![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 158
Thanks: 17
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I remember reading about linkwheels as a legitimate ranking strategy years ago but haven't heard much about it lately. Do linkwheels still work to help your web pages rank better for your keywords, or does Google see them as manipulation and consequently doesn't give them much worth anymore?
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 520
Thanks: 34
Thanked 39 Times in 33 Posts
|
Many people are still not clear of what a linkwheel means. Linkwheel works if implemented correctly. If you have many links pointing to one website then that is not a link wheel. Search engines are clever enough to understand the intention. . |
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
Peramid Linkwheels are working good these days and still you have to use your mind not to leave any foot print. I have purchased private proxies to creat linkwheels and for other link building stuff that seems more natural to search engines. try to post 3-4 articles in your web 2.0 to make it natural. any thing else you want to know ? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Denmark
Posts: 90
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Maybe, only google knows for sure, imo.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Wordsmith (& Skepchick) War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,298
Thanks: 8,673
Thanked 11,419 Times in 5,809 Posts
|
Opinions will differ, Laura. Two things I can tell you factually (though they're only factual reports of opinion) ... (i) The members here who have previously worked on search engine algorithms have all always said in earlier threads about this that linkwheels recognisable as such don't and won't work at all; (ii) The authors of the standard, widely accredited SEO textbooks say that linkwheels recognisable as such don't and won't work at all. And three more things which are my own opinion only ... (a) Some sort of vaguely link-pyramid-ish structure which additionally includes some randomised cross-links may work; (b) There certainly won't be any downside or "Google penalty risk" to trying anything like this on a "home-made/manual scale"; (c) Call me a skepchick, but in a forum in which so many members sell/promote linkwheels as part of their SEO services, it may be a little difficult to gather objective information, and with no disrespect to anyone, the consensus of opinion may not be an altogether independent one. |
| Alexa Smith ... ... writes stuff that snaps, crackles and pops, even if it's only about cauliflowers. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 155
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
Anything that is not grey and black hat will forever work. |
| | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 73
Thanked 132 Times in 121 Posts
|
Link wheels will most certainly have some effect. Whether or not Google's algorithm can pick up on them is up for debate. I can all but guarantee that they'd be easily picked up during a manual review, which could get your site deindexed. Justin Briggs had a nice article on SEOmoz regarding link spam detection. You can check it out here: Better Understanding Link-based Spam Analysis Techniques | SEOmoz. It might provide some valuable insight. That said, I agree with most of what Alexa said in this instance. Pyramid-style links with some cross linking (maybe 5-15%) would be ideal. Don't be afraid to link your main site to a one or two of your supporting sites, either. The idea is to create as large of a web as possible. Avoid bottlenecks. |
| | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| internet savvy Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Singapore
Posts: 17
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
I agree with your looks about link wheel, it is the best way of promoting your site in a white hat way. Thanks! | |
| | ||
| | |
| | #9 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 383
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
|
Hmm, I'm not sure I even understand what a link wheel is. I guess it's links in a circle which point to your site and each other. I usually write articles, then make links to those articles from social bookmarking sites, maybe linking sideways, as well as in a line to my site. I guess that's a link pyramid with cross linkng. Generally, if it makes sense to you as natural, then it makes sense to Google.
|
| Affordable Social Media Marketing Effective social marketing services. Facebook welcome pages, Twitter followers, social sharing and more. Facebook Page Likes Ten dollars gets you over 500 likes, talk to me about a bulk order. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Hungry Hippo Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Houston
Posts: 104
Thanks: 11
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
| |
| It's Time To Start A Website You OWN | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 158
Thanks: 17
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Great info everyone, thanks for the insight.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada U.S.A.
Posts: 170
Blog Entries: 37 Thanks: 29
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
|
Linkwheels will work if they aren't too direct, you now have to create sub linkwheels within the main linkwheel leading back to your site. It is almost enough to make your head spin. LoL
|
|
FREE Report Reveals 5 Secrets To Earn Truckloads Of Affiliate Marketing Cash In Less Than A Week! How To Do The Marketing | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Black Ninja Optimizer Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 96
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #14 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 61
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
| |
| | |
| | #15 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: SoCal/NY/MD
Posts: 430
Thanks: 118
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
|
meh, they still work, would you want your sole linkbuilding to be just link wheels heck no.
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Desmond Ong Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: New York
Posts: 10
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Although keyword is low competitive. after panda effect i build some link wheel for my site with some spoke. i keep my site on Primary link wheel target & now my site is on the top on SE.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Hoist King War Room Member |
yeah, still works. Links are links. Treat it like that
|
![]() ✔✔✔The HOIST Is Here!✔✔✔ A Backlink Service That BOOSTS Rankings...NOW Better Than Ever! See REAL Results From Fellow Warriors ✔✔✔SEO Competitive Research Service!✔✔✔ Follow us on Twitter for Quick Coupons! | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 340
Thanks: 35
Thanked 33 Times in 32 Posts
|
I do not sell SEO. What I do is I use link wheels on a small scale and it definitely works for long tail keywords - and unique content. Then again, I am pretty sure any type of linking with unique content would work anyway. ![]() I'm not sure what people talking about sometimes. If you mean spammy, useless pages with spun content/machine-made gibberish in a link wheel then I don't know if that would work or not. Probably not but then again any type of spammy link scheme is dubious at best anyway. What I do is like this, for example: Post on money site < Short Blogger post with link and pics < Livejournal post (posting to journal and LJ community where actual people read it < More blog posts, different websites, Squidoo, Triond (some unique some not) < Forum posts/forum blogs |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Super Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: AU
Posts: 383
Thanks: 20
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
|
Linkwheels are still one of the best ways to build links to a site. But don't ONLY use linkwheels, obviously.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Wordsmith (& Skepchick) War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,298
Thanks: 8,673
Thanked 11,419 Times in 5,809 Posts
| Well, please excuse questions about what you've said, Lyanna, but ... (i) How do you know, and what makes it so "definite"? ![]() (ii) Why would the fact that they're "long tail keywords" make the slightest difference? You're surely not suggesting that if Google's algorithm sees the highly detectable footprint of a linkwheel, it stops to analyse the keywords in question and then thinks to itself "Oooh, well, this linkwheel was built for a long-tail keyword with low search volume, so we'll count all the backlinks involved here and not disqualify them"?! How on Earth could this make any difference? Please excuse the interrogatory tone, but you're really making a very remarkable assertion, here. To put it mildly, it's extremely difficult to envisage either why or how that could possibly be the case, isn't it? ![]() (iii) Why would the fact the content involved is/isn't "unique" be relevant in any way? Again, for this to be true, it would have to be the case that the linkjuice value of a backlink would depend on whether the content to which it's attached has previously been published elsewhere online! This is something which even people selling spinning software don't allege. It's a really inexplicable claim, if you think about it, isn't it? |
| Alexa Smith ... ... writes stuff that snaps, crackles and pops, even if it's only about cauliflowers. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| linkwheels, work |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |