Indexing: RSS vs Natural vs Backlinkbooster (juice)

[sirgeo]

Hello fellow warriors, I am a bit of a newb (bout 5 months old in IM years) and am still getting my feet wet. I have gotten some sites to page one of Google which I am really proud of. But honestly I sort of just threw everything at them via trial and error. I am now fine tuning my approach and method and of course the learning never ends, one issue I am on the fence is between having your links found naturally, pinging them via RSS, or using a juicing software like backlink booster or index express. I have read some threads and my guess is that everyone will swear up and down that one vs the other works best. So I guess this is a poll....any advice or thoughts on which is the way to get links found and indexed would be greatly appreciated!

[hurn]

Indexing via Google is the best. That si what Google want

[InitialEffort]

Try Backlink Energizer. Profiles will get indexed at a rate of about 10%, other forms of links will usually get indexed by Google over time. But this doesn't mean that you shouldn't create additional links to your backlinks to help increase the authority.

Think about how many links are made on the internet and no one links to that page. Thus the link popularity is low. Therefore increasing the link popularity to even 1, greatly increases it's effectiveness as most spammers don't build links to their links.