Backlinktopia - Does it work?

[discustipated]

Anyone used this program? If so, did you really shoot past all the comp. in 1 hour? If so, wouldnt everyone be using this. I dont understand??? If I spend my money on it and dont ahoot pass the comp. In one hour, can I sue for false advertising? I really want to rank my sites. Anyone???

[ddDonPaul]

Originally Posted by discustipated

Anyone used this program? If so, did you really shoot past all the comp. in 1 hour? If so, wouldnt everyone be using this. I dont understand??? If I spend my money on it and dont ahoot pass the comp. In one hour, can I sue for false advertising? I really want to rank my sites. Anyone???

maybe it will work, but surely it will not boost your rankings in 1 hour, if that`s what you mean...

[FokusNow]

The best way to find out is to go to the advance search on this forum and search for backlinktopia in the Internet Marketing Product Reviews & Ratings section. Three results come up and there are pages of warrior's insights on the product.

[Matt Baker]

I haven't heard about this.. And I only trust BMR.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Sellers like that choose some weak search term where anyone can rank because no one wants the term and then use that to fool newbies into thinking they will get the same results on real search words.

Read the ad print completely and you will find its all smokes and mirrors. They really are not promising that just making it look like it in the headlines.

Hay, Creator of the offer Here to clarify
(Only to clarify)

What Mike is saying about search terms dose not apply to this offer. In the example we used a strong action keyword for a CPA campaign. One of are biggest competitors was yahoo.

Mike is not a user of the software so I'd like to show you what real trusted warriors and users have to say.

Originally Posted by madison75074

This is a simple technique that really works. I purchased this a few months ago and have seen quite a few of my sites jump up in rankings by several pages. I've also had some sites I had practically given up on that are making steady adsense money now. This is a tool that I actually have continued to use everyday. You could also outsource this fairly easily if you want to scale it up a bit.

"Hit page 1 of Google"

Within his success story he reveals his tactics he personally uses so I have not copy all of is story. Thanks for understanding.

2 weeks ...5 pages on Google

There are meany warriors like yourself getting grate results.

Originally Posted by ross007

Hey Clint,

I have to say that your ''Backlinking Software'' rocks! I've followed your instructions and definitely seen an increase in the amount of traffic and sales on my other valuable sites. These sites will just get better meaning more sales for me .....

I've wasted so much time with other WSO's when all I really needed was this software and thanks for getting back to my queries promptly. That means a lot to me.

Please don't forget to send me any other software related WSO's.

Ross

Originally Posted by johncarlton

Brilliant WSO!!!!!!! 6

Originally Posted by Anthony Boult

By the way this product really looks amazing,..
Thanks
Anthony

Originally Posted by walpants

ok i just bought watched all the videos and its very easy to work, got everything set up and just ran my first project.

Originally Posted by madison75074

I've been using the software for a few days and have converted over 400 articles to pdf with a link to my site. The software does work if you use it properly and wow what a time saver! Now I just need more PLR.

Originally Posted by PHDLover

hi it's me from Page 2..
with this tool I still can drive traffic to one of my blog which already deindex by Google up to 500uv/day.. I posted the screenshot on my social profile and people asking me what's the secret.. but sorry, I did not told them I use your tool.. hahaha..

Originally Posted by Envy9er

This is an awesome backlink tool that a lot of people overlook! Im just kicking myself for not getting in before the increase...you snooze, you lose!!

Originally Posted by Ecoste

Hello, Clint Faber. I bought the software, I have to say that the explanation is awesome, so is the software!

"improving are rankings already"

Originally Posted by Melody

Hi Clint -

First of all - anything that Brad recommends, has to be a winner, so I am already on board -

Melody

Originally Posted by Brad Gosse

Clint people may be confused cause you are charging too little.

I have a full time VA right now dedicated to this task.

Take PLR articles
Link keywords to sites
upload to document share sites

I can take her off and get her on something else now.

AMAZING value .

Originally Posted by SerKur

My site on friday 7th on page 23.

Today 1st page position 4 .

All because of this software. I do not think that more words are requiered.

THIS WORKS

Hope this helps.

[StevenUK]

That's one of the problems with the WarriorForum though, Clint, the ole 'review-buddy-buddy-system'.

Also, the WarriorForum should not let owners of WSO's saturate REAL threads with made-up, and paid-for reviews.

Please leave customers to make their own minds up. Or they may go to other forums to discuss your product.

[emasters]

Commission Autopilot is better than Backlinktopia.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by StevenUK

That's one of the problems with the WarriorForum though, Clint, the ole 'review-buddy-buddy-system'.

Also, the WarriorForum should not let owners of WSO's saturate REAL threads with made-up, and paid-for reviews.

Please leave customers to make their own minds up. Or they may go to other forums to discuss your product.

Steven, You will be happy to know that the WF and I are also against:
review copes
payed for reviews
and asking for reviews
Luckily there are Forum rules against it.

I think it is a good thing that vendors treat there customers like "buddy"/friends.

[StevenUK]

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

Steven, You will be happy to know that the WF and I are also against:
review copes
payed for reviews
and asking for reviews
Luckily there are Forum rules against it.

I think it is a good thing that vendors treat there customers like "buddy"/friends.

You may be against paid reviews, Clint. But it happens on most WSO's. You know it, and I know it.

Reviews are good for business, which is the reason you saturate your own WSO's with a posting full of positive reviews after every 20 posts, or so, or whenever you see a negative, like you have on this page, so you tried to 'drown' it out with a fist full of reviews.

Poor tactics. What you should have done, is explained about the negative, and turned the situation around.

This is your reputation, man. Why would you not try and diffuse negatives?!

[lisadan1]

I also not heard about this and are not used this.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by StevenUK

...

Yes you bring up a very valid point I have seen it before and I do believe mods are doing there best here to enforce the rules.

As you can see we do try to diffuse negativity and bring forth the positiveness.

Product owner can talk until their blue in the face about how great and perfect their product is and this tends to get you nowhere. Based on my experience. That is why I try to have my users speak for me.

Feel free to contact me via PM if you would like to go over tactics as I'm More then happy to help.

[Mike Anthony]

I've seen ton loads of WSos where the reviews were not officially bought but a matter of JV relationships past , future or hoped for. Theres no way that mods can possible track that. How do I know? Because some of them leaving reviews have told me thats why they left a review. The worst case I ever saw was a product that did very well but there was something pretty unusual about the reviews on page one and two. They had an unusually high amount of people giving great reviews that the PDF just magically had links promoting. Go figure - what a coincidence

At the end of the day what is offered trumps what any reviewers says. Is it credible? does it make sense, is the copy telling you the truth? Unfortunately lots of people out there are gullible and lets face it sellers don't and shouldn't be required to post their negative reviews so its always slanted when a seller does that. A good thing to do is actually decipher what some reviewers say as sellers like to give a wall of reviews but "looks awesome" "anything that Brad recommends" are not testimonials to whether the product works. In fact is shows another phenomenon - People often leave testimonials even before they have tried the product extensively. To be Fair to Clint I decided to look through the thread the testimonials were taken from (fair game since he posted them here) and frankly its pretty thin on anyone claiming to rank. there are maybe two or three people who said they saw increases and in nowhere near what Backlinktopia represents in its copy.

To the Ops question then - No backlinktopia does not work as advertised. Thats all I need to know. Anyone hyping their product will take your sites and "Effortlessly Zooms It To Page#1 Rankings In UNDER 1 Hour" isn't being completely honest and upfront furthermore there are rules about making such claims nowadays - has to be representative not a fluke here or there.

Clint is right though that I don't use it (nor any product that implies any link or link software on the planet can rank you effortlessly in an hour) but if he wants me too I will buy it and give a fair review but it will mention whether or not that claim was true.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

.....

Thanks for your feedback Mike,
I must first reinforce my statement, I do truly believe that the moderators are doing the best they can to enforce the rules and yes you are correct in any society there are certain "clicks" are group of friends that collaborate together outside of the whole community as a whole. Although I have not personally been involved with any sort of JV promotion with my friends here in the forum those sort of things do happen yes.

The claim that you're quoting directly reflects my results and is meant to grab your attention, which is all explained in the sales letter. Yes, there are many people posting their comments of their first impressions as well is there results after using diffrent WSOs and we do not see anything wrong with this at all.

I agree that it truly is impossible for everyone to get the same exact results but hopefully anyone running a WSO mimics what we strive for and that is to help everyone get the best value possible . To address your statement of "does not work as advertised" our experience, as well as other warriors here on the forum disagree, we respect that you have a right to have your own opinion whether you are a outside skepticist or user.

[freemen14]

Just to get the original thread back on track. I've been looking at Backlinktopia for a week now and am considering it as part of my backlinking efforts. Does it worK? Would love to know. I think the concept of automated PDF link building has some merit.

As per the highjacking of the thread. Of course the review system has it's flaws on the WF as it relates to WSO's. Everything must be read, reviewed and thought through with a fairly objective filter if possible.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by freemen14

As per the highjacking of the thread. Of course the review system has it's flaws on the WF as it relates to WSO's. Everything must be read, reviewed and thought through with a fairly objective filter if possible.

There has been no "hijacking of this thread" its not a WSO thread ( People also need to read the OP as well because its not even a general I am considering Backlinktopia question the OP asks. He specifically asks about the one hour claim). If someone puts up reviews to indicate proof that it works (Which is the thread title) then its fair game to evaluate the weight of those reviews. Reviews are part of the discussion only because the seller introduced it in this thread and I might add did so without touching the actual question of ranking within an hour that the OP raised.

To address your statement of "does not work as advertised" our experience, as well as other warriors here on the forum disagree, we respect that you have a right to have your own opinion whether you are a outside skepticist or user.

Clint did you even read the OP??? I addressed what the Op came away with after reading your copy. It IS the subject of his OP. He directly asks about that one hour claim. Frankly I don't think the question is unreasonable or even unexpected the way you worded it in your bold and large print- like the software is designed to effortlessly rank you in one hour and then immediately saying "you" to the buyer like it is reproducible as a matter of course for the software.. Effortlessly and fluke are contradictions. If software does something effortlessly it is not a fluke. Its misleading to say the least and thats why the Op asked what he asked.

Swing high or swing low if you read the OP's question - the answer is NO Backlinktopia does not meet what the Op says in the OP. Now if you want to claim that the OP came to a wrong conclusion well anyone can read the claims and come to their own conclusion as to whether the the Op pulled it out of thin air. He's not alone as that conclusion drawn has lead to several questions just like it - as you should be aware of - so clearly it is misleading people.

[freemen14]

Mike. Don't write yourself into a corner here. The person who wrote the post asked if it worked as per stated in the sales copy. You wrote that it was "garbage" and warned about sales copy smoke and mirrors, FIRST. Then WSO owner took part in the thread with his reviews.

why would somone of your good seo reputation get involved in such crap rhetoric? If the system/program/software is not worth it let us know why.

(To be fair to Mike. Previous thread gives answer to some of my post)

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Clint did you even read the OP??? ..

Yes I have read the OP and I have made no statement objecting to the validity and relevance of the OP's question here and I truly do believe that the question was addressed. In the post that you quoted from me I was merely directly responding to your post.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by freemen14

why would somone of your good seo reputation get involved in such crap rhetoric? If the system/program/software is not worth it let us know why.

because its not crap rhetoric and part of my reputation is speaking it like it is not like the Hype would like me to massage it. I responded unlike you are doing to the actual OP. Want to read it again?

Anyone used this program? If so, did you really shoot past all the comp. in 1 hour? If so, wouldnt everyone be using this. I dont understand??? If I spend my money on it and dont ahoot pass the comp. In one hour, can I sue for false advertising? I really want to rank my sites. Anyone???

So no matter what you think of the OP's question it is about a piece of software that will rank him within an hour and thats not just garbage - thats hot garbage. Stand by it. No one said a thing about reviews until the seller brought it up so I have no idea what point you think you are making on that. Anyway

THERE IS NO SOFTWARE THAT PEOPLE CAN USE THAT is "an amazing new “Google proof” system to zoom yourself to page 1 rankings" within an hour.

I fail to see where I am painting myself into any corner or saying anything that anyone that knows a lick oF SEO would disagree with but hey if thats crap rhetoric to you then I can call crap SEO knowledge like I see it and I'd be seeing it.

[cmarie]

Originally Posted by Matt Baker

I haven't heard about this.. And I only trust BMR.

What is BMR?

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

Yes I have read the OP and I have made no statement objecting to the validity and relevance of the OP's question here and I truly do believe that the question was addressed.

Sorry Clint I missed it. could you point out to me where in this thread you told the Op that he should not expect to rank within an hour? Too make sure I was being fair to you I went through the thread again and the only thing I saw was that you claim to use copy to get attention. You still haven't told the Op that he should not expect to rank within an hour and thats precisely what he asked.

I have nothing against your program perse or even in attention getting headlines but I do think they should not be misleading. My sig says Destroy google - its an attention getter but no one could walk away thinking I was selling something to blow up Google's headquarters but when you represent that a piece of software can rank you in an hour and SEVERAL people have asked you this because the copy is misleading then I think well frankly - you should step to the plate say its misleading, be straight with the Op who says he's confused, clear the air and change the copy not just drop some reviews and claim that critiques of that don't apply

But hey I'm old school and some would say even cantankerous about not leading people astray. and you know what - they have a point too. I can admit it. I have to work on seeing nonsense and not responding to it more. Dead serious.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Sorry Clint

Your Forgiven Mike as there appears to be some confusion and it is certainly not my intention to cause such. You are suggesting that I made the statement "should not expect to rank within an hour" which in fact is not the case. I clearly stated that I believe OPs question was addressed. In the reviews it points out clearly what a real user can expect, if used properly.

I do not believe that the heading is misleading as it is factual and is intended to lead the reader to the sales letter that clarifies any possible confusion that could possibly arise if read in a typical fashion with common sense.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

Your Forgiven Mike as there appears to be some confusion and it is certainly not my intention to cause such. You are suggesting that I made the statement "should not expect to rank within an hour" which in fact is not the case. I clearly stated that I believe OPs question was addressed.

Unfortunately you don't have a good grasp on language since the sorry would be conditional on you actually having ever answered the OPs question. The only confusion anyone has iscreated by your copy and non answers in this thread. So save your fogiveness because Its not needed by those who are not guilty. Since you are now distancing yourself away from saying that customers should NOT expect to rank within an hour then the OP was right in the way he read your copy. Its you that owes him an apology for being misleading. He doesn't need to hear what you didn't say he needs to hear what you say about him ranking with your software in an hour

The only thing you have clearly done in this thread is fudge so as to not answer the issue the Op raises about what you are implying the software will do for buyers. Deliberately dodging from clarifying can't be considered anything but intentional. Its a simply question. Its very revealing with all the copy and pasting of testimonials etc that you can't even come out and say directly what users should expect by way of ranking in an hour.

Testimonials don't mean squat if a seller can't answer such an easy and simple question directly.

So I'll give you another opportunity to answer the question of the OP and redeem yourself -

Should the OP expect to rank his site within an hour with your revolutionary Google proof software?

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Unfortunately you don't have a good grasp on language

I was merely giving you the benefit of the doubt believing that you were apologizing to me and the members of the forum. As far as your questions I believe they have been addressed and there is nothing to be redeemed from. I do understand your opinion is that they have not been but I cannot continue reiterating.

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

Product owner can talk until their blue in the face about how great and perfect their product is and this tends to get you nowhere. Based on my experience. That is why I try to have my users speak for me.

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

I do not believe that the heading is misleading as it is factual

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

sales letter that clarifies any possible confusion that could possibly arise if read in a typical fashion with common sense.

[mjazhilton]

Originally Posted by ddDonPaul

maybe it will work, but surely it will not boost your rankings in 1 hour, if that`s what you mean...

I have heard about backlinktopia but I haven't tried it yet and
YES, it's quite unbelievable to see ranking results in just one hour. it's absolutely a false promise if they did.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

I was merely giving you the benefit of the doubt believing that you were apologizing to me. As far as your questions I believe they have been addressed and there is nothing to be redeemed from. I do understand your opinion is that they have not been but I cannot continue reiterating.

ROFL - song and dance continues and still no answer to the OP anywhere in this thread. can't answer and can't point to any place in this thread where he tells the Op what to expect within an hour. And Clint I have nothing to apologize to members or you for. Don't know where you get that idea from. If you posts testimonials in a thread in this section it does not have to stand unrebutted and if you don't directly answer questions that the Op raises people have a right to query you on them if you participate in a thread in this section. Its not a WSO thread. People are free to say what they want about a program or service.

Originally Posted by mjazhilton

I have heard about backlinktopia but I haven't tried it yet and
YES, it's quite unbelievable to see ranking results in just one hour. it's absolutely a false promise if they did.

Read the top paragraphs and you will see the OP is not crazy or making it up. the copy clearly implies at least 4 times that YOU the buyer or YOUR site will get the same result with the software.

http://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-...k-profits.html

Now in fairness lower down its called a fluke but thats confusing as well. because the top paragraph imply that the software does it effortless in a hour as a part of what it does not as a fluke. I can take the point that its for attention but at the point = as in this thread - where its causing any kind of confusion or people being misled you have an obligation to clearly correct that.

[vickss]

how is it possible to rank in an hour. Even many keywords are so tough to rank that even 800 bmr posts they move just page three to page 2 for example retirement plans

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

THERE IS NO SOFTWARE THAT PEOPLE CAN USE THAT is "an amazing new “Google proof” system to zoom yourself to page 1 rankings" within an hour.

We have done it meany times before even if it is not topical it shows that it is fact.

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

ROFL -still no answer to the OP anywhere in this thread.

As I was saying

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

they have been addressed

As for as your mistaken apology you could have been referring to any of the personal insults. It is now clear that you are unapologetic. I believe that you have made your intentions here clear.

Originally Posted by freemen14

Mike. Don't write yourself into a corner here

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

Incorrect we have done it meany times before even if it is not topical it shows that it is fact.

Clint theres no reason to continue to go back and forth. I think your headline is misleading and a few of your customer Including the OP have indicated that they find it so also. READ THE OP - The OP is very clear where his understanding is and If you cared one bit about misleading you would see clearly the OP states he thinks your ad implies he will rank in an hour.

If I spend my money on it and dont ahoot pass the comp. In one hour, can I sue for false advertising? I really want to rank my sites. Anyone???

The fact that you will not come out and answer the Op directly says all I need to know. You could tell him no you should not have that expectation or yes you should and then stand behind it. After several posts and pasting of testimonials nowhere in this thread do you answer the Op and tell him whether he should expect to rank in an hour or not.

Why not ? because in most cases in most serps that people go after he will not rank in an hour at all and even more serps he will not rank and stay ranked. So Op take that as your answer. Not hard but for some reason the straight answer was too difficult to give in this thread.

FreeMan was saying about your mistaken assumptons about me personaly It is now clear that you are unapologetic about your mistaken insult.

I have neither made any mistaken asuumptions about you or insulted you personally. Freeman indicated to me that he thought my statement that a product implying you will "Effortlessly" rank in an hour was garbage was off base. It wasn't. Its absolutely ridiculous to have to say this but SEO is not a matter of ranking in an hour in most cases. Claiming that a software has a feature to effortlessly rank you in an hour if you buy it is absurd and its only made worse by having people read your copy come to the same conclusions and then getting nothing but a song and dance about having answered the questions when you STILL have not answered the OP as to whether he should expect to rank in a hour.

Frankly this is why Internet marketing gets such a bad rap. Sales copy confuses buyers and then when a direct question is asked the seller does a long tap dance rather than just coming out and addresing the issue that is being misunderstood or implied. In this case by claiming to have addressing the issue while still not answering it directly.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

...

Yes you are very clear in the fact that you disagree with some of the things that I believe and you are 100% entitled to these beliefs whether incorrect or correct.

You, have made personal insults towards me. That is why I stepped in to try to help clarify but unfortunately because I stepped in to correct these mistaken personal insults against me it has caused nothing but further attacks and ears unwilling to listen.

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Sellers like that choose some weak search term where anyone can rank because no one wants the term and then use that to fool newbies into thinking they will get the same results on real search words.

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

Unfortunately you don't have a good grasp on language

This statement is both incorrect clarified in my original post in this thread and definitely personally directed towards me and insulting. I am not alone and when it comes to this view as you have clearly been given a citation for insults as well as had post removed.

I believe you have gotten your point across and have been very clear with your intentions. Perhaps we can learn from one another, but as we have opposing beliefs, views and understanding it may take some time but only if willing.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

This statement is both incorrect clarified in my original post in this thread and definitely personally directed towards me and insulting.

If you believe you are plural in "Sellers" then you can run with it if you like. BY using sellers I meant it generically. Now I am not dodging from anything - I Do believe your copy is misleading but even more importantly the Op holds the same view.

For the claim that it is incorrect you have provided Zero evidence. It is a common practice of some sellers to rank sites easy to rank and then make claims about it. We ALL know that here in the SEO forum section. Seen it countless times. NO one is under any obligation to take anyones word for anything without evidence and since i don't know the serp or keyword I am under no obligation to take your word for it so it doesn't close the point. Again this is the SEO discussion section of the board not a WSO thread.

Look if you wish to continue posting without answering the OP as you have done numerous times now then proceed. I believe in being clear and straight. In any thread about my product (and thats why you are here not because of any personal insult) where there is even the glimmer of a misunderstanding I would clarify exactly what my promises were and what my customers should expect. Thats the main belief that we disagree on. I have had enough of this back and forth.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

....

I did already post several time that POs original question has been addressed.
I believe I provided adequate evidence to back up the facts. Although yes you do in fact have the right to disagree with what qualifies as "proof"

[bnetwork]

Woah, I remember reading (somewhere) that we're not allowed to talk about/review WSO's anywhere on the forum (apart from the actual WSO thread). And yeah, I'm with Mike on this one. I also think that it's a waste of time to argue about this here, because the thread will be nuked in a bit.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by bnetwork

I also think that it's a waste of time to argue about this here, because the thread will be nuked in a bit.

I am also with you in the fact that arguing can at times gets people nowhere I also believe people need to be open to opposed opinions otherwise war breaks out. Although I understand your point I do not believe it's a waste of time to try to explain methodically a opposed understanding, especially when deflecting personal insults to myself and other warriors.

I typically do not step in to address what I believe to be poorly dressed negativity because I have a huge belief that if I can see that statements are misplaced with inconsistencies, so can others. In this case, because I am a part of this community I feel a obligation I should contribute and clarify based on a general consensus.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Clint Faber

I typically do not step in to address what I believe to be transparent false insults

Lets clear the air here on one thing because like I said I am over the back and forth - If you felt that my post about sellers using copy that was smoke and mirrors and that sometimes sellers rank for sites that are easy and then apply it to the power of their technique or software was too pointed I can see that. Again it wasn't meant to say "Hey Clint Faber is using smoke and mirrors etc" I could write that a little less focused. Its something that not only I but several others have seen in many places with no one individual or even group in mind.

But what we have in this thread is a forum member that is clearly confused by what the copy implies. Its not an opinion. Its clearly stated. Do I see where he gets that confusion from? Yes. So if I see where the confusion is and think the copy is misleading then its personally insulting you? You might be insulted but that does not mean I am out to insult you. To me it was the issues involved not the people.

I don't know you nor do I have anything against you personally so your claim of "transparently false" like there is some hidden agenda that people can see through is your own kind of personal insulting of me. I'll leave it and my participation in this thread right there. unsubscribed

[mattheltzel]

Didn't work for me.

[blueorca17]

I purchased software yesterday.... am gonna test it out in addition to putting my own spin on the technique. Will let everyone know whether it works with my technique or not. The keyword that I'm targeting is already on page one.... but it's sitting at the #9 position. Will update everyone in the next week or two if I see results or not, or sooner if things jump up quicker. Right now I have it set to sync every 30 mins. Stay tuned!

[azTechnique]

Originally Posted by blueorca17

I purchased software yesterday.... am gonna test it out in addition to putting my own spin on the technique. Will let everyone know whether it works with my technique or not. The keyword that I'm targeting is already on page one.... but it's sitting at the #9 position. Will update everyone in the next week or two if I see results or not, or sooner if things jump up quicker. Right now I have it set to sync every 30 mins. Stay tuned!

If the copy states your SERP will increase in an hour, what are your results? Wouldn't this be a software that everyone can review and see that it works in less than a full day. Wouldn't every review state that they are now on page one?

