![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Norway
Posts: 290
Thanks: 92
Thanked 24 Times in 12 Posts
|
Hi Warriors, I am soon to launch a new company website and as part of the marketing strategy, have targeted a number of keywords. Only 3 of these keywords will be used as web pages on the website (accessible from menu), while the remaining keywords are simply to be picked up by anyone searching via Google. Do you think there is any risk of these pages not ranking well because they are not accessible from my website, or whether there is any risk of being penalized for some unknown reason? Much appreciated, Antony. |
| | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 422
Thanks: 2
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
|
So basically you want some pages with no internal links pointing to them? I don't see a problem with that, they'll just be harder to rank but I'm guessing you're not wanting to rank these pages anyway right?
|
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Norway
Posts: 290
Thanks: 92
Thanked 24 Times in 12 Posts
| Thanks for getting back to me. I actually do want to rank for these keywords since they are basically product/service pages targeting different keywords and it would be silly to place them all within the menu. I might create an "index" page in the footer links with a link to each of these pages which should help boost rankings due to internal linking.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 457
Thanks: 303
Thanked 79 Times in 52 Posts
|
If you have no links pointing to these pages from the Home Page or your category pages, then Google will assume that these pages are less important than the pages you DO have linked to from the home page and/or category pages. So my understanding is that ichl13 is totally right - you will have a harder time ranking for these hidden terms. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Shut up & take my money!! War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 347
Thanks: 1
Thanked 72 Times in 63 Posts
|
Just put them in your sitemap and it should be good. You should consider some internal linking anyway though just so your internal pages can benefit from your main page link building and vice versa
|
| Warrior NEWBIES, I'm a web developer - I'll make you a website! http://949web.com read my FREE guide on setting up your first money-making website Download my latest Free Marketing Guide - 40+ Essential Tools for Web Marketers by Johnny Optimo | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Norway
Posts: 290
Thanks: 92
Thanked 24 Times in 12 Posts
|
Thanks for all of your responses - I will use both suggestions. Perhaps creating an index page, and like Johnny Optimo suggested, make sure they are present in my sitemap. Perhaps it might just take a little more back linking to get them on top of Google. Thanks again! |
| | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,554
Thanks: 83
Thanked 245 Times in 226 Posts
|
Why rank for keywords that are silly, there must be a logical way for the pages to linked within your site, even if it is a reference link within another article. Having orphaned pages is rather uncommon, I have seen on site optimization guides suggest avoiding such pages. "Hidden Pages" usually would be some sort of "Cloaked" pages, in some cases designed to present an image to Google that is less commercial that than the ones visitors see, Google hates that sort of cloaking and sill defiantly penalize a site using that stragety (this is not the case with your ophaned pages) |
|
“An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field” Niels Bohr
| |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Norway
Posts: 290
Thanks: 92
Thanked 24 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #9 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 422
Thanks: 2
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
|
Or why don't you put the pages into categories, with buffer pages acting as category menus. That way you'll at least have some linking towards them? Not sure, just a suggestion
|
| | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Norway
Posts: 290
Thanks: 92
Thanked 24 Times in 12 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| damage, hiding, pages, seo |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |