![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 93
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Which will be Best to choose, AMR or BMR? Also which will be safe in the eye of Big G? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 457
Thanks: 131
Thanked 70 Times in 55 Posts
|
BMR gets my vote, never had one single issue.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,165
Thanks: 38
Thanked 210 Times in 144 Posts
|
I use both. I think the big advantage of BMR is the index rate is near 100%. But it's tough to beat AMR for sheer volume. I build links to a lot of pages and a lot of keywords, use both extensively, and honestly have no desire to choose. The disadvantages of BMR are the monthly fee, and the fact that you have to generate a lot of content. However, if you're smart about it you can take 4 or 5 posts of BMR, spin em up and submit to AMR. |
|
Keyword Mastery Exposed For Free at Goalyard.com Go See The Video Now. Guaranteed To Blow Your Mind. Click Here By The Way There Is Some Other Cool Stuff Too In This TOP SECRET category. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Peter Sundstrom War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,854
Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 177
Thanked 503 Times in 370 Posts
|
What's best, apples or oranges? In my opinion, both are best as they are different tools and can be used to complement each other. |
| | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Money Never Sleeps War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vegas
Posts: 322
Thanks: 2
Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
|
Another vote for both. They are very different. If I had to pick one though, it would be BMR or something similar by a mile. |
|
Follow me: http://twitter.com/JasonAMartin | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Troy Steele War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,763
Thanks: 723
Thanked 499 Times in 319 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: PlanetSEO
Posts: 101
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
when you compare the prices, AMR is a clear winner. And if you know how to properly use AMR, you can make your site sitting on top.
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 470
Thanks: 1
Thanked 53 Times in 51 Posts
|
BMR for sure.
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| TheAverageGenius.net War Room Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Idaho
Posts: 146
Blog Entries: 2 Thanks: 193
Thanked 51 Times in 33 Posts
|
I've been using AMR and it has no monthly fee - the thing's replaced a lot of my former monthly services like UAW and ArticleRanks, though both those services still work fine (I pay as I go with ArticleRanks, sometimes pay to submit UAW but not so much these days). The reason I've not used BMR (though I'll be testing it in a short while for a month) is that it requires constant writing, whereas what you get with AMR is spin/submit to the full list and rank away (despite what some would have you believe, it works). The benefit is simply having no monthly fee and ranking with AMR and using 1 or 2 spun articles (depending on your KW's)...compared to hashing out 150 words a time per link, I could write one spun article and get hundreds of links. Combine AMR with the Indexing Tool plugin and you're good to go. SO it depends on your budget: AMR is the clear winner there. But BMR works like crazy according to its users - so why not both? They publish links to 2 different types of targets, so if you can get both, do it. |
| My Internet Marketing Failure > Success Story I Am the Author of: CJ Tactics: How to Succeed on CJ.com | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| amr, bmr |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |