index masses of profile links, such as 50,000? I am mainly focused on profile links due to their slow indexing properties.

[Bryan V]

bump out of curiosity.

I've heard others saying they track and record "crawling" of the links and they say "that's all you need for it to count", but I'm still unsure. Anyone try it out?

[BacklinkExcellence]

Originally Posted by pack12

bump out of curiosity.

I've heard others saying they track and record "crawling" of the links and they say "that's all you need for it to count", but I'm still unsure. Anyone try it out?

Yes, crawling is enough for profiles to pass SEO value. The thing is that search engines have started to treat profiles differently than other kinds of links, a lot of profiles never show up in any kind of keyword tools or with a link: command but that doesn't mean they don't pass any value. The same started happening with blog comments lately. No search engine or keyword tool is going to show all links that are passing link juice to a site because there is no benefit for them in doing that.

[JBrooks]

damn that's a lot of links. I've been using linklicous and drip feeds login tool together as a trial for indexing since the 22nd - here's what I found (on the 27th):

............Links...Indexed
22nd - 1055... 88
23rd - 1099.....72
24th - 1079.....65

soooo what can we conclude, well nothing the data set it WAY too small, but at best a 8% index rate in 5 days is terrible. Considering you would have to pay a monthly sub for that amount it might be worth doing a small test before you do.

would be interested to hear if you find something that works a little better or if you get varying results.

[Mike Grant]

Originally Posted by dealme

damn that's a lot of links. I've been using linklicous and drip feeds login tool together as a trial for indexing since the 22nd - here's what I found (on the 27th):

............Links...Indexed
22nd - 1055... 88
23rd - 1099.....72
24th - 1079.....65

soooo what can we conclude, well nothing the data set it WAY too small, but at best a 8% index rate in 5 days is terrible. Considering you would have to pay a monthly sub for that amount it might be worth doing a small test before you do.

would be interested to hear if you find something that works a little better or if you get varying results.

Uh

Linklicious is not an indexing service, but a crawling service. Compare SERPs, not indexation.

[HKSEO Extropy]

You guys have it right. Profiles will only get indexed with a lot of work that would be better spent on building more links. Instead just make sure your links get crawled and track the SERPs. Indexing is just a feel good number and not really germane to ranking. (I'd rather have more links indexed than not, but ultimately my SERPs are what matter)

[John Williamson]

Mike's right. People seem to think Linklicious is an indexing solution in and of itself; it's not. It gets your links crawled, which in some cases may get more of them indexed, but still does not do much other than ping your links in a roundabout way. Tools like Backlink Booster and Backlink Energizer are different in that you're sending links to your backlinks to give them a much higher chance of getting indexed, as opposed to simply pinging them.

[penpal6]

Originally Posted by BacklinkExcellence

Yes, crawling is enough for profiles to pass SEO value. The thing is that search engines have started to treat profiles differently than other kinds of links, a lot of profiles never show up in any kind of keyword tools or with a link: command but that doesn't mean they don't pass any value. The same started happening with blog comments lately. No search engine or keyword tool is going to show all links that are passing link juice to a site because there is no benefit for them in doing that.

Agree on this with BacklinkExcellence

[HKSEO Rotzee]

Originally Posted by John Williamson

Mike's right. People seem to think Linklicious is an indexing solution in and of itself; it's not. It gets your links crawled, which in some cases may get more of them indexed, but still does not do much other than ping your links in a roundabout way. Tools like Backlink Booster and Backlink Energizer are different in that you're sending links to your backlinks to give them a much higher chance of getting indexed, as opposed to simply pinging them.

BB and BE and BIE are all great tools for being indexed. But at the end of the day you'll spend maybe .10 or .20 a link to get in the index. (It may take 50 links to get one profile indexed) So the (semi) obvious solution is to buy 50 more cheap links, ping them until they are crawled, and ignore indexing numbers. I'm happy so many people on this thread get it. :P

[masterjani]

Even 50% effect from the pinging is success because of too much pings per day

[4morereferrals]

Originally Posted by HKSEO Rotzee

(It may take 50 links to get one profile indexed) So the (semi) obvious solution is to buy 50 more cheap links, ping them until they are crawled, and ignore indexing numbers.

Whys that?

What do all the brilliant people "get" ?

[HKSEO Rotzee]

Originally Posted by 4morereferrals

Whys that?

What do all the brilliant people "get" ?

That if a link isn't found, it doesn't count. An indexed link might be worth more, but the effort it takes to index a profile can probably be better spent building more links. Or just point the weak links to the pyramid/feeder sites and not worry about it at all.

And to be honest with you, I know why you chimed in... I'll state that I think you have a pretty awesome product and I actually stand behind it...but in my personal opinion, its not cost effective.

[iyerkedar]

I have seen SERP improvements for my websites with Linklicious.

This tool is very useful especially for those cheap and crappy forum profile links and blog comments. Most of these cheap links are not even crawled by Google. Linklicious will make sure they are crawled by Google. This is enough for SERP improvement.