![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Still im untangible War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: London
Posts: 559
Thanks: 68
Thanked 52 Times in 36 Posts
|
it sounds daft i know but im just wondering whats the best way to do this Basically i have a list of herbs i want to add to a page on my blog for reference purposes. The list is on wiki, just a list of words All i want to copy is the list and then create a reference page on my site that i can link people to when im talking about herbs on other pages. I cant really think of how i can make this page unique....its just a list of herbs, all the words will be the same is it ok to do this? should i include source i got it from on the bottom of the page so google know i not just trying to steal it? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| LC Articles War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: U.K
Posts: 95
Thanks: 2
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
I don't see anything wrong with this as long as you clearly give a reference and credit to wikipedia, not sure if google would see it differently though, can anyone clarify this?
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| WSOReportCard.com War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Oklahoma, US
Posts: 977
Thanks: 378
Thanked 134 Times in 97 Posts
|
If you just copy the list, it's going to be duplicate content. However, if you add more content to this page other than just the list, you would probably be fine. Also, mix up the order of the list if you can. Do give a reference back, just for nothing other than being a good net citizen. Google won't be able to read that as a reference, though. It will just read as a link. An important note on this as well - In reality, if it is just one page of many on your site and you are not worried about that particular page ranking well, it's not going to hurt you from a duplicate content standpoint. |
| | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Plundering the Web War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: , , .
Posts: 4,851
Thanks: 804
Thanked 1,200 Times in 887 Posts
|
you can take just about anything off of wikipedia. It's hardly anything that's copyrighted. In fact, they pride themselves on this. The only thing you can't copy is their logo, and of course anything copyrighted that idiotic users ad. That's the whole point of wikipedia. To give free use to anyone to change or add anything without worrying about a copyright. Is it smart to use some of the stuff? I once copied a list, modified it slightly. Beats reinventing the wheel. Paul |
| How to Make Money off Facebook: Login to your account. Deactivate your account. Get your butt to work.
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: California
Posts: 33
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
I think duplicate content is more of a threat when its a whole paragraph.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Still im untangible War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: London
Posts: 559
Thanks: 68
Thanked 52 Times in 36 Posts
|
ok thanks, i think ill just add the list and give a note back to wikipedia, over the next week or 2 ill just add a few paragraphs describing each herb and what they are good for. The rest of my site is unique so i doubt it will be too much of a problem |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| content, copying, wikipedia |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |