![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| The Wordbay Guy War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,532
Thanks: 185
Thanked 315 Times in 191 Posts
|
Just analysing the competition for a keyword where I seem to be stuck forever on mid-page 2, despite much more effective SEO than most of the competition. The pattern I am seeing with sites (actually, mostly inner pages, like mine) outranking mine is: 1) Domain age - 10 year-old site is at no. 1 despite very few inbound links to that subpage and no on-page SEO (Title, Desc, H1 etc.) - also has a YHD listing. 2) DMOZ and YHD listing - sites (again, inner pages) high on page 10 with little more than a domain listing in these directories. 3) Backlinks are a poor third - sites with thousands of crappy backlinks, and even some solid off-page work are only on mid-page 1. 4) The only semi-EMD is on page 2, just above me, so that hasn't helped them too much. Also, most of the page one competition has VERY few keyword-optimised anchor links in their BL profile - interesting, huh? So again, it seems age, and high-authority directory listings are not to be sniffed at... Thoughts? |
| | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Keyword Extraordinaire War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: England, UK
Posts: 836
Thanks: 90
Thanked 90 Times in 76 Posts
|
What is the PR of these pages like? I bet they're all PR 3 and above.
|
| Selling Exact Match Domain Websites With PR and Traffic - PM Me For List Explode Your Sales w/ Video Sales Letters $27 Each - 100% Positive Reviews [WSO] Keyword Research Like A Boss! - Review Copies Available | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| The Wordbay Guy War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,532
Thanks: 185
Thanked 315 Times in 191 Posts
| Quote:
But I think their PR is a direct result of these factors I have mentioned.Actually, there is a PR0, some PR1s and then PR2s and PR3s, so even that is not really as significant as it should be. And I always think that high-PRs can be beaten eventually (and I will, make no mistake ) as they are not always very well optimised off-page and on for the target keywords. So I still think those basic authority factors (age etc.) play a major role.I also have a crazy little theory about "keyword age" - that ranking changes are much slower for "evergreen" keywords, i.e. those where rankings have not historically changed much over a long period of time. It would make sense that Google will favour the status quo with those kinds of ranking. I would be happy for anyone to blow my "keyword age" theory out of the water | |
| | ||
| | |
| | #4 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
same case i have.... just waiting for good solution
|
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| age, dmoz, domain, factors, ranking, underestimate, yhd |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |