Easy method that will convert a normal backlink into a Quality Backlink... !

[rafiseo]

Well experts always recommend quality backlinks. But its not easy to get quality backlinks without spending money and easily. However I have got a good method that can be alternative of paid quality backlinks! Here it is...

Quality backlinks have 4 features..

1- High PR
2- Niche Relevant
3- Low Out Bound Backlinks
4- Keyword in domain and title

Step-1
First of all we need to setup an account in wordpress, weebly, tumblr etc. type website. We need to use keyword in username(not always. For an example we can change title and domain url in wordpress anytime.).

Step-2
Then we need to write and post unique articles. Articles should be relevant to the keyword and should contain contextual backlink to our moneypage. 1 unique picture and 1 unique video can be added for making the page more attractive to google and also for audiences.

Step-3
Now the core backlink has 3 features that a quality backlink should have. Keyword in domain and title, relevant unique contents with a contextual backlink towards our moneypage and low OBL.

We need Just one thing more and that is PR. Well PR or Link Popularity is not a matter of overnight effort. PR means How many backlinks are casting votes for the page. As PR is all about number of backlinks so we can use some software to blast backlinks to our Core backlink.

- We can use AMR to blast some articles with spun contents relevant to our niche.
- We can use senuke-x to blast some web 2.0, social networking, social bookmarking, bog etc. backlinks.
- Xrumer for normal profile backlinks. etc. etc. etc.

Finally use Scrapebox to create some backlinks from at least PR 1 blogs. It can be manual or can be a blast.

Now the page has lots of backlinks. So its equivalent to a PR webpage. Link juice of the backlink will depend on how many backlinks you have created and indexed by google.

To avoid risk of sandbox you can limit creating backlinks to the Core backlink. I will suggest you to create some wordpress, tumblr, posterous, weebly, indenti.ca, viddlr etc. type backlinks to the core backlinks and then blast backlinks to each of this backlinks too. It will minimize the risk of sandboxing.

Hope the post will help newbies and some folks who are just behind of me. lol

[retsek]

Good advice for the newbs.

I'll also add that you need to vary the anchor text/keyword used on all the links you create. I only use the target keyword 50-60% of the time. The rest is variations or similar words. You still the get the credit and juice for them.

Also use generic words like Read more, or Click here, etc. Naked URLs (ie. urls without anchor text) are also good to throw in a few times.

[Stalliontheme]

Actually a quality backlink also includes a trusted source aspect. Basically a domain that's been around a while (ideally years) and it's backlinks are aged resulting in a reasonable PR home page.

It's a lot of work to create sites like those and the above isn't a way to achieve it. WordPress.com sites are sub-domains for example, and sub-domains have no more value than buying a brand new domain, Google treats a sub-domain like a new domain (gains no 'trust' value from the main site).

Don't get me wrong, the links will help, but they'll help around 15% less well (PR wise) than had you linked directly to the domain you want ranking well because of the dampening factor that reduces link benefit that passes through a link. Every page PR passes through uses 15% (when the PageRank formula was created by the Google founders the dampening factor was 15%, could be more/less today) of the link benefit.

David

[rafiseo]

@restek Yes we can use different anchor texts. It will give the link building campaign a natural look

@Stalliontheme. Yes you are quite right. Link age, domain age, links from authority webpages etc. are important and quality backlinks usually has these type of backlinks. This is just a method that gives a PR N/A backlink some weight. And within a year this raw link can be a good PR backlink for your money page.

I am not sure about the sub domain theory. I need to study more about it. But subpages like backlinks from wikipedia pages can work really good.

If first look it looks like lots of work. But if anyone develop a pattern then it become easy. As I am using the method and getting some good results so I think it will be helpful for others too.

[TEK]

I would like to add just one thing about authorities of domain and subdomain. A lot of beginners think if they got link from PR8 or PR9 site, like Youtube or Wordpress, all work is done. Without links AND traffic links are worthless.

There are two important rules:
1. Every page, not only site has its own authority. This means SITE/PAGE has different (in most cases much much lower) authority than SITE.
2. If you can choose between format SITE/YOURPAGE (taking authority directly out of main site) and YOURPAGE.SITE (opening your personal domain on blogging platform), the first format is always better. You can check this on Squidoo and Hubpages, where Squidoo lenses in most cases easily overpower hubs.

I had more than dozen lenses on Squidoo, all ranking 1 or 2 and all without a single link, taking PR only out of my profile (PR3), where authority was earned with activity in community.

[yukon]

PR means How many backlinks are casting votes for the page. As PR is all about number of backlinks so we can use some software to blast backlinks to our Core backlink.

Totally wrong...

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by rafiseo

Now the page has lots of backlinks. So its equivalent to a PR webpage. l

That is false. More links does not mean PR necessarily. The truth is although I hate spamming the only one of those links that is really going to give you PR are the blog comments because some of those pages actually have PR.

Furthermore if you are going to use SenukeX and have the cash for that you would be better buying some aged domains with PR or even a good home page backlink service. links on pages with PR is what gives your sites lasting PR. Thats just how PR works

With AMR you have the article marketing thing covered and a whole ton load of profiles is just not going to do it. Yes I have raised PR with some profiles but mass forum profiles tend to evaporate after awhile as they are blasted by everyone and deleted or made nofollowed by webmasters.

[yukon]

Originally Posted by Daniel Wilson

Partially wrong...

Big chunk of PR is due to backlinks but there are at least 200 more things, which affect PR.

What I quoted above is 100% wrong, I'll quote it again.

PR means How many backlinks are casting votes for the page. As PR is all about number of backlinks so we can use some software to blast backlinks to our Core backlink.

PR has nothing to do with the volume of links (nothing).

Do you really believe 10 PR7 links will be trumped by 1,000 PRn/a links?

Start with junk, you'll end up with junk...

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by yukon

Do you really believe 10 PR7 links will be trumped by 1,000 PRn/a links?

Start with junk, you'll end up with junk...

Umm you do realize that there are a whole lot of people on this board that are more impressed by 40,000 backlinks from Xrummer, senukex etc that are all N/As than if you told them you would give them 10 links all PR6 and up.

So though you are right don't be too sure that everyone sees how ridiculous that scenario is.

[iAmNameLess]

Originally Posted by Daniel Wilson

Partially wrong...

Big chunk of PR is due to backlinks but there are at least 200 more things, which affect PR.

You mean 200 more things that effect the SERPs, not PR... PR really isn't THAT complex. I agree with Yukon on saying totally wrong.

[markw89]

what are the best ways suggested to make backlinks to our core backlink? naturally i mean, except using scrapebox to find high pr dofollow blogs to make manual comment on.

[Oranges]

"2 Tier Links" Sums it up nicely.

[cagliostro]

This method has been talked here in many threads. "tiered backlinks" or "buffer sites" ...