![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: London, UK
Posts: 257
Thanks: 22
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
When building links I usually write a few unique articles on established directories which link directly to my money site (tier 1 links), and then use large numbers of lower value links (such as web 2.0 and forum profiles, blog comments, etc.) to link to these articles (tier 2 links). I also do some other links (like profiles and bookmarks, random links on high PR pages) to add a wider range of links to my money site. In my experience this seems to work well - although I'm open to any advice from more experienced Warriors. The articles that link to my money site all have my target key phrase as anchor text. My question is: does it matter what the anchor text of of the tier 2 links (the ones that link to the articles) is? Should it be the same as the key phrase I'm targeting or can it be anything - e.g. just "click here"? Is there any benefit/disadvantage either way? I would be very grateful for some advice with this! Thanks.
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: London, UK
Posts: 257
Thanks: 22
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
Does anyone have any advice on this please?
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Advanced Warrior Join Date: May 2011 Location: London
Posts: 708
Thanks: 8
Thanked 56 Times in 55 Posts
|
I would say it doesn't matter that much due to the dilution of PR passed through the teirs but if you can, keep the anchor relavent to the content that it is pointing at. Or target keywords that you want the articles to rank for. If they are the same as the money site target then you are effectively competing against yourself so maybe use variations of the money site target.
|
|
Find permanent and contract IT Jobs in Europe 1000's of IT Contract Jobs in the UK live now To search 10000's of IT Jobs in the UK click here | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Marketing Consultant War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 338
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
|
You need multiple sites that you build a lot of crappy links to your lower sites, and then the lower sites point up to the money site. Like a pyramid.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,104
Thanks: 16
Thanked 117 Times in 87 Posts
|
I use the same anchor text or variations of the anchor text that I am targeting even in Tier 2 links. So if I am trying to rank for "blue boats" I will backlink with blue boats to my web 2.0 properties, which have a backlink to my money site with blue boats.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: London, UK
Posts: 257
Thanks: 22
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,104
Thanks: 16
Thanked 117 Times in 87 Posts
|
I'm honestly not sure if it makes any difference. I just do it because it seems logical and it's not like any web 2.0 property is going to outrank my main site when it is sending a link there for the same keyword and will have far fewer links.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 46
Thanks: 104
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I do linkbuilding same as you. I use spun article for article submission sites (tier-1), for tier-2 I do social bookmarking with targeted keywords as anchor text. Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #9 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: London, UK
Posts: 257
Thanks: 22
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| build, links, tiered |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |