![]() | | ||||||||
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you consider using it? | |||
| Yes, just to publish articles to get backlinks. | | 4 | 66.67% |
| Yes, just to get content. | | 0 | 0% |
| Yes, to get both content and publish articles for backlinks. | | 1 | 16.67% |
| No. | | 1 | 16.67% |
| Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
|
I'm sure many of you here know of SEOLinkVine.. it's a network that lets publishers get free content via XML-RPC API and writers publish articles to those sites for links. I believe the future of SEO would be comprised of large networks such as those. With forum profiles, article directories, blog comments, and other web 2.0 sites, it's quite easy for Google to pick up on those links and apply a ban (like the panda update). We all want an easy link. And easy things never pay off. (Like sittin' on a couch all day watching TV or getting spammy links to boost our ranks) I believe SEOlinkvine is still pretty bad because: 1) spun content usually spits out utter crap 2) it's $69 a month, which is quite expensive for most people Now think about it. What if, instead of publishing articles to an article directory that then gets syndicated around, your article gets distributed directly to a website as if the website owner published it him/herself. Clearly, you would have to write (or hire someone to write) good articles. But, look at the bright side, you get in-content dofollow links for as long as that site stays up. You know if you write a good article your link will stick around (and probably get linked to too!) The only problem is, networks like seolinkvine are probably filled with crappy, low-quality sites... which is the biggest problem that I see with that type of network. However, what if you could control the quality and not allow crappy sites in? Would you consider joining the network? Please vote. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,165
Thanks: 38
Thanked 210 Times in 144 Posts
|
If you're going to bash a service at least make it one you've used. I don't use SEO linkvine, never have, but you singled it out for some reason. Then you go on to say things like it's "probably" made of poor quality sites. And you "believe" such and such to be true. If you have a beef with them, deal with them don't bring it here and act like this post is anything else. |
|
Keyword Mastery Exposed For Free at Goalyard.com Go See The Video Now. Guaranteed To Blow Your Mind. Click Here By The Way There Is Some Other Cool Stuff Too In This TOP SECRET category. | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: U.S. Gulf Coast...
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 119 Thanks: 167
Thanked 192 Times in 158 Posts
|
I voted yes, but only with a private network...no exceptions...
|
| | |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
| Quote:
What I was talking about is a network that monitors quality very closely, because LinkVine doesn't do that. Also, if anything, I'm spreading LinkVine awareness. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| backlinks, build, network, sites, vote |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |