LOL. Permanent ON page PR links and you wouldn't be interested??

[Clyde]

All I have to say is, things that people will do to sell an ebook never cease to amuse me.

We know you're the "expert" now. The only backlinks worthy of doing is the one you promote, amirite?

I see you ridicule mattlaclear all the time, it amuses me because you guys are two of the same.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clyde

All I have to say is, things that people will do to sell an ebook never cease to amuse me.
.

Another offended closet spammer who can't read? seems to be a trend . I don't sell an ebook and the direct offer that this thread talks about isn't even mine. You pimpin out that signature AND avatar just fine though right? (lol)

[Clyde]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Another offended closet spammer who can't read? seems to be a trend . I don't sell an ebook and the direct offer that this thread talks about isn't even mine. You pimpin out that signature AND avatar just fine though right? (lol)

Come on, not everybody on here are stupid, we can see through your pitch-fest.

Step 1: Make a thread ranting about spammy backlinks.
Step 2: Offer a solution.
Step 3: Solution "happens" to be in signature.

and if people argue with you just challenge them to an SEO "battle" because they can never win because it will never happen, because most people have better things to do than SEO to win a petty $100.

Did I get it right?

I'm a closet spammer? Still can't beat your authority links right? and you'll teach me how to build them for $xxx but I'll need to PM you first because that thing is "invite-only".

I'm out.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clyde

Come on, not everybody on here are stupid, we can see through your pitch-fest.

Newsflash I have been around here longer than you and have had threads where I had no sig at all and disagreed with spamming where people got more upset than they have in this thread. I participated here for over a year with nothing, nada zip selling (even my detractors around long enough will tell you I am an argumentatitive equal opportunity debater with or without a sig) plus again learn to read. the solution offered and linked to IS NOT MINE. As for my sig 9 out of ten people in this thread do not have the money to build their own network. It is NOT the solution for most people.

SO your only claim to fame is that I have a sig but guess what? - so do you (and considerably more tricked out for attention than mine - though I should get one too )so perhaps we know why you are attaching yourself to this thread with nothing of substance to say that relates to the actual subject.

[Clyde]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Okay so there are some people who see the value?

I was wondering because I am about to launch a service that has some of those benefits.

No I saw it here not even a WSO

Guest Post Opportunities On Great Sites. Get Powerful Links FREE!

Maybe its just the section he posted it in.

Enough said.

[Mike Anthony]

Sure I am also doing some marketing research but what did I link to? My own solution or someone elses?

BZZZZ . Someone else's.

You have no point. See me have any opt in form to collect email addresses for any future services (like cough cough someone else....)? Your own sig is pimped out and ready to go although you could have chosen to turn it off.


Nuff said

Now do you have anything to say on this subject or just want to derail it some more and get your sig out there in a popular thread?

[GetKane]

As they say "those that can't...."

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by kaneinsurance

As they say "those that can't...."

.....do SEO try to promote insurance through an IM Forum"? .

Anyway getting back on point that s exactly the issue. You have people wasting time running around building up post count on forums so they can drop links, doing blasts, paying $149 a month to senuke, paying for thousands of article directory blasts and if they just applied themselves they could build a real business with real rankings by concentrating on a little content creation like the offer referred to in this thread which is totally unrelated to me.

if people argue with you just challenge them to an SEO "battle" because they can never win because it will never happen, because most people have better things to do than SEO to win a petty $100.

Really? Is that why because I see ton loads of people who spend all kinds of time writing content endlessly for their MFA and can't make $100 in a month but they don't have the time to look in the serps and find one example of a truly top competitive term that ranks number one with spammy backlinks alone? Uh - huh sure. and in the entire time it took to write three off topic posts in this thread you didn't have the time instead to earn $100 and prove me wrong even though you would LOVE to? You are right about one thing -

Come on, not everybody on here are (or is) stupid

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

You complain about spam but to me nonsens posts like that are far worse than the spammers.

Why is it always about you, lol.

Again (I love it! ) your conditional comments, everything anyone post always triggers silly conditions to your seo theories.

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Get PR5 and 6 backlinks all day long without work? Yeah sure read here "blog comment spam" all day long. Pure and utter garbage evangelized by the lazy to fool the gullible. I'll smoke ANY serp you are in with your blog comments. In fact I'll up the ante. I'll pay A $100 to anyone that can show me where just your PR5 and PR 6 backlinks "that you can get all day long" ranks a site for a very competitive top serp (but I get to pick what is competitive since its my money and I won't allow any "50.000 competing pages" nonsense criteria). this kind of stuff junks up the boards fr more than spammers and some of us are tired of it. Put it to the test.

only wish you would because you are being absolutely clueless.


A) you can create articles on a page that already has PR, Its embarassing to have to tell someone who should know that blogs work far more like CMS when setup without various one side content the other side sidebar layout themes and that people have links and PR on pages that are CATEGORY and FEATURED related. Sheesh, Talk about using the noggin. This is elementary Wordpress 101 stuff.

B) A new page CAN have real PR. Also embarassing to have to tell someone who supposed to know SEO that PR is constantly updated on Google's end even when it is not updated in the tool bar. Even SEO newbs know that toolbar PR is only up todate on the day the PR is updated and real PR changes EVERY day after that constantly.

So if you have a PR 4 home page thats one page and you create a link to another page in navigation that new page will have PR (1, 2 and sometimes even PR3) THE VERY NEXT TIME THE SITE IS CRAWLED. Where it may have very little to speak of is on a site with a ton load of links and navigation (cough cough like cough cough article directories)

But hey don't mind us go charge for make money online or some great and competitive serp with your PR5 and PR6s all day long links. thing is I am not seeing that in any competitive serps because its pure Baloniii.

If a guy sucks at getting easy high PR backlinks without spamming, well, that's their own fault for not learning how to do seo on their own.

I have an idea, since that's all that's being bounced around here, how about you test your own theories & get back with us on how that worked out.

Whatever happend to that last WF seo thread, when all you had to do was spam another site with backlinks to sink them in the SERPs, that theory never panned out either did it (didn't think so).

Finish/Test one theory before starting another...

I kinda understand what's going on here since your learning seo from Matt Cutts (here). You can disbelieve what I'm telling you all you need, but I'll tell you straight up Matt Cutts doesn't have your best interest in mind when he creates his silly videos. Those videos are not about seo, no matter how much you want them to be. Just a heads up.

BTW, You won't smoke anything, we both know that.

Take some time one day & do your own real seo testing, instead of taking shortcuts & getting others to do it for you. I would like to think were all here to help each other with seo, but a guy has to be willing help himself before asking others for help.

[Clyde]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Sure I am also doing some marketing research but what did I link to? My own solution or someone elses?

BZZZZ . Someone else's.

You have no point. See me have any opt in form to collect email addresses for any future services (like cough cough someone else....)? Your own sig is pimped out and ready to go although you could have chosen to turn it off.


Nuff said

Now do you have anything to say on this subject or just want to derail it some more and get your sig out there in a popular thread?

I paid for that sig. Why would I have it turned off when it's perfectly OK to have it on.

What's not OK is starting a thread ridiculing something to pimp out your upcoming service, you did it so fast we couldn't even blink. You dropped it in your second post in this thread.

Whatever you say is only backed by your egoistic tone, and people have smarten up to see through your BS.

I'm outta here.

[yukon]

Originally Posted by paulgl

Interesting thread Mike, but...

There's no guarantee of anything. You are spending your time,
writing what should be a unique article, for someone you don't
know, building their site, with no assurance it will stick around.

Could be a complete waste of time, taken from time you could
be adding to your own sites. I rehash my own articles for
blog posts on my blog. Instant link, staying power, etc.

I would not pay $5 for blog comments.

I say it a lot. Work on your own stuff, 100% of the time. That's
the only way to be assured of staying power for the long run.

Building up someone's site is not my cup of tea. I don't do EZA
either.

The only thing that is 100% sure is your own links on your own
sites/pages.

If someone put a sack of trash in their driveway and put a "free"
sign on it, would you pick it up because it's free?

Paul

That pretty much sums it up, Paul!

Why in the world would someone build site content & give it away for free, that's nuts when they could just build their own backlink site, that won't get deleted. OP has no idea If those links will be around, the site could be flipped etc...

Op, no doubt is pushing something he has an interest in, which is directly related to what OP sells on this forum.

Then OP has the nerve to tell other members they shouldn't have a banner in his thread. Dude this isn't a WSO, & you didn't pay $$ for this thread.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by yukon

Whatever happend to that last WF seo thread, when all you had to do was spam another site with backlinks to sink them in the SERPs,

Still ongoing but it wasn't mine and you know it. I would have done a blast to it which was never done . Nice try at lying like it was my thread or I was doing the blasting. What does that have to do with this topic again?

The rest of your post is just tired nonsense . I learn nothing from Matt Cutts without testing and you don't know anything about getting high quality links outside of spam blog comments or you wouldn't state that writing an article was tooo hard . What? you really think anyone here is stupid enough to believe your PR5 and PR6 all day that takes no work comment besides blasting blog comments? LOL. everyone can see through that malarkey but dance with it some more if you think you are fooling anyone..

Why in the world would someone build site content & give it away for free, that's nuts when they could just build their own backlink site, that won't get deleted

LOL that has got to be one of the silliest arguments I have ever read on these forums. How are these "backlink sites" going to even be found by Google with no exterior links pointing at them??? ROFL. Even with your own network you STILL are reliant on links from other sites to build up juice. Think man. use the noggin like you said. Sooner or later you need SOMEWHERE in the process a link back to your site from another person's property. Your little lousy content means nothing without those links. Any and everything can go away even and especially those blog comments you love so much.

Anyone noticed how silly the he's trying to sell his services argument is now? If I were just selling I'd agree with Yukon since building your own backlinks sites is all that is my sig.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clyde

I paid for that sig. Why would I have it turned off when it's perfectly OK to have it on.

What's not OK is starting a thread ridiculing something to pimp out your upcoming service,

Come on Clyde stop with the dishonesty and get back to the thread topic. You have yet to add one single thing about the topic. Just one derail after another while pretending not to have the time to take up my $100 challenge. You like everyone else here uses their thread signature. You would hardly pay for an upgrade if you didn't use it for just the purpose you are now using it for by keeping it on. Pot meet kettle.

I will point out any service I see fit to talk about and there is not a thing you can do about it. It was not my own service and I linked to none of my sites or services. My services will always line up with my beliefs and practices not the other way around no matter what you try to imply. The fact that I mentioned that if that were the case it would have an impact on what I planned to offer does not change any other fact in my OP. You will just have to deal with it.

[mkl3377]

Originally Posted by yukon

That pretty much sums it up, Paul!

Why in the world would someone build site content & give it away for free, that's nuts when they could just build their own backlink site, that won't get deleted. OP has no idea If those links will be around, the site could be flipped etc...

Op, no doubt is pushing something he has an interest in, which is directly related to what OP sells on this forum.

Then OP has the nerve to tell other members they shouldn't have a banner in his thread. Dude this isn't a WSO, & you didn't pay $$ for this thread.

Ok, excuse my ignorance here but I hardly see this being possible unless I've been around for awhile and have the resources to create and maintain my own sites. From what I've learned, to create content and link to my own sites I would need multiple hosting accounts, multiple domains, time to write for each site and build links to them. Last time I check that requires a lot of $$$$$$$$$$$$

I dont see how this is possible as a beginner.

Are you guys saying you dont do ANY article marketing?

What that guy is offering is a simple solution to those without the funds to find or pay for blog networks with high PR's. Even if I had to pay someone write an article and post it on a PR1-4 site then build links to it it would still be worth it for $4.

Now of course the links wont stick forever on the main page and benefit from the home page link juice but I've not seen any blog network offer that either. He's essentially offering what a blog network offers.....but FREE. I dont have to pay to have access to a blog network with a PR1-4.

How is this a bad thing?

[larkykid]

Hello,

How is it determined that a backlink from a guest post on a high PR blog would be more valuable than a comment backlink on a similar high PR blog. Is it due to the fact that the link on the post is an in content link. Also, there's likely to be less OBL as far as where the guest post is placed retaining more link juice, would that be another reason?

