Getting Backlinks Indexed / Crawled (Linklicious vs. Lindexed)

[kkchoon]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Is that why you had multiple threads closed where you attempted to do a "Case study" based on your own software and system? come on KK. A little honesty. its cool. It is a marketing forum after all. Marketers who don't want to pitch don't pitch their services.

As for the challenge . Yes proceed. IF you get take and hold top three using just weak links then I will eat my hat and pay you to rank your own site.

I am not too concerned about proving who knows SEO though . I think given recent posts by you that no regular SEO member here agrees with thats already been exposed.

Not sure why you make it a big deal. Forum marketing is all about trust - where you can provide proof and information that really helps the community, in return you'll build your reputation, and may in the process make some friends... I really don't mind people pitching their own service as long as they do helps.

Good luck to your business!

[dminorfmajor]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

lol I am embarassed for you. Search count is not competition count. You still trying that sales tactic to sell your stuff KK?

how about we go for this one

https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&t...w=1280&bih=516

because obviously 37 million pages are trying to compete for "backlink pants" - ROFL

This thread had already accomplished it LOL. It's ranked #2 for "Backlink Pants". GG, Mike wins :P

[BigNorm]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Sooner or later people will begin to figure out that the need for these services is only because of the kind of junk backlinking sellers try to push. IF your links are having a problem being crawled its because Google can't be bothered digging deep where those links are put.

They are low quality
without good navigation
a lot of the time viewed as spammy
and often get deleted

indexers and index services are a waste of money trying to force Google to see links it cares little about. instead skip those kinds of links to begin with. Then we don't have to see the two sellers in this thread going back and forth trying to sell their services for garbage links because that kind of service will be retired to prehistoric (okay maybe more prepanda) practices.

Haha....I always look forward to your comments. I commend you on your abrupt honesty and being straight up.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by dminorfmajor

This thread had already accomplished it LOL. It's ranked #2 for "Backlink Pants". GG, Mike wins :P

Trust me if I know Kk he will come back with some nonsense about it not being in quotes but what it PROVES regardless is that all search count is is how many times a phrase shows up in the database NOT any indication of who else is competing to try and rank for a term.

Its a totally made up metric by sellers to fool people with rankings that look impressive but are as easy as pie. They make up this false metric and then post screen shots etc to get people excited who know no better.

[kkchoon]

Talk all you want mike, you are the one who contradict your own believes.

Every can talk, but not everyone can "rank".

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by kkchoon

Every can talk, but not everyone can "rank".

And some in this thread do nothing but talk of ranking even claiming they can rank for "backlinks" but then run away when its chosen.

[dminorfmajor]

KK, please go rank a brand new blog (you don't even have to buy a domain) for "backlinks". I know you can do it buddy!

Actually, I don't but I think it would be fun seeing if you could break in the top 50.

[HKSEO Extropy]

Originally Posted by dminorfmajor

KK, please go rank a brand new blog (you don't even have to buy a domain) for "backlinks". I know you can do it buddy!

Actually, I don't but I think it would be fun seeing if you could break in the top 50.

Man, why do you guys stalk him across threads? That's nutty. I'd love to see your test, though.

We've ranked a vanity SEO keyword just today with 40 high PR articles published two days ago. And in the past we've ranked a site with zero "indexed" backlinks for 6 or 8 terms.

Both high quality and unindexed quality methods will work. Unfortunately for us SEOs, it's a very inexact science and there is a lot of room for hand waving. We find the best results when blending the cheap stuff (for IP diversity) with the good stuff (for power).

[iyerkedar]

I have seen SERP improvements for my websites with Linklicious.

This tool is very useful especially for those cheap and crappy forum profile links and blog comments. Most of these cheap links are not even crawled by Google. Linklicious will make sure they are crawled by Google. This is enough for SERP improvement.

I have a fiverr gig on linklicious. Please search for my username on fiverr (i.e) iyerkedar.

[bydomino]

Originally Posted by kkchoon

Why bother to leave a short message that no one can understand?

This was a response to your original 85 Million competition comment where yukon put a simple and elegant response, which was:
------------------------------
Originally Posted by yukon
Ultimate SEO fail.

I won't even bother explaining way.
------------------------------
This response is incredibly clear and anybody with a the smallest SEO clue will know this. I for one LMAO when I read it, having understood it immediately.

I'm sure you have a good product. I for one, do believe in indexing your backlinks. Having said that I am a Linklicious customer.

Okay now for the explanation: It seems that everybody is laughing about this except for you. For you do do a search on Google and use the number of results as a measure of the actual competition for that keyword is just flat out "rookie". To do this in front of non-SEO people "might" go over. But here it leads people to question your knowledge of SEO. From all that I can see, you're not getting this.

I want to believe that you know your SEO, I'm pretty sure you do. Perhaps it is a language barrier or something else. It would do you a great service to come clean on this and explain something to cover this blunder. Or, as yukon put it: Ultimate SEO fail

I wish you the very best,

Kevin
Airborne!

[harvez16]

Haha this would have to be the funniest thread I've come across in the warrior forum.

It's funny that someone can consistently try and back their claims up with absolutley no proof and continue to do so over and over again...

Just accept the challenge and put your money where your mouth is!!

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by iyerkedar

This tool is very useful especially for those cheap and crappy forum profile links and blog comments. Most of these cheap links are not even crawled by Google. Linklicious will make sure they are crawled by Google. This is enough for SERP improvement.

So why not just get better links?????

If you have to force google with a service to look at some links how long are they going to stay in the index anyway? People may point to the short term gains (if you call them that because the links are still crappy even when Google finds them), but once you stop backing up your drop dead weak links they are going to go off Google's radar in no time.

[4morereferrals]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

. Come on KK. Who are you kidding here? Of course I know that you sell profile links. I'm not going to give you a link to your sales page but heres a quote from it -

"Every month, we will create 4,000 high quality profile links on 2,000 High PR websites, each with 2 backlinks to your designated page."

So again lets stop with the games.




I take it thats your way of stating you won't go for the very term you brought up. Hardly surprising. No I have accepted the backlink term that you brought up. Its now you running from it. My proof that you claim I do not have is right there in that serp.

https://www.google.com/search?source....0.1l9l0&gl=US

Not a single page in the top four rank for that term without employing HIGH PR links NOT profile links. Anyone can fire up even the free version of SEO spyglass and see that. in Position 8 is a xrummer service that has been trying FOR MONTHS to crack the top 4 and HAS FAILED. They occasionally get to first page and get tossed back to page two after awhile.

Get that? The proof is looking at you right there in the serps and not just any serp THE NUMBER ONE search term for Backlink sellers - backlinks .

So lets see you rank. Stop stalling. Prove yourself in your own niches keyword that YOU said in this very thread you could do. Either that or run away as usual.

All from the guy telling us all how the only viable links are HIGH PR links ...

With the service for making or building you a HIGH PR Network in the sig

C'mon Mike.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by 4morereferrals

All from the guy telling us all how the only viable links are HIGH PR links ...

With the service for making or building you a HIGH PR Network in the sig

C'mon Mike.

Rofl. and you objection has nothing to do with you selling indexing in your sig Steve? ummm ok

Incidentally older thread. the offer in my sig is just added today but do I believe in getting high quality links over crappy links.

GUILTY AS CHARGED.

Apply the logic to any other purchase. Who buys weak pipes that they have to reinforce? Who buys a new car with a bad engine that they have to constantly fix? Buy dinner that stilll leaves you hungry an hour later?

backing up your backlinks is cool to a degree but logically its a direct admission that they are links that Google would rather and will eventually ignore.

and no there are better links besides network links so sig or no sig links that are not crawled are obviously weak.

C'mon Steve. who are we fooling?

[cashp0wer]

I have not being interested in getting my backlinks crawled until recently when my mentor told me she uses linklicious. She said over time her rankings have gone up more so than before using linklicious. So soon i might decide to use a service that helps your links get noticed when i have got my head around a backlinking strategy and this thread has being a blast to read by the way.

[sydneypm]

4MoreReferrals - I have been trying to find out more info about Backlink Energizer and tried replying on 2 other threads about your service (no answers, yet). Can you tell me where I can find the latest and if you have any comparisons with others? I just signed up for Backlinks Indexer but am interested if yours works just as well as far as percentage of links getting indexed. I like the idea of no monthly fees. Thank you. (PM me if it is better for you.)

Cindy P.

p.s. sorry to hijack this thread but I'm not getting answers in other threads that are supposed to be on this subject....

[jharr53301]

So what was recommended to use for the original posted question LOL?

[fbernar]

This thread - LOL!

[JeffNormand]

Holy crap you guys! I leave for a few weeks and look at the mess!

Honestly... there are different ways to link build, let's at least agree on that. KK's method does yield results, but I am sure a manual, more organic method (slower, more work) may work as well if not better, but time is always an issue. RSS / Pinging DOES help, this cannot be discredited.

To each his own

[Cecil Dee]

Originally Posted by JeffNormand

Holy crap you guys! I leave for a few weeks and look at the mess!

Honestly... there are different ways to link build, let's at least agree on that. KK's method does yield results, but I am sure a manual, more organic method (slower, more work) may work as well if not better, but time is always an issue. RSS / Pinging DOES help, this cannot be discredited.

To each his own

Agreed. So use both

[cssitkt]

Given recent Google changes I think I agree with Mike here. If you have to force Google to find your links then I think that indicates those links are not great. A good quality link will be indexed quickly without any effort.

My current thinking is to emphasis link profiles that mimic natural link profiles and using services to get 1000's of links crawled / indexed quickly isn't very natural.

I've had three big money making sites tanked in the last two weeks with penalty notices straight from Google Search Quality Team; all three of them used Lindexed and Nuclear Link Indexer. I'm not blaming these services as many other things were in the mix but they were being used at the time.

For what its worth if your are intent in having your links crawled I found Lindexed much better than Linkicious and I found NLI better than anything else for indexing and I used / tested just about everything.