![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Domain Invester War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Hot Ass AZ
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 88
Thanked 100 Times in 99 Posts
|
Ok we all know a Anchor Link on a high PR homepage is worth golf. Ok, BUT what about a banner link on a high PR homepage? is it the same weight carried? It could be a 125x125 or a 468x60 if that banner is linked back to our homepage or inner page will that banner ad give us juice as well? |
| Want Monthly Backlinks Cheap? Got That New Affiliate Site That Needs Backlinks? Web 2.0, Wikis, Bookmarks + More? Link Building Packages <--- Here | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 457
Thanks: 29
Thanked 175 Times in 31 Posts
|
In my opinion, a contextual link is better for SEO purposes, whereas a banner link is more for direct traffic purposes. So, I'd go for the contextual link. With a banner, make sure you optimize it for SEO w/ proper alt/title tags. |
| | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Domain Invester War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Hot Ass AZ
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 88
Thanked 100 Times in 99 Posts
| Quote:
IE: you place my link with the anchor "Dog Walking" on you PR3 page. is that the same PR weight flowing back to me as if you place a 125x125 banner ad on your site that goes to my website? | |
| Want Monthly Backlinks Cheap? Got That New Affiliate Site That Needs Backlinks? Web 2.0, Wikis, Bookmarks + More? Link Building Packages <--- Here | ||
| | |
| | #4 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 46
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
with a banner link we can't specify the anchor text where as with a contextual link we can many people prefer the later |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Plundering the Web War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: , , .
Posts: 4,851
Thanks: 804
Thanked 1,200 Times in 887 Posts
| Quote:
on the first count. Contextual link, high up, in relative content will always be best, hence carry more weight. Whatever weight means. Not only PR, but authority is passed. But links are used for different purposes. You can't really compare the worth of a text link and an image link in "worth." If you compare PR and authority, the text link wins. Click through for traffic would be another metric, and only testing would tell as each individual page would be different. One image link may not have the same effect as another image on another page. But if you mean SEO weight, the text link wins. Which you already knew. Paul | |
| How to Make Money off Facebook: Login to your account. Deactivate your account. Get your butt to work.
| ||
| | |
| | #6 |
| Domain Invester War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Hot Ass AZ
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 88
Thanked 100 Times in 99 Posts
|
Ok yea SEo weight, I was thinking of ordering a few banners for one of my Amazon stores to post on like minded sites and wondered if it was worth it AND if Google would see that banner ad on say a PR3 page and send me the "juice" to my site as far as ranking goes like if it was a text link.
|
| Want Monthly Backlinks Cheap? Got That New Affiliate Site That Needs Backlinks? Web 2.0, Wikis, Bookmarks + More? Link Building Packages <--- Here | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| The Mathematical Warrior War Room Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,639
Thanks: 143
Thanked 283 Times in 185 Posts
|
Yea, I'd take the contextual link with some keyword anchor text.
|
| The Google Adwords Keyword Tool is hiding your valuable keywords! My personal review of Jack Duncan's Keyword Sniper Pro Adsense niche site success & boosted rankings - Clickbump Engine & Clickbump SEO | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| banner, contexual, link, linksame, weight |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |