![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: NYC
Posts: 70
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Is there a way to measure the power of a link? Is it even quantifiable? If there's a method or tool that can do this do tell. Thanks in advance! |
| | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Bradford, England
Posts: 330
Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 26
Thanked 135 Times in 62 Posts
|
Only google knows the true value of link juice, there are ways to guestimate how much a link will be worth to you but no, it's not quantifiable and I've never found a tool for it.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Nope. You can look at the page's PR, and tools like SeoMoz's open site explorer, but there's no certain way to do this, nope. |
| Follow me as I build my content publishing business from $0 to a full time income. "The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value." - Thomas Paine | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Banned War Room Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: UK
Posts: 164
Thanks: 32
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
The only advice I can give here is this: Go to the site here Backlinks Checker Tool - Backlink Watch Tyoe in your site and write down all the links that point to your site. Head over to the site here PageRank Checker Tool, Multiple PageRank Checker, and PageRank Display enter in all the URLs that point to you and gage the page rank of the backlink giving page. This will give you some indication. You can also work out the value using the table here: Smart PageRank - Google PR Calulation Chart Thanks. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 100
Thanks: 8
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
|
Link juice isn't even a real name for anything. It's just an abstract idea that represents the potential of backlinks (for want of a better description). So the short answer is no, there is no way to measure it. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Banned War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Ash Fork
Posts: 107
Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: U.S. Gulf Coast...
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 119 Thanks: 167
Thanked 192 Times in 158 Posts
|
Probably the closest you could come would be to divide the the PR value by the number of links on the page including on-site links. This will give you a very, very rough estimate. I do not know for sure, but I am betting that it is much more dynamic than that being that some links are structural and some are contextual. Lots and lots of grey area there. |
| | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Drunken Greek War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Greece
Posts: 9,976
Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 2,191
Thanked 4,166 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
You're wasting your time even worrying about it - PR is one of some 200 pus factors that determine actual SERPS ranking.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Wordsmith (& Skepchick) War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,299
Thanks: 8,675
Thanked 11,419 Times in 5,809 Posts
| "A link", probably not, really. Yes, but only collectively, approximately and gradually. It doesn't suit people wanting immediate answers and certainty. It's actually not that difficult, over periods of time, to test out - approximately and collectively - the effects of numbers of different types of backlinks, and form a reasonably reliable impression of "what works" for you. The differences between types/places of backlinks can sometimes be really overwhelming and almost unmissable, if you do it enough times. It's time-consuming, and suits analytical people better than others, but it can be both very interesting and very worthwhile. It's fairly easily possible (albeit not quickly), from doing so, for example, to confirm that in general information common to many "standard SEO textbooks" is actually pretty reliable (especially when compared with "typical online information"). The most interesting part of the exercise is perhaps analysing the reasons for that. Some are all-too-obvious; others very much less so. |
| Alexa Smith ... ... writes stuff that snaps, crackles and pops, even if it's only about cauliflowers. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| juice, link, measure |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |