![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Around the World
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
After conducting a multitude of tests on blog networks with 100% original articles that were poorly written (though grammatically correct), I’ve come to the conclusion that Google does not place a value on whether an article is well-written or not. I believe that the important thing is that our article is original, regardless of quality, as long as it does not contain grammatical errors. I think that it’s possible we’re wasting resources seeking quality content for ranking our web pages and these efforts would be better directed to finding original content, with no spinning. What do you think? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| SEO & Article Writing Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 610
Thanks: 204
Thanked 94 Times in 60 Posts
|
For the SEO purposes, you're absolutely correct. The algorithms today couldn't possibly be so sophisticated to distinct between the levels of quality of the given text, other than using parameters such as LSI. So yeah, as long as you're "on topic", original and gramatically correct, you needn't be Ernest Hemingway to reap the SEO benefits of your articles. ![]() P.S. The spun articles are heavily debatable though. This I believe is just a matter of time when the algorithms will be able to detect... but that's just my opinion as a programmer. |
| Are You Tired of Bad SEO Services? >> Get my Professional Blog Commenting Service For Just $2/Link! << | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Around the World
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Thank you very much for your response. This is the point: It is possible that the majority of “spun articles” are already being detected by Google, but still, it’s not likely that Google is capable of detecting the quality of a post. So, I think that we should concentrate our efforts on the creation of articles that are 100% original, without worrying about their quality. Cheers | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Just Me War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Texas, USA.
Posts: 1,404
Thanks: 39
Thanked 141 Times in 123 Posts
|
IMO, your missing a large chuck of the equation here. Content by means of quanity vs. quality effects your site reputation. In order for your site to gain any reputation from your submitted content, you need to attract legitimate visitors via a link from the content body or resource. It is the quality of the content that attracts the visitor to your site, not the gibberish. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Around all of you!
Posts: 130
Thanks: 5
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
After google's panda update, you have to produce quality content. So you are totally right for SEO purpose.
|
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| articles, backlinks, intext, wellwritten |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |