![]() | | ||||||||
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, United Kingdom.
Posts: 936
Thanks: 721
Thanked 94 Times in 84 Posts
|
Is it best to comment on blogs which are ranking high in Google search results i.e: top of page 1, for your keyword, or to comment on blogs with a higher Page Rank? i.e PR5.
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 223
Thanks: 9
Thanked 53 Times in 32 Posts
|
This is honestly a difficult one to answer, I think you will get mixed responses. I believe a PR 5+ Website will carry alot of link juice to your website; even if its not relevant to your topic or keyword, its not secrete that high PR is one of the best SEO for googles panda update. Any Websites with PR 0-4 that’s not related to your topic or keyword will carry little link power and weight, while it will of cause be worth it (any backlink is worth it that isn't spam) but personally I wouldn't go looking for lower PR sites for the sake of a link if it isn't relevent. If your doing link building - me personally, I would go for related blogs over high PR for the simple reason of potential traffic for my time (people clicking on my link from a constructive comment. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, United Kingdom.
Posts: 936
Thanks: 721
Thanked 94 Times in 84 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Greece
Posts: 155
Thanks: 9
Thanked 31 Times in 29 Posts
|
Relevance is more important that pagerank (BTW pagerank is only one of 200 ranking factors so don't bother so much) I would prefer getting links from the sites that rank well for the target keywords. In fact I am doing this for years and I can say that it works. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Ca
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Tough question because a PR2 relevant vs a PR7 non-relevant link may prove to be equal. I would start with relevant link building (of any PR) because that's just smart. Once you've done that move on to high PR (5+) non-relevant blogs. IMO any high quality website that's linking to you is going to be beneficial regardless of relevancy. Relevant VS PR links are powerful by themselves let alone together, so try not to overlook either or.
|
| Become an authority in your niche. SEO consulting on an hourly and monthly basis. Rates are as follows: $200/hour | $2,000/month Message me for details and availability. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| PR is slowely becoming less important but it certainly still is important. I would focus a little more on creating the more relevant baclinks at this point. Building a strong relationship between your desired target keywords and your site probably is a better start to get yourself rising in the rankings.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Banned War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Australia
Posts: 120
Thanks: 34
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
|
I've found the best back links for a site are high PR (3 and above) and relevant to the topic of the site you're promoting. Those get the best results. Next best are high PR sites that aren't related to the topic of your site. You should throw in a few low PR links, too, so the linking pattern looks natural to Google, but be careful to not link to auto-approve sites with hundreds (or thousands) of comments or to spammy sites, because that won't help your rankings at all. High quality, even with lower PR sites, is essential.
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 57
Thanked 201 Times in 177 Posts
|
Well, if I had a choice and both had the same PR I'd definitely go for the relevant link. But if the non-relevant link is PR5 and the relevant link is PR3, I'm going with the non-relevant link every time. That said, relevant backlinks can occasionally drive a pretty good amount of traffic themselves. But for ranking, I'm taking the higher PR link. |
| DOFOLLOW BLOG COMMENTING BACKLINKS CLICK HERE For 108,341 *DOFOLLOW* Blog Post URLs From 4,839 Unique Blogs 100% DoFollow / 100% Open For Comments / 1,912 PR1-PR5 Posts / Just 8 Packages Remaining | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: London, UK
Posts: 277
Thanks: 11
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
I would just say that a link is a link.. But you should comment on relevant blogs
|
|
The TRUTH About Making Money Online? Go To This Secret Web Page Now... ==> http://www.internetbusinessincome.org/ | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| SEO Guy Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Asia
Posts: 61
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Yes both is important but I think relevant links are more counted by our Big G.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: USA
Posts: 72
Thanks: 5
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
|
If it's relevant based on the SERPS, then go with that one.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 57
Thanked 201 Times in 177 Posts
| |
| DOFOLLOW BLOG COMMENTING BACKLINKS CLICK HERE For 108,341 *DOFOLLOW* Blog Post URLs From 4,839 Unique Blogs 100% DoFollow / 100% Open For Comments / 1,912 PR1-PR5 Posts / Just 8 Packages Remaining | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| blogs, comment, google, high, higher, keyword, page, rank |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |