| | ||||||||
| |||||||||
 |
09-16-2011, 01:18 PM
| #1 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|  Pages vs Posts and silo structure
Hi, I've seen different opinions on using pages or posts. Which should I use? I'm referring to timeless content. I'm definately going to use a silo structure, but does it make a difference if I use posts or pages? For example, using posts, but making sure the urls follow a silo structure. Are post categories and tags going to negatively affect a siloed url stucture? Or are there reasons why I should not consider posts for my silo structure at all? |
|  |
|
09-16-2011, 10:06 PM
| #2 | |
| Tap out your job already War Room Member  Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Be sure to wear a flower in your hair
Posts: 376
Thanks: 88
Thanked 98 Times in 63 Posts
| Re: Pages vs Posts and silo structure Quote:
Pages and posts are equivalent in terms of SEO so really you should be considering how easy it'll be to navigate your site for the visitor. I do fine with just pages but a lot of people seem to like to use pages for the primary keywords and then posts interlinking to the pages. As long as your content and backlinks are solid :-) | |
| | ||
|
| |
|
09-17-2011, 07:42 AM
| #3 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Re: Pages vs Posts and silo structure
let's assume all other seo stuff is done...keyword research, good content, meta tags etc... Is there validity to siloing the url in posts if there are already categories and tags?... For example: site.com/silo1 keyword/subkeyword-contentpage1 site.com/silo2 keyword/subkeyword-contentpage2 vs. site.com/keyword-contentpage1 or should the categories and tags serve as the silos? I don't mean to make it complicated...just want to get it right before I end up with a ton of content and can't go back. |
|
| |
 |
|
| Tags |
| pages, posts, silo, structure |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
 |