[IM Ash]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

...Theres no assurances ANYTHING will stick around.

....but umm just hypothetically what if there were assurances (not guarantees)? Like say a system where if someone yanked a link they were likely to lose a lot of their links too?

Mike Anthony,

You clearly pointing toward your upcoming service and there is a discernable motive other than what was mentioned in the OP. But regardless of your motives I think this thread and guest posting in particular has not received enough focus on the forum... this can still be an awesome thread if we stick to the subject of guest posting and the value it contributes to ones backlink profile.

We all know anyone can rank for a low-med. term with an emd and some elbow grease but when looking at more competitive terms their needs to be a diverse profile of quality links. Guest posting offers just that but please do not write-off high PR blog commenting as this --when done right-- can and does add tremendous value and juice.

When I mentioned my seo strategy on the forum to rank for competitive terms I pointed out that I use guest posts but that will never be enough to rank for competitive terms neither will the use of high PR blog comments on its own.

[Masterminding]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Funny stuff. I saw a guy here on WF recently willing to give PR links (not forum profile, not senuke blast, not blog comment but a real honest to goodness in context link) just for well written articles.

So far he doesn't seem to have much takers. Then a question hit me

Is this board really so into spamming that they don't know the benefit of having real authority links like this one? I mean had the guy dropped in and siad $5 for 200 blog comments he would have had a rush of PMs.

So let me ask straight out. IF a service could give you Authority links that would NOT roll off the authority page (lets say pageranked page) are you telling me you couldn't be bothered if you had to write an article or pay someone $5 or less to have one written?

I hate to burts your bubble there buddy, but PR doesn't automatically equal great rankings. One of many reasons why it doesn't: PR isn't updated frequently so the PR you see today may actually be the PR a site had 3 months ago. Sure, the PR of CNN doesn't change fast... but not every site is CNN

Next to that, the value a link passes on to your site also depends on relevancy. For example, if your page is about babysitters and a page about cars is linking to that page... then the site may be PR 8 but the link is just as valuable as a link from a page on a lower PR site that IS about babysitting.

And then there's the link text itself: exact match text links tend to outdo broad match text links...

Do you want me to keep going here?

The point is: yes, blog comments, directory listings, social media profiles, and all that spammy stuff DOES suck... but only focusing on how high a website's PR is when you're looking for links sucks just as much.

There are other factors involved.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Eleva8

Mike Anthony,

You clearly pointing toward your upcoming service and there is a discernable motive other than what was mentioned in the OP.

actually eleva its all there in the OP. I asked about services in general in the very last sentence of the OP .You can try to discern what you wish and swear in your mind you have it right. My question was not to point to my upcoming service for any sales purpose. It isn't even on the horizon. It was AS I STATED later related to some concern that something that had similarities to this would not be the place to even bother mentioning here at WF. So some marketing research based on there not being an interests here for that offer? Yes said so upfront with no attempt to hide anything as you imply. trying to point to a service that is not ready and which when ready this thread will be long dead? No. Please put away the mind reading gizmos.

I pointed to an entirely unrelated service to me. Why would I be pointing people to something else if my launch was around the corner? Would I be the first to get peoples idea about their interests in a thread so as to determine viability of other things? Nope. Programmers do it all the time and people actually put threads out for beta testers in THIS VERY Forum. NO I saw this guys offer and it intrigued me the lack of interest.

The wrinkle? I said there were SIMILARITIES but I can tell you now there would be huge differences too that I Know would not go over well here at all. so despite what anyone wished to think or swear they know for a fact this has been about basic concepts and not any service I am offering beyond me askign here and there some questions that yes do have some research factors.

and despite all the distortions my sig has nothing to do with any such service. Thats just made up garbage. Building a network is an ENTIRELY different matter. Meanwhile had I posted some study about blog comments and me ranking using them there would not have been half the outcry here if I even had a link to my blog offering Scrapebox. Why? because that follows the boards great love of link spam SEO so everyone would be fine with it.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Masterminding

I hate to burts your bubble there buddy, but PR doesn't automatically equal great rankings. One of many reasons why it doesn't: PR isn't updated frequently so the PR you see today may actually be the PR a site had 3 months ago.

Sorry to burst YOUR bubble Buddy but you are confused. Toolbar PR has absolutely nothing to do with why sites rank or do not rank and thats the only kind of PR that is not updated frequently. Tool PR is updated sporadically and does NOT reflect the internal algo PR but perhaps on the day it is updated. Real PR is updated constantly on Googles side. Toolbar PR that you see in your various tools is just for the public and not up todate. Toolbar PR has nothing to do with the algo and has very little to do with ranking at all. Internal PR (on Google's side ) is updated constantly despite your claims. Thats A

B) Thank you for the strawman argument. No one stated it was only PR. which is. why in context links are better than blog rolls - relevant and editorial in nature guest posts are better. Thts been stated before in this very thread. There are quite likely other authority factors but given that we know of only one value (because Google sporadically releases it) Pr is the only thing in regard to authority I mentioned. Has nothing to do with thinking that is all there is as you allege.

But thanks you for the lesson that every one knew and assumed everyone else did.

[IM Ash]

Mike, I'll refrain from making assumptions but you and I know that marketing is a process!

Bottomline... guest posting on authority blogs is powerful and every respectable SEO firm includes guest posting in their strategy and as such it should be used as one piece of the ranking puzzle.

[Masterminding]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Sorry to burst YOUR bubble Buddy but you are confused. Toolbar PR has absolutely nothing to do with why sites rank or do not rank and thats the only kind of PR that is not updated frequently. Tool PR is updated sporadically and does NOT reflect the internal algo PR but perhaps on the day it is updated. Real PR is updated constantly on Googles side. Toolbar PR that you see in your various tools is just for the public and not up todate. Toolbar PR has nothing to do with the algo and has very little to do with ranking at all. Internal PR (on Google's side ) is updated constantly despite your claims. Thats A

B) Thank you for the strawman argument. No one stated it was only PR. which is. why in context links are better than blog rolls - relevant and editorial in nature guest posts are better. Thts been stated before in this very thread. There are quite likely other authority factors but given that we know of only one value (because Google sporadically releases it) Pr is the only thing in regard to authority I mentioned. Has nothing to do with thinking that is all there is as you allege.

But thanks you for the lesson that every one knew and assumed everyone else did.

Lol. Dude, you don't have to tell me I was talking about the PR seen in tools and toolbars and that Google has the actual PR... but YOU don't. You don't work for Google so you can't say a site is PR this or that because you don't know the actual value and never will. Therefore, saying high PR pages rule is a flawed statement because you have no idea if they're really and/or still high PR.

Furthermore, your post topic and you yourself insinuated that a site with high PR equals a site you want a link of. But as I've stated before, determining which sites you want a link from is done with a whole range of factors: site theme, page theme, exact/broad match text link, linkprofile of the site, domain authority, domain age, etc.

I'm not saying you don't know that buddy, I'm saying that claiming it's good to have links from high PR sites could be misleading. You need to be more specific, because high PR sites can be spammers too. Just look at JC Penney being banned from Google, BMW, etc. lol!

[RevSEO]

You know what the problem is Mike? That most people think that quantity > quality of the backlinks.

Why would I want your awesome PR5 homepage backlink in relevant content when I could have 250,000 awesome Xrumer and Scrapebox spam links! ::sarcasm::

The other issue? Patience. We live in an instant gratification society, and what's with Google not giving my website instant rankings! </end sarcasm>

Seriously though, a lot of disinformation goes around as fact on a variety of forums and popular blogs and that's the biggest problem.

[JoshuaG]

I'm really only posting to say : "This thread, what a mess."

But I'll try to add something valuable to the discussion so my post sticks.

Give any backlink spam supporter the choice between 1000 High PR, in content, homepage backlinks on pages directly related to their niche OR 2000 generally spammy links and see how quickly they turn coats.

Its obvious to see where the value in link building is. Anyone stating otherwise is just living in denial.

[Mike Anthony]

Bottomline... guest posting on authority blogs is powerful and every respectable SEO firm includes guest posting in their strategy and as such it should be used as one piece of the ranking puzzle.

Agreed no one has yet to say that it should be the only thing and further no one ever said it couldn't be used in connection with every other thing done here. Theres only one side saying that it has no logical place and that is not my side.

You don't work for Google so you can't say a site is PR this or that because you don't know the actual value and never will. Therefore, saying high PR pages rule is a flawed statement because you have no idea if they're really and/or still high PR.

Thats funny. Though no one knows for sure its pretty amazing how many SEOS do quite well in the serps calculating and getting high Pr, relevant in context links. Besides there are ways of determining present PR that though not exact do give you some indication but if I took the time to teach you everything you don't know about SEO this thread would end up being about 20 pages long just on that enormous challenge by itself.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by RevSEO

You know what the problem is Mike? That most people think that quantity > quality of the backlinks.

Why would I want your awesome PR5 homepage backlink in relevant content when I could have 250,000 awesome Xrumer and Scrapebox spam links! ::sarcasm::

You nailed it. Its all about that. Even to the point of perfectly moronic statements like " just get links from your own backlink sites" like those sites have any value if they don't have links coming from other third party sites.

I am actually loving this thread though because I can see even new people reading through the nonsense and realizing what is being said makes absolutely no sense whatsoever even though it is being said by people who have been passing off knowing SEO for some time.

Your other point is on the money as well but it also relates to the IM mentality that says hey "you too can make a gazillion dollars by sitting on the couch and eating popcorn". Thats why you have silly commentary like a $5 article to get a good backlink is a waste because the site might disappear all the while pretending like just about any backlink anyone uses cant disappear. Chicken little silliness as an excuse to not providing any quality content to get links from the rest of the internet that at some point ( because its the INTER net ) everyone ends up relying on.

[MaverickUK]

Originally Posted by Masterminding

Next to that, the value a link passes on to your site also depends on relevancy. For example, if your page is about babysitters and a page about cars is linking to that page... then the site may be PR 8 but the link is just as valuable as a link from a page on a lower PR site that IS about babysitting.

Who told you that garbage? For all Google knows the babysitter website was linking to a car website because it offered a review about in car baby seats for example.

[Fraggler]

Originally Posted by paulgl

I say it a lot. Work on your own stuff, 100% of the time. That's
the only way to be assured of staying power for the long run.

Building up someone's site is not my cup of tea. I don't do EZA
either.

Networking with your peers is a great way to not only build backlinks but to get a traffic source outside of Google. I've got no problem at all creating content for another site if I get good value in return.

Referred targeted traffic can be worth more than just the backlink. Capture that traffic onto a mailing list or RSS feed and turn them into a return visitor.

If the sites in the offer being discussed are getting decent front page traffic then I think it is worth trying to swing some traffic your way. The link is a bonus.

The same with EZA: use it to network with people who like your content and pick and choose the people who will send you the bursts of traffic on top of the backlink.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Fraggler

Networking with your peers is a great way to not only build backlinks but to get a traffic source outside of Google. I've got no problem at all creating content for another site if I get good value in return.

Referred targeted traffic can be worth more than just the backlink. Capture that traffic onto a mailing list or RSS feed and turn them into a return visitor.
.

Syndication has all kinds of opportunities that those who have never tried it don't know about. Thing about it is one of the chief detractors of it (in this thread ) biggest claim to fame is admitting to spending considerable time contributing to a third party site - wikipedia - just so that he can fake being a legitimate editor to place links from them.

Yet here he is in this thread deriding the idea of people legitimately contributing to other sites rather than fraudulently. Its like a children's circus in here sometimes.

[Clyde]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

I will point out any service I see fit to talk about and there is not a thing you can do about it. It was not my own service and I linked to none of my sites or services. My services will always line up with my beliefs and practices not the other way around no matter what you try to imply. The fact that I mentioned that if that were the case it would have an impact on what I planned to offer does not change any other fact in my OP. You will just have to deal with it.

Sure, and I'll just drop in once awhile to remind people that you're nothing but a snake-oil salesman, self-proclaimed "SEO Scientist".

I got better things to do, it just sucks that the gullible will fall victim to your pitch without realizing it.

When are you launching your service that's so awesome and has no flaws o' SEO-lord?

Here's your logic:

High PR incontextual backlinks are awesome because I'm about to launch a service that provides exactly that.

Don't even get me started with you High PR homepage backlinks Terry Kyle wannabe's.

[Mike Anthony]

When are you launching your service that's so awesome and has no flaws o' SEO-lord?

Finally the recognition I deserve. . Although since it would involve quality over quantity it would not be for you I will make sure to let You , yukon and the rest of the gang know. No one has focused more in this thread on what I am doing or about to do more than you guys. You could be key in a fine publicity campaign. How many times now have you referred to my sig or service now? If only it were available. the check would be in the mail .

High PR incontextual backlinks are awesome because I'm about to launch a service that provides exactly that.

Don't even get me started with you High PR homepage backlinks Terry Kyle wannabe's.

bzzzz, Wrong. Guess again neither this thread or any service has anything to do with homepage backlinks. sheesh not even close. This thread is about syndication if you had cared to participate in it rather than troll and hijack it.

Terry's a good guy but even he wouldn't claim he invented SEO networks or homepage backlinks. Try a wider education in SEO. None of those started in WSOs or at any forum


...... and um easy on the wannabe accusations when openly trying to be a market samurai wannabe. Kind a looks hypocritical (again) especially since you admit that you owned and used their software and had the idea to allegedly improve on it. I never owned ANY of Terry's stuff or services and as far as I know (from websites and ads) he doesn't cover all that I do.

[nomaziz]

you are right but in many cases Free websites delete links.

[Clyde]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Finally the recognition I deserve. . Although since it would involve quality over quantity it would not be for you I will make sure to let You , yukon and the rest of the gang know. No one has focused more in this thread on what I am doing or about to do more than you guys. You could be key in a fine publicity campaign. How many times now have you referred to my sig or service now? If only it were available. the check would be in the mail .

I wasn't arguing against your point, I use BMR on a daily basis.

Just stating the obvious, you starting this thread to pre-sell your upcoming service.

If you want to promote something, pay for it.

You see that banner up there? Goes for $100/day.

and that high PR homepage backlinks comment wasn't meant for you btw, I know you don't do blogroll links.

[Mike Anthony]

I'm bored Clyde. I referred to another third party service entirely and will again if I feel like it. Theres nothing you can do about it. The fact that I subsequently mentioned that I was looking at that service wondering if it told me anything about one I was considering doing changes nothing. I am selling nothing of that nature here and may never. Fact none of you can change is that its directly about another offer and linked to another offer that is not mine. All some of you derailing guys have including unfortunately Eleva (but to be fair he is not a derailer) is your biased prejudicial mind reading suspicion. I posted the question and this thread because I thought it said something about what people valued and would value here and wanted to see if my suspicions were right. Don't give a rip about what you and Eleva et al want to think was in my head. When you get the world's first valid psychic license call me. Won't be buying the WSOs on that though

Here my man . proof positive - if you had any principle to stand on you would be arguing with this guy

What would you like in an SEO kw research software?

whose doing nothing but market research himself and nothing else (not even pointing to any other service) but you haven't. Thats not a presell right? LOL. You are in fact happily hypocritically participating in that thread with no complaints because OBVIOUSLY the issue you really have here is what the thread is about and how you think it indicts your spammy ways.

Sorry man but your duplicity in that thread makes you as transparent as a clean thin piece of glass to anyone with half a brain.

Join the long line . Its the same ole same ole. Any time anyone mentions anything about some white hat legitimate techniques the spammers get all excited and start making accusations. Its happened whether I have had a sig or not. Those be the facts.

[oldvintageguy]

Mike, I am unable to PM; is it possible you could PM me with a way I can contact you?

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by oldvintageguy

Mike, I am unable to PM; is it possible you could PM me with a way I can contact you?

Sent you a PM. Let me know if there are any problems getting it.