I was able to build 97 backlinks for 3 days, is this good or bad?

[daweelmac]

my blog is a week old and i was able to build 97 backlinks just for 3 days.

now my question is, is this thing "natural" for google or not?... i'm afraid i might get deindex by google....

i have read many blogs that says i should limit my backlinks for 10 per day but i have read also blogs which says i should build backlinks as many as i can.

which is which?..

sorry, i'm a newbie in blogging and SEO...

[TBInternetMarketing]

In my opinion, natural to Google will be based on consistency. I.e., if you want to build 90 links in 3 days, then you should aim to build 90 links every 3 days.

Just try to keep it consistent. Whether it's 3 links per day, 30 links per day, or 100 links per day. Try to keep it at a nice steady pace. Obviously Google won't find them all at the same time, so it doesn't have to be spot on, but just keep at it.

[faceblogger]

Generally 97 backlinks in 3 days sounds ok.

[dburk]

Hi daweelmac,

I think you are worried about the wrong things. Google doesn't care if you get 10 or 10,0000 meritorious backlinks all in one day, as long as they are all meritorious. Likewise, keeping web spam to a low volume or a consistent frequency isn't going to prevent Google from finding and devaluing it all.

My advice to you would be to stop worrying about whether you have too many backlinks too fast, and worry more about whether they are all meritorious.

[JSProjects]

Don't worry. 97 is not even close to being a high number. There are plenty of people who create literally thousands a day. (Lower quality, sure.) But, IMO, as long as you remain somewhat consistent it's fine.

[englandrm]

Yeah as someone said in the second post. You can honestly build as many links as you want, but keep the velocity going.

That means keep a consistency of links being built to your site for an extended period of time. Let them get found naturally as well (dont ping).

If you're building links, make sure they are high PR links or at least niche related.

97 is not too many. For a new site I'd recommend about 100 high quality links week for the first few weeks, and then you can increase it from there.

[supernal]

If you did this by yourself, manually, good. If you did this with a tool or paid service, not as great.

[strategic seo services]

Originally Posted by supernal

If you did this by yourself, manually, good. If you did this with a tool or paid service, not as great.

That's true. 97 is an excellent number if you did it all manually.

[bsb85my]

It's real good. But if those are quality backlinks, they definitely will be better

[juhasan]

I guess number is not the point here, quality and reputation of those sites matters.

[SerKur]

It is cool. If those are the quality backlinks then it is more cool.

[paulgl]

Sorry, but I'm not going to build 97 backlinks every 3 days for the rest
of my life. What the heck does google care about consistency for?
Nobody seems to know the word, "viral" anymore. Heaven forbid
if on one day I get thousands dues to certain things out of my control.
Then go to zero...Where is the logic?

If I had to build the same number of backlinks forever, I'd go friggin nuts.

And waste a whole lotta time.

Paul

[Brigitte Mehr]

97 in 3 days is a good start. You need to concentrate on the quality and relevancy more than the quantity. Make sure you get some good anchor text ones using your main keywords and make sure you get a variety of sources and types of sources eg blog comments, forum posting, articles, blog posts, social media commenting. Then make sure you build consistently over time.

[egoldzone]

I think very good result

[unnatural]

I find Google gets more credit than they deserve in these kind of situations. I've had new sites go viral almost overnight and get thousands of links in a short period with nothing but (good) benefits.

It's pretty hard for Google to tell the difference between a website naturally getting a lot of links in a short period, or someone "building" a lot of links in a short period; as long as you take some basic precautions (like varying anchor text).

Logic dictates that if they can't tell it apart they can't afford to make it a huge factor in ranking or they risk not including sites that really are *popular* and people are expecting to see in the results.

[viryabosmith]

Originally Posted by supernal

If you did this by yourself, manually, good. If you did this with a tool or paid service, not as great.

Well said.

[online4cash]

Yeah Its Good Dear......!!
Google Doesn't Deindexed You...!!

[lingoway]

Originally Posted by TBInternetMarketing

In my opinion, natural to Google will be based on consistency. I.e., if you want to build 90 links in 3 days, then you should aim to build 90 links every 3 days.

Just try to keep it consistent. Whether it's 3 links per day, 30 links per day, or 100 links per day. Try to keep it at a nice steady pace. Obviously Google won't find them all at the same time, so it doesn't have to be spot on, but just keep at it.

I am agree with this statement.

[seoguru0]

In my opinion its good to have 97 back links in 3 days.. keep working for more and more..

[ThereIsAlwaysHOPE]

That's an average of around 30 links per day. In my opinion that won't raise any red flags.

You're well in the clear. No problems there

[crescendo]

I think 97 backlinks in 3 days. Fare enough

[ARVolund]

Originally Posted by supernal

If you did this by yourself, manually, good. If you did this with a tool or paid service, not as great.

Originally Posted by strategic seo services

That's true. 97 is an excellent number if you did it all manually.

