![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Dear Warriors, could you stop for a moment and try to answer on my questions? My 2-3 month sites loosing their positions after getting to the top1-5, i'm trying to use natural slow link building, however i'm used to post to bmr when the site positions are stable at top10-20. usually i'm posting 10 but up to 15 posts, and the sites getting to the top1-5. however soon after that they loosing their positions and moving +30 positions back in average, or they could gone forever (they are indexed, but it's not possible to find the pages by their keywords). now i've a dilemma, should i continue to work on link building for these sites or should i leave they as is? there is also a logical question - should i make bmr posts for 2-3 month old sites, they seems to be very brittle at this age? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Online World...
Posts: 2,922
Thanks: 96
Thanked 530 Times in 269 Posts
|
I think your site still in the index, but Google seems to de-rank them by discounting some of your backlinks, I guess you should try other backlink source and continue to move it up. What backlink service / method are you using now? |
|
Generate Massive Free Targeted Traffic On Automation ==>Nuclear Traffic Storm Turn Your Backlink Into RSS And Get Google To Crawl Them ==> Nuclear Link Crawler Guaranteed To Rank Your Site On Page 1 ========> Guaranteed Ranking Service Powerful Indexer That Makes Your Backlinks Count ==> Nuclear Link Indexer | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
i'm used some manually picked social bookmark sites to push the crawler to the new sites. when the pages got stable positions i'm using articles as well as bmr. i'm going to try put an emphasis on articles instead. will see how this could help, the articles seems having more quality in general. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Took the red pill Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 253
Thanks: 8
Thanked 46 Times in 36 Posts
|
Maybe you are triggering manual reviews when you reach the top. And if that happens, you want to have a natural looking backlink profile. All links coming from random blogs with random posts all having the same format might look fishy.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Online World...
Posts: 2,922
Thanks: 96
Thanked 530 Times in 269 Posts
|
It doesn't matter if you've trigger manual reviews, but I think there are great chances you are being filter by the bot automatically, not by human. You should try Linkvana or AMA, they are good source of backlinks. |
|
Generate Massive Free Targeted Traffic On Automation ==>Nuclear Traffic Storm Turn Your Backlink Into RSS And Get Google To Crawl Them ==> Nuclear Link Crawler Guaranteed To Rank Your Site On Page 1 ========> Guaranteed Ranking Service Powerful Indexer That Makes Your Backlinks Count ==> Nuclear Link Indexer | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Australia
Posts: 292
Thanks: 8
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
|
Diversify your backlinks just like kkchoon has said. Doing 1 type of backlinking can make your site a bit "flimsy" and move up and down a lot. Diversifying the type of backlinks solidifies your platform a bit better and can really help keep SERPS stable.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 475
Thanks: 42
Thanked 68 Times in 47 Posts
| Quote:
Sorry dude.. pet peeve. | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
you was absolutely correct, but absolutely not on the topic =) personally i don't believe it was a manual review, they shouldn't waste such resources on such a tiny issues. i like the idea about discounted links, since bmr posts moving from main pages very quickly. the twinkling links could looks spammy. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| loosing, position, top |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |