![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| In search of knowledge Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: N. Ireland, the Golfing capital of the world
Posts: 467
Thanks: 63
Thanked 51 Times in 46 Posts
|
Just read a few articles on how Google favors faster loading sites. According to the "Page Speed" add-on for Firebug my WP sites have an average performance of around 65% Is this as good a way of measuring uploading time as any other? Can shared hosting provide faster speeds? And, how can I improve my sites speed? Do I require a cache plugin? Any help appreciated. |
| | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| SEO Strategist War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,532
Thanks: 355
Thanked 1,992 Times in 1,273 Posts
|
Go to Google Webmaster Tools & do the speed test, this way you know exactly how fast G thinks your page/url is loading. It doesn't matter how fast any other tools besides G says your page is loading, G owns Google SERPs, go to the source... |
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| SEO Strategist War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,532
Thanks: 355
Thanked 1,992 Times in 1,273 Posts
|
What I was talking about above is the Fetch as Googlebot tool inside GWT, for some reason when I click the Fetch button all it does is refresh my browser window, not sure why? Anyways, I'm pretty sure that tool included the amount of time it takes to fetch the page, If you can get it to work. |
| | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| In search of knowledge Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: N. Ireland, the Golfing capital of the world
Posts: 467
Thanks: 63
Thanked 51 Times in 46 Posts
|
Ran 5 home pages through the Fetch as Googlebot in WMT and noted the times they range from 0.23 to 0.53 seconds. Is this acceptable? OR is it a matter of checking out the competiton in respective niches and simply matching them? In either case, how do I improve speed? |
| | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| SEO Strategist War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,532
Thanks: 355
Thanked 1,992 Times in 1,273 Posts
|
This plugin will speed up your WP (Wordpress) site. http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-minify/ What it does is, removes all the white space (blank lines etc...) in your sites source code (html + CSS + Javascript), this makes for a lot less work when trying to load the web page in a browser. I just now tested one of my own sites with this plugin. The plugin condensed the html from 1174 lines of html to 133 lines of html code. You can notice the load time for the web page, it is faster. |
| | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Keyword Extraordinaire War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: England, UK
Posts: 836
Thanks: 90
Thanked 90 Times in 76 Posts
|
If you're using a wordpress site then WP Super Cache is great for increasing load speed as well.
|
| Selling Exact Match Domain Websites With PR and Traffic - PM Me For List Explode Your Sales w/ Video Sales Letters $27 Each - 100% Positive Reviews [WSO] Keyword Research Like A Boss! - Review Copies Available | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Myth Fighter Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Philippines
Posts: 105
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
Images with big files and plugins are commonly the cause of slow down of a site. Removing images with big files, or replacing them with a smaller one is a good way to speed up a site.
|
| | |
| | #9 | ||||
| In search of knowledge Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: N. Ireland, the Golfing capital of the world
Posts: 467
Thanks: 63
Thanked 51 Times in 46 Posts
|
yukon, Definitely going to give this a go. BTW I just downloaded the pdf in your sig strip on internal linking - very interesting. Thanks for all the help in this thread. Quote:
Checking out caching plugins now. Think I'll try WP Super Cache on one site and W3 Total Cache on another. Quote:
Certainly worth a try Josh - an obvious thing to try I suppose but I wouldn't have thought to do so. Quote:
Going to take one of the home pages and condense all the images and see how that affects timing. Quote:
Does anyone know what sort of loading time we should be aiming for? How long is the average surfer willing to wait and is it true that loading time is directly related to bounce rate, click throughs, conversions, etc? | ||||
| | |||||
| | |
| | #10 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 457
Thanks: 131
Thanked 70 Times in 55 Posts
|
I wouldn't spend too much time worrying about this, as long as your site is within reason, you'll be fine. Just get a nice theme, don't use too many plugins and widgets, get a reliable hosting provider and you'll be fine. |
| | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 422
Thanks: 2
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
|
I read somewhere that excess plugins that you don't really need could slow website down
|
| | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Sweden
Posts: 76
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
I have had really good experience with the plugin Hyper Cache. No matter what you run on, cache will most likely speed up your page and lessen the burden on the webserver.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 111 Times in 62 Posts
| Quote:
- Script Compressor (for CSS and Javascript) - W3 Total Cache - WP Smush.it (really helped my site) Besides this, I switched over to pro hosting for Bluehost (needed to anyway) and I think it helped a bit. Also, keep an eye on the plugins you keep active, sometimes a plugin can really slow you down. My copy of SEOPressor actually messed up my load times a lot so I deactivated it because it's a useless plugin anyway | |
| | ||
| | |
| | #14 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 457
Thanks: 131
Thanked 70 Times in 55 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Super Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: AU
Posts: 383
Thanks: 20
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
|
I use WP Cache and run everything on a VPS to try and get a faster load time. And I also try to avoid anything to do with Javascript. |
| | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 50
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
For my heaviest sites I use Hyper Cache and DB Cache Reloaded Fix, both plugins really made a difference on the speed of my site. The drawback is that since both are caching different things you need to manually erase the cache if you make changes, because one won't let the other see the changes. A minnor annoyance but it is well worth it. |
| Last edited by XIIIzen; 08-12-2011 at 07:49 PM. Reason: Typo on a plugin name... | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Philippines
Posts: 94
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #18 |
| Banned Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,400
Thanks: 17
Thanked 95 Times in 93 Posts
|
You should install this plugin WordPress › W3 Total Cache « WordPress Plugins with the help of this plugin your site will load much faster...and remember If you are not hosting in Hostgator and bluehost then first contact your hosting provider and ask them if they support this kind of plugin...
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,935
Thanks: 106
Thanked 269 Times in 201 Posts
| |
| I am now taking on full-time SEO clients. PM me for more information. . | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Some Random Noob War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 734
Thanks: 172
Thanked 37 Times in 35 Posts
|
Defrag all files on your website. It will helps alot.
|
| My CPA Journal CPA Daily Earning: $2.25 (ytd: $0.9) (increase) Cost: still remain zero Work Time: 2 to 6 hours a day. CPA Network: Peerfly Method: Social Media >> Blogspot >> Land Page | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| In search of knowledge Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: N. Ireland, the Golfing capital of the world
Posts: 467
Thanks: 63
Thanked 51 Times in 46 Posts
|
Ok, This is fantastic, all the helpful suggestions. I've performed a quick test on two sites. Both the same size, age , theme, structure and running on the same hosting account. One with WP Super Cache & Wp Minify and the other with W3 Total Cache (which has a minify option included.) Both sites saw nearly a 20% jump in performance according to the Page Speed Firebug add-on. I'm very happy. I guess W3 T Cache is the superior option if you know what you're doing. WP Super is very easy to configure and suited me just fine. |
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| sites, speed |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |