Is Senuke ever going to "fix" it's poor success rates?

[TopHats]

The success rates of Senuke have been dropping like a dead bird lately for me and I have to wonder out loud... do they intend to fix it?

They need MORE "social network" article directories... I'm getting 30-something usually and frankly I feel that my monthly payment should get me a few more sites than that. They really should add more active sites and do SOMETHING to improve the success rates.

But is this something that they even CAN fix with an update... or is Senuke a dying tool?

[MikeFriedman]

Check out Magic Submitter. Works much better and has more sites.

[TopHats]

Yeah, I have the Magic line in mind, as well as AMR and AD... but I might just invest the time to create my own bot with ubot instead. Getting REALLY sick of these guys taking my money month after month and then not keeping their tools up-to-date with high success rates and new sites to post to. It's BS.

[MikeFriedman]

They are busy collecting even more money from the fools who signed up for the Nuke4Me service.

It is hard for any of these type of product creators to keep up with sites that make changes, but I think it is reasonable to expect an update within 3-5 days after their bot stops submitting successfully to a site.

[echelon]

While I am not using Senuke (I have used it in the past), the submission rate of the other software (Magic Submitter) I have used was normally lower than 100%. I can't tell you exactly how much because I don't remember the number and I don't use it anymore.

I have heard about ubot for the creation of software. Do you think that the learning curve will be lower than learning something like python?

[patrich]

I quit using SeNuke quite a long time ago for the very same reasons. Everyone talks about how great the program is, but if I am paying that kind of money I expect it to be running top notch all the time. Now, I don't expect 100% submission rates, etc., because sh*t happens from time to time. But, with that being said, I expect problems fixed within 48 hours and everything to be properly maintained. Which, when I was using SeNuke, it never was.

The problem with these monthly software providers, SeNuke especially, is they get so damn focused on their latest greatest service that they all but forget about the people that are making their paychecks possible every month. I find that very irritating.

Anyways, back to your question, probably not, there will always be problem after problem with these type of programs because they are in it for the money, not the customers.

I would recommend using Ubot to automate some of this stuff without the monthly fees. You can do everything that SeNuke can do with Ubot and it is a one off cost.

An even better option is learning some C# and rolling your own program to do all of this, which is what I did. Less hassle and if I ever decide to sell my own "SeNuke" later on down the road, I have that option.

[timpears]

For $150 a month, they should either get it working or refund people's money. I never bought into the SEnuke thing because of the high cost, and I was suspicious of what it could do. Looks like that decision was the right one after all.

[MikeFriedman]

Originally Posted by timpears

For $150 a month, they should either get it working or refund people's money.

LOL. Not a chance of that happening. When they launched Nuke4Me it was a complete cluster **** and they weren't offering refunds even though the service was completely below what was promised. If they didn't do it then, I doubt they ever would.

[aaronclancy]

I stayed away from Nuke4me and also have stayed away from SENUKE. I prefer paying someone to manually do the work. Blogging Underground is working well.

[TopHats]

Well I think it's shameful and frankly if it doesn't get better I'm quitting Senuke for good. Its their article dir's and "social network" article submissions that are PATHETICALLY unsuccessful for me. I'm stuck submitting to the SAME 30 or so sites over and over... googles not dumb, they will catch on to that. WTF.

[JamieSEO]

For me the final straw with SENukeX was when they just REMOVED the video submission module rather than fixing it. It did not work properly for months, so instead of a fix, they just take it out? WTF?!

I cancelled the next day.

SENukeX was a good piece of software when it first came out, but unfortunately went downhill after

If you are looking for something similar but better quality, at the moment I recommend Magic Submitter. Less than half the price per month, but more than double the quality!

[nik0]

Its always the same with these softwares, when submission software gets offered with a fixed one time fee, everyone is yelling, don't expect anything from it, they must get paid monthly to keep the software up to date.

And with these montly services it is exactly the same, I wonder which excuse they want to use. How hard can it be to keep software updated when you have dozens of customers using it, no they rather get a bad name through multiple IM forums like this one and lose all sales eventually. How retarded can you be as such company.

Ps: I would recommend ZennoPoster instead of uBot to take care of your own web2.0 properties, Zenno is a lot less buggy then uBot.

Simply cause what is Senuke / MagicSubmitter / Seolinkrobot really doing? Articles, bookmarks and web2.0's is about it:

- Articles use AMR or HighPRsociety which is quite cost effective to get great results
- Bookmarks there is BMD or buy a fiverr gig for $5 for 500 bookmarks.
- Web2.0's are the only thing we use these all-in-one softwares for and they fail huge at that.

[nik0]

Originally Posted by JamieSEO

For me the final straw with SENukeX was when they just REMOVED the video submission module rather than fixing it. It did not work properly for months, so instead of a fix, they just take it out? WTF?!

I cancelled the next day.

SENukeX was a good piece of software when it first came out, but unfortunately went downhill after

If you are looking for something similar but better quality, at the moment I recommend Magic Submitter. Less than half the price per month, but more than double the quality!

I used MagicSubmitter a year ago and was hugely dissapointed with their succesrates on web2.0's, I know you can fix them yourself but I ain't paying monthly fee's to fix it myself.

Back to the present, to how many web2.0 platforms can you post succesfully right now with magicsubmitter wihout having to fix things yourself?

[nik0]

Originally Posted by MikeFriedman

It is hard for any of these type of product creators to keep up with sites that make changes, but I think it is reasonable to expect an update within 3-5 days after their bot stops submitting successfully to a site.

How is it hard to keep up with these changes when they collect $150/month for each client???? They only have like 100 web2.0/social property's in their system and that is what most people mainly use it for. They can easily hire one person fulltime to deal with these 100 sites, even a part timer could keep up with so few sites, its not like each site changes their sign up/submitting proces every week or month. It's the least you should expect for such price.

I think I should write a nice review about SenukeX and rate it to 1/10 on my review site, no matter how many vpns or proxys I will need for that to manipulate it and rank it nicely at the top of page 1.

[JamieSEO]

Originally Posted by nik0

I used MagicSubmitter a year ago and was hugely dissapointed with their succesrates on web2.0's, I know you can fix them yourself but I ain't paying monthly fee's to fix it myself.

Back to the present, to how many web2.0 platforms can you post succesfully right now with magicsubmitter wihout having to fix things yourself?

For me, Magic Submitter is ideal, because I setup my own unique web2.0, forum urls, etc. Once they have been created, I use them and don't have to worry about what others are doing with the software since I am not always using the same sites they are.

The way I measure success has nothing to do with the "successful" number of links created, but rather the successful number of high quality links created.

Getting a backlink with an authority ranking over 50% is worth one hell of a lot more than a bazillion links that have poor authority.

For the best results, you definitely want to customize any submission software. SENukeX is not very customizable, but Magic Submitter is.

It takes hours to customize your different sites to submit to, but it is worth it in the long run

My advice is to email the Magic Submitter guys and explain why you don't have confidence in their service, then see if you can get an extended free trial or something to give it another go.

[nik0]

So why you chose to pay $69/month if you can buy ZennoPoster for a one-time fee? And it's even capable of automating more tasks. I was just curious how many sites MS succesfully posts to without any tweaking.