Originally Posted by viryabosmith

Well said.

What a bunch of BS......

Do you think Google somehow is spying on your computer and watching how you are making links?? Seriously??

Is Google going to know that someone from odesk made your links instead of you?? You really think that is possible?

Is Google going to be able to tell that the 100 web 2.0 properties I just created today using one of my bots were made by software and not by a live person? Again Seriously??

If you really believe that I know of a bridge for sale, Cheap......

Google has no way of knowing how your links were made.

Using automation or outsourcing has nothing to do with how Google how it views your links.

[ARVolund]

To answer your question 97 links in three days is not even close to being an issue.

One point that has already been mentioned is link velocity. What you do not want to do is build a huge number of links (and 97 is not huge) and then stop.

The best thing to do for a brand new website is figure out how many links you can build or outsource on a weekly basis.

Then you start at half that number and gradually increase to your maximum over the course of a couple of months.

The gradual increase is what is important not the absolute number. If your max is 100 links a week than go for it, if it is 10k that is fine as well.

You just do not want to build a lot of links and then stop dead in the water.

Originally Posted by daweelmac

my blog is a week old and i was able to build 97 backlinks just for 3 days.

now my question is, is this thing "natural" for google or not?... i'm afraid i might get deindex by google....

i have read many blogs that says i should limit my backlinks for 10 per day but i have read also blogs which says i should build backlinks as many as i can.

which is which?..

sorry, i'm a newbie in blogging and SEO...

[daweelmac]

thanks... your answers helped me a lot!

[JamesGw]

97 in 3 days is just fine. I typically pump out just under a hundred a day, manually.

[frank07]

97 links within 3 days is good. But the problem is 10% of them count by Search Engine, it mean less than 10 links per 3 days. So you must increase the rate of index link, you can do by ping, convert links to single RSS and submit to RSS directories...If not your work will be useless. My 2 cents.

[presynaras]

How did you do it and how do I do it? One week old newbie, you shall hereforth be the guru to a six month oldbie

[high_plains_drifter]

i dont get how building backlinks CONSISTENTLY is considered natural.

Surely from a natural point of view its not very natural that each day you will get visitors to a certain page and out of those visitors so many will be a webmaster that links back to that page.

Being completely random with link building would seem much more natural to google????

[ARVolund]

Originally Posted by high_plains_drifter

i dont get how building backlinks CONSISTENTLY is considered natural.

Surely from a natural point of view its not very natural that each day you will get visitors to a certain page and out of those visitors so many will be a webmaster that links back to that page.

Being completely random with link building would seem much more natural to google????

Somewhat true but Google does not find all your links as soon as you create them and when it finds your links is the important part. Personally I do weekly planning not daily and the numbers are never exact so there is some natural variation in what Google is going to find on any given day.


I build the links for any particular site 1-3 times a week not daily, really it is to much trouble to try and do every site every day and I have not noticed that it makes any difference.

[jobs]

What is deindexed ? its new to me

[RevSEO]

97 links in 3 days? You've got nothing to worry about.

As others have mentioned, keep up the number of links if possible and continue to build content. Building links in a natural and regular fashion will help your rankings over the course of a few months.

Keep in mind that you'll want to make sure that there are some solid high PR backlinks and not only low PR links.

[unlimitedwealth]

Having blasted 97 links does not equate to having 97 links indexed immediately. It you leave them to be indexed naturally, don't see a problem.

[highave1]

Okay, 97 back links in 3 days; it not a huge amount: no need to worry keep it up. better if you're going to rss those back links.Try to build quality back links do not focus on quantity

[FrFai]

Originally Posted by paulgl

Sorry, but I'm not going to build 97 backlinks every 3 days for the rest
of my life. What the heck does google care about consistency for?
Nobody seems to know the word, "viral" anymore. Heaven forbid
if on one day I get thousands dues to certain things out of my control.
Then go to zero...Where is the logic?

If I had to build the same number of backlinks forever, I'd go friggin nuts.

And waste a whole lotta time.

Paul

Well said.

I mainly concentrate on QUALITY backlinks and build about 5-10 QUALITY backlinks per week AND even give a gap for week or two. I am too lazy . As long as my sites are ranking I don't care about consistency.

I do make profile backlinks, blog comments (LQ) etc for the sake of diversity. I don't go crazy for these types backlinks. I keep it simple

AND for the OP, I would say you don't have to worry. It's just 97 backlinks.

My advise to you, (if the 97 links are of low quality). Try to concentrate on getting quality backlinks rather than wasting your time and energy on building low quality backlinks.

[jennifermartinez]

Google is more quality specific than quantity specific. If those backlinks are of good quality then it is good, but if 97 backlinks are not of good quality then you should worry. Frankly 97 backlinks in 3 days is just fine.

[dagaul101]

There are no set rules, but you should limit it to the ones that you feel it is physically/manually possible to do within a certain time frame