Same blog different sites

[opportunist86]

Can we copy paste same blog on different web 2.0 blog sites? Will it be deleted or if google will not count the link?

[coolspot]

it will get picked up as duplicate content at some point and you risk losing traffic to you site/s. pages may even get delisted and all sorts. best to keep your content unique to each site if possible.

[paulgl]

I guess you people have never heard of going viral...

Plenty people republish some of the blogs they have seen...
even here in threads.

If there was any mythical duplicate content penalty, then
all we'd have to do is just find a blog, copy it and
BOOM! Instant takedown of our competition!

Don't you think this is the way article sites work? They
want you to republish...

Paul

[MikeFriedman]

Originally Posted by paulgl

I guess you people have never heard of going viral...

Plenty people republish some of the blogs they have seen...
even here in threads.

If there was any mythical duplicate content penalty, then
all we'd have to do is just find a blog, copy it and
BOOM! Instant takedown of our competition!

Don't you think this is the way article sites work? They
want you to republish...

Paul

Not to mention that every news site that syndicates articles from the Associated Press would be screwed...

[Sharyn Sheldon]

Duplicate content is content that appears on more than one page on the SAME site. That's what Google doesn't like.

However, there are some web 2.0 sites that don't want you to have the same content as another site. I had a Wordpress.com site shut down because it had the same posts as on a Blogger site. Same thing with Squidoo (or Hubpages, can't remember).

On the flip side, syndicated news articles are the same idea and there's nothing wrong with them.

Can't hurt to try. However, I never copy my main money site's content to anywhere else. Some people do. I just prefer not to.

[Matt Baker]

I prefer not to copy others content because I know Google HATES it.. Why not outsource an article writer?

[paulgl]

Originally Posted by Matt Baker

I prefer not to copy others content because I know Google HATES it.. Why not outsource an article writer?

Does that mean they hate wikipedia, amazon, gasbuddy, NYT, CNN,
Foxnews, ezinearticles, etc...not to mention every single song
lyric site on the planet...as well as their own news sites that they
tell you to republish on your own site?

This duplicate content nonsense became a problem for the
panic stricken way back when, and has been hard to shake.

Every single sentence spewed by google, has been skewered,
broasted, baked, barbecued, until the original statement has
just been lost.

Just like the crazed people becoming zombies over the
new ad placement algo...forgetting to actually read the
details and the context of the whole idea....along with
losing the facts, of course.

Why muddle up good myths and stories with facts,
logic, and context?

Here's a tip. Don't use those post to facebook buttons again....
Just think. A whole sub-zero sneak attack has been going on
as they came up with a perfect way for people to penalize
themselves...and not even know it...just one example of
the conspiracy...albeit a little lame....but hope some get the
picture.

Paul

[Hossain]

Ok lets do an experiment. We all know google loves warriorforum and google usually index every thread of this forum within few hours. Now

1- copy an article from a google indexed link
2- start a new thread and post in inside of the thread.
3- after few hours See what happen?
4- see what happen after some days, weeks and even months.

[dminorfmajor]

I love Paul. He may come off as pompous but only cold, hard truth spews from his mouth. lol

Originally Posted by paulgl

Does that mean they hate wikipedia, amazon, gasbuddy, NYT, CNN,
Foxnews, ezinearticles, etc...not to mention every single song
lyric site on the planet...as well as their own news sites that they
tell you to republish on your own site?

This duplicate content nonsense became a problem for the
panic stricken way back when, and has been hard to shake.

Every single sentence spewed by google, has been skewered,
broasted, baked, barbecued, until the original statement has
just been lost.

Just like the crazed people becoming zombies over the
new ad placement algo...forgetting to actually read the
details and the context of the whole idea....along with
losing the facts, of course.

Why muddle up good myths and stories with facts,
logic, and context?

Here's a tip. Don't use those post to facebook buttons again....
Just think. A whole sub-zero sneak attack has been going on
as they came up with a perfect way for people to penalize
themselves...and not even know it...just one example of
the conspiracy...albeit a little lame....but hope some get the
picture.

Paul

[Anna Howard]

Google wont be delete any sch content, it will just lower the rank and authority of the page where you are going to post such content.

[opportunist86]

Originally Posted by paulgl

Does that mean they hate wikipedia, amazon, gasbuddy, NYT, CNN,
Foxnews, ezinearticles, etc...not to mention every single song
lyric site on the planet...as well as their own news sites that they
tell you to republish on your own site?

This duplicate content nonsense became a problem for the
panic stricken way back when, and has been hard to shake.

Every single sentence spewed by google, has been skewered,
broasted, baked, barbecued, until the original statement has
just been lost.

Just like the crazed people becoming zombies over the
new ad placement algo...forgetting to actually read the
details and the context of the whole idea....along with
losing the facts, of course.

Why muddle up good myths and stories with facts,
logic, and context?

Here's a tip. Don't use those post to facebook buttons again....
Just think. A whole sub-zero sneak attack has been going on
as they came up with a perfect way for people to penalize
themselves...and not even know it...just one example of
the conspiracy...albeit a little lame....but hope some get the
picture.

Paul

But if ezine articles republishes your content, they must be making some some changes like spinning.
If you still are sure that adding same blogs doesn't matter, you've helped me solving a big problem.
Thnaks.

[danlew]

I think it will be treated as duplicate content. It's better that you should rewrite or spin the articles first before publishing them to other blogs or Web 2.0 properties.

[MikeFriedman]

Originally Posted by opportunist86

But if ezine articles republishes your content, they must be making some some changes like spinning.
If you still are sure that adding same blogs doesn't matter, you've helped me solving a big problem.
Thnaks.

Anything republished from Ezine is supposed to be used as is, no changes are allowed.