As far as the back and forth between Mike and Clint, I hate when people just don't answer the specific question that was asked and just say look elsewhere and search for the answer. Clint if you just answered the OP &/or Mike's question directly there would have never been this back-and-forth which makes you look like you are purposely avoiding the question as if the true answer would make your product not look as great. To Mike, the copy says "Revolutionary Software Plucks Website From Google’s Abyss... And Effortlessly Zooms It To Page #1 Rankings In UNDER 1 Hour." You have to read slowly to read that it really is just talking about one experience of it. Clint has stated that others have varying results and lists a few testimonials to display that.

However, directly underneath the Download Now button it says "Page One With Just a Few Hours" which I feel is very misleading if it does not work for everyone. But Clint does offer a 60 Day money back guarantee, so that is plenty of time for everyone to evaluate it themselves and get their own results/opinion since who knows what to believe at this point. The software would speak for itself.

[RyanLB]

Originally Posted by discustipated

Anyone used this program? If so, did you really shoot past all the comp. in 1 hour? If so, wouldnt everyone be using this. I dont understand??? If I spend my money on it and dont ahoot pass the comp. In one hour, can I sue for false advertising? I really want to rank my sites. Anyone???

As has been said before there is no such thing as "1 hour magic" solutions in SEO. Google wouldn't even probably be able to crawl your new links in that time.

If it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is. I would learn that way with this service.

Also, the talk about suing is not necessary.

[ChrisDH]

It would have been nice if this thread had stayed as Backlinktopia does it work rather than turning into a Warrior forum bitching match.

[JJP]

In fact… anyone still trying to use these techniques in the “new” age of internet marketing… is going to be left behind.

But this is NOT going to happen to you.

[Becker13]

Yeah it would of been great if people had just posted

Yes it worked for me

or

No it did not.

Mike the only thing confusing in this thread was why you felt the need to post all that

[joerudy1988]

wonderful information and feedback

[DACstyle]

Didn't work for me.

I share a lot of articles with my link and no one was indexed

[Janet Walker]

No software will get you top rankings in an hour.
Backlinktopia did not work for me.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by DACstyle

Didn't work for me.

I share a lot of articles with my link and no one was indexed

Google counts the links to boost your rank and PR even before they index them. I suspect that they have yes been index and you just cant see them, this is all covered in the BLT communety forum.

You can alwas open a ticket at the help desk if you need any more help.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Janet Walker

No software will get you top rankings in an hour.
Backlinktopia did not work for me.

BLT did as shown in the WSO
If you would like help you can open a ticket at the BLT support desk.
Here you can see the speed of effectiveness from just one BLT user.

Originally Posted by delta504

Wow, Clint. *I've been on and off for IM for a few years....finally decided it's time, and actually also finally registered here (mistake I know, should have at my attempt a few years ago).

My issue, like many, has always been with traffic. *I use to design killer flash websites but sucked at promotion....so I just did site freelance work instead. *Starting out, you have no resources aside from the small based network that anyone has online (forums, youtube, ect). *

So I just .. built my first keyword niche site...and while it seems pretty sound, after my site was complete I couldn't find it on the first 5 pages of google even after a few weeks. *So I decided to add your backlink software and after about a day and a half my page climbed up to #1 for the keyword niche I selected. *I was shocked man, thank you so much. *This software is now essential to my system going forward! *

Mike

Hope this helps.

[Mike Anthony]

Originally Posted by Becker13

Mike the only thing confusing in this thread was why you felt the need to post all that

Hey on the internet you meet some people who are just generally confused. I can't help that. IF you read the Op and are confused then what can I say? You would be one of them I guess. OP asked if it worked in an hour and it doesn't. simple.

Incidentally - look up. THis is the discussion section for SEO, adsense etc. We discuss in this section. want strict reviews and only reviews carry it over to the review section.

and Clint - The Op asked a question months ago about ranking in an hour . If you really want to help you might think about finally answering it.

[Clint Faber]

Originally Posted by Mike Anthony

...

I have as you can see.
BLT has and dose work in an hour but if you would like a more average time of effectiveness I have posted some examples above.

[IsaacWendt]

Originally Posted by emasters

Commission Autopilot is better than Backlinktopia.

If commission autopilot is better then it then it must be ****, this type of link building is the biggest short term strategy.