![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 614
Thanks: 240
Thanked 229 Times in 69 Posts
|
I made a similar thread a long time ago when I was still a newb and pretty much had very little of a clue about what I was doing. Now that I have a system that works, I wanted to throw this back out there and get some opinions. I build SEO websites for organic search engine ranking. Every course/ebook I've ever bought on building sites in this method say to backlink very very slowly. I am not a patient person. For the last few months I've been building these types of sites and backlinking the living hell out of them. What happens is that the site will hit page 1 in Google for its keywords fairly quickly, usually within a few days, I'll get boatloads of traffic and sales, then the site will get sandboxed so then it will sit on the outskirts of Google for several months without me touching it. Needless to say, traffic, while still there, will not be as great for a while, and sales will slow down. I've never had the patience to wait the month for a site to rank naturally on its own before backlinking, though I can only assume it would be better since then the traffic would be somewhat steady and I'd be doing a lot less work, only backlinking the pages that actually need it. I'm trying it out right now to see how long I can last without backlinking. So, as of right now I'm just building one site after another and sitting around impatiently waiting for the sites to rank so I can start making money from them.Different strokes for different folks. So, the question is, if you build sites for organic SEO, which approach do you take and why? And please do not give me the "backlinking like crazy destroys the point of building a site for organic search engine ranking" lecture. I'm well aware of the errors of my ways. |
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| money, quick, sake, sandboxed, sites |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |