![]() | | ||||||||
| | #51 | |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 16
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #52 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 490
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
|
I don't think anyone will be sure 100% what really happened even if we assumed there has been a penalty imposed. One of the options is to fix the problem and send a reconsideration request to Google. Since we don't know exactly what caused it, you have to read the Google Guidelines and see that you are in full compliance with everything or fix those you're not.
|
| Learn Affiliate Marketing and Find out How I Make Money Using Simple Methods That You Can Use From Anywhere In The World.
| |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: USA
Posts: 68
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Again, having built thousands of links for a long year since my original post the "link velocity" idea is the only theory in this thread that MIGHT have any validity. Everything else is superstition. I have definitely noticed that if I stop building links my SERPs tend to drop. This may have something to do with the "link velocity" concept described above, but I think it's more likely that some links are just disappearing. For instance with article marketing, most article marketing sites will have a "Recent Articles" page with higher PR than your actual article. For the first few days your article will be listed on this page and I think that may increase the authority of both the article and everything it links to. When your article falls off of that page, its overall authority decreases. Either way a whitehat's strategy should be the same: regularly build as many links as possible. And don't do anything to ruin the quality of Google's index unless you want to get penalized in a manual review (very rare in the SERPs, but they do happen). That's it. |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 74
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 6 Posts
|
It doesn't matter how fast or how slow you build backlinks, there are no penalties unless you're obviously linkfarming and google catches you. The reason that sandboxing is a myth is because if it were true, you could get 10 of your marketing friends to gang up on the 1st position site and throw 10k+ PR0 scuttle and pligg backlinks with bookmarking demon. If this worked, everyone would be doing it. But it doesn't work which is why no one does it. Obviously, if you stop building links, your rankings will fall as your competitors build links. |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Redneck Warrior War Room Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Pacific North West, WA, USA
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 52
Thanked 68 Times in 61 Posts
| Quote:
I should add I may notice on one day google only picks up a few links and another it picks up 50. | |
| Last edited by reapr; 10-05-2009 at 10:17 AM. Reason: more info | ||
| | |
| | #56 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
IN my experience google usually impose a "ranking penalty". This is a drop of around 30 placed in the SERPS. Google will cancel this penalty depending on many factors but a important one is how much you spend on PPC. Go-Compare in the UK were banned for about 1 week but soon let back in. |
|
Love the link wheel | |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
thanks for creating this thread. its a nice informative thread |
| | |
| | |
| | #58 | |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
I agree with Michaelsweb and a bit of what others have expressed in this thread. It doesn't matter how many links you get as long as they aren't on FFA, link farms, black listed sites... etc. As long as you use a little common sense in linkbuilding such as changing the anchor text around and often, rather than having the same keyword over and over, do your linking on reputable sites, then you can pretty much add as many backlinks as you can stand to. One caveat here, I'd probably take into consideration how long the site has been online, how many backlinks it currently has and then throttle up to full speed accordingly, rather than going from 0-60 in 2 seconds. IMHO | |
| | |
| | #59 | |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
Build some more links, but throw in some variations - target a related anchor text, add some click heres, have a few links with just the url. | |
|
My article ranks review >> Article ranks review part 2 | ||
| | |
| | #60 | |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Indiana
Posts: 257
Thanks: 20
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| backlinks, building, fast |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |