![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
|
Over the last couple of weeks (since October 14th- allegedly Panda 2.5.2) i am sensing that Google is now giving backlinks the advantage over quality content, almost just like before the first Panda update in February. Does anyone else feel this way and sense this change? |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 32
Thanks: 13
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #3 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 219
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
|
I have noticed that few quality sites i regularly visit, have fallen in rankings and more spammy sites have moved up ahead. Additionally, my website which is 100% original and very high-quality also suffered from somewhat of a drop. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Really? Maybe that's only a temporary thing. After all Google always put quality over backlinks.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I have a similar feeling as you do. But I have not done enough tests to make this with certainty claimed.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Eleanor Ruse War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 302
Thanks: 49
Thanked 103 Times in 69 Posts
|
Google will always be looking for quality sites but they are, and have been for a long time, moving towards high quality content combined with high quality backlinks. Google might be leaning towards giving an advantage to sites with high quality backlinks as well as high quality content. If this is the case (which it probably is) then sites that have average content might get a temporary boost if their backlinks are of high quality. Just my thoughts. Thanks Eleanor |
| | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 104
Thanked 138 Times in 122 Posts
|
I've given up trying to figure out what Google wants. It's about what I want now |
| Cloud phone system - Built specifically for SoHo and IMs. Try it free for 30 days - Click here | ADD URL | IM Ninja | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 231
Thanks: 5
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #9 |
| RevSEO.com High PR Links Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: NYC
Posts: 853
Thanks: 26
Thanked 111 Times in 93 Posts
|
Google's actually after a few things with the recent Panda update. Here's what they are after: Quality content - Google's admitted publicaly that they have a problem. HackerNews, a popular tech "forum", often has dialogue with Matt Cutts about how littered the search results are. Heck, they've even gone as far as creating a form that helped combat duplicate content for a while. Crap spun content is on its way out as the bots and algorithms get smarter and smarter. Panda was created in an effort to do just that, combat low quality content. Quality backlinks - Let's face it, with each new linkbuilding service often comes a new spam service. I hate it more than the next guy. But, there are more and more these types of services being released to the public daily. Profile links, blog comments, and other abused links once were a good indicator of backlinks. Now, not so much. Taking it to the next level Google's doing all they can to de-index and remove the crap from the SERPs. Part of that are forum profiles from overly abused domains with huge databases of spammers. Why should Google index a forum profile that's just like the next 50,000 on the same domain? They shouldn't. Google's has two real goals as a search engine, provide kick-butt results for the searchers, and make sure they refine the way they make money. The trick is finding how to balance great content, high PageRank backlinks, and the value that the searcher is looking for. No need to reinvent the wheel. |
| | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 293
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Why can't you have both? That way you can't go wrong? High quality content and lots of high quality backlinks?
|
| | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: , , .
Posts: 2,360
Thanks: 24
Thanked 668 Times in 363 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| Click here, and the bunny gets it.
| ||
| | |
| | #12 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 55
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
My impression is that they are doing alot more human reviewing now, and also trying to match search results better to "searcher intent". eg walmart.com is probably a good match for someone searching for "walmart" cheap-blue-widgets.com may not be a good match for someone searching for "cheap blue widgets". |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| backlinks, latest, panda, quality |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |