![]() | | ||||||||
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Tool Is In Your Opinion Correct? | |||
| Link-Assistant's Rank Tracker | | 1 | 100.00% |
| SEO Book's Rank Tracker | | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Advanced Warrior Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: , , Israel.
Posts: 562
Thanks: 123
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
I have used SEO Book's Rank Tracker and LInk-Assistant Rank Tracker free version to check rankings of 5 keywords and i see discrepancies: ![]() What is strange is that when i check rankings for one of keywords from my Firefox browser, i see the correct rankings for Link-Assistant Rank Tracker and not SEO Book's Rank Tracker. Does it have anything to do with random Google data centers? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 103
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
interesting... i'd be curious to see what specific ranking Link Assistant rank tracker shows when you set it to specify rankings beyond 100. I am sure they are decently accurate but that would make for a better comparison of the two tools. also for testing purposes, try disabling SE data centers rotation in LA rank tracker and make sure your universal search feature is off. as for the other rank checker, haven't used it but did hear good things about it. so it's nice to have it reviewed in detail here. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| book, discrepancy, link-assistant, linkassistant, rank, rankings, seo, seo book, tracker |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |