3 Standards Keyword Research proposed by the GURU Based on SEO Competitor Strength

Khalid Abdullah · 02-03-2012, 12:33 AM

Standards Keyword Research Proposed by The Several GURUs Based on SEO Competitor Strength!!!

For Keyword Which We Target!

One thing you need to know that there are no absolute rights or wrongs in the target or the standard of keyword research! It all depends on yourself.

Take for example; if the Guru A says that the standard keyword that can be won easily is that a, b, c, and so on. The standard that he considers as “easy” may not be as easy as you can think of, especially for those who just knew the blog world.

Another example: if I’m really eager to win a keyword, I don’t need to conduct such research about the competitor’s strength. It is because I can count on my own SEO. Even though the keyword is really tough to win (as long as I don’t intend to win only certain keywords like “download”, “mp3”, “weight loss”), I’d fight for winning the keyword.

So, whatever your target or standard is, it is better for you to consider the competitor research and strengths as the comparison. You also need to know that you have to fit it with your skills and also your resources about SEO. That’s all you’ve got to do.

Let’s move to the point!

Glou

Glou is actually a popular person in my country, Indonesia. Here is what he has taught.
Don’t go after certain keywords which the front page represents certain keywords won by certain sites as follow:

1. Wikipedia
2. Amazon
3. PR 6
4. Certain sites that have site link

Sites that have site link can occur you type the keyword on Google (you will find this kind of example if you search at google.co.id).

Another example: if you are at google.co.id and put targeted keyword like “blogdolar” or “zaiful anwar”, the first thing that occurs in the first list is the site that has site link. According to Glou, it is not recommended for you to go after that keyword.

AmazonMinisiteShortcut.Com

I’m only sharing with you about this standard or criterion to win keyword to play at Amazon. I don’t seem to be sure if this technique from AMS is eligible or not for all keywords.

The standards proposed by AMS are seemingly easy to follow.

1. Use Serpattacks software (it’s available for free, so that you can simply follow the instructions).
2. If you have searched and checked the keyword by using this software, and then there are 2 sites which have the backlink under 50 on the page one, you have to take that keyword.

If you have found that keyword, take that! It’s because the keyword is eligible and easy to win. It is in line with what AMS states.

OnlineProfitsX.Com

It’s actually one of the products by Welly Mulia. But, I’ve read this standard in a free e-book. Well, if I’m not mistaken, the e-book is published by SEO nitro.

Here are the standards:

If you type a keyword on Google, you can take the keyword if you meet the following situations:

1. TOP 3 Sites, Page rank below 3
2. Average TOP 10, Page rank below 3

Things you will need:
1. Browser Mozilla
2. Add On SEO Queke

An example of Keyword that is NOT Recommended for you to get! : Dog Training

Why? It’s simply because it violates the both!
Firstly, the TOP 3 sites have the range of page link of 6, 3, and 4. In fact, based on the first standard or criterion, the page rank of the TOP 3 sites must be below 3.

Secondly, the average page rank of the TOP 10 sites is above 2. The page rank of the sites that are on the page one are: 6, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2.

It all sums up 38.

38 : 10 = 3,8!

It means that it disobey or violate the second standard or criterion that the average page rank of TOP 10 sites must be below 3.

The End:

Well, I’ve shared three standards with you all. Feel free to apply them directly, by adjusting them with your own skills. I expect the standards I’ve given you can be really useful for you.

And for myself, I consider these standards are valuable and accurate for certain sites.

thatkeywordguy · 02-03-2012, 01:59 AM

The title of this post is pretty cool.

Delois · 02-03-2012, 02:39 AM

It is pretty much interesting stuff about keyword research. People also used to rely on certain keyword research tool which might not giving you the best suggestion. Most general keywords are going to be much competitive and you don't need to do any research for it you can use your sense. The keywords which are not that much general and can be achieved with less efforts are good to work for instead of giving all priorities and focus on most competitive general keywords.

Delois · 02-03-2012, 02:46 AM

It is pretty much interesting stuff about keyword research. People also used to rely on certain keyword research tool which might not giving you the best suggestion. Most general keywords are going to be much competitive and you don't need to do any research for it you can use your sense. The keywords which are not that much general and can be achieved with less efforts are good to work for instead of giving all priorities and focus on most competitive general keywords.

02-03-2012, 12:33 AM	#1
Khalid Abdullah Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia Posts: 70 Thanks: 9 Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts Social Networking Contact Info	3 Standards Keyword Research proposed by the GURU Based on SEO Competitor Strength Standards Keyword Research Proposed by The Several GURUs Based on SEO Competitor Strength!!! For Keyword Which We Target! One thing you need to know that there are no absolute rights or wrongs in the target or the standard of keyword research! It all depends on yourself. Take for example; if the Guru A says that the standard keyword that can be won easily is that a, b, c, and so on. The standard that he considers as “easy” may not be as easy as you can think of, especially for those who just knew the blog world. Another example: if I’m really eager to win a keyword, I don’t need to conduct such research about the competitor’s strength. It is because I can count on my own SEO. Even though the keyword is really tough to win (as long as I don’t intend to win only certain keywords like “download”, “mp3”, “weight loss”), I’d fight for winning the keyword. So, whatever your target or standard is, it is better for you to consider the competitor research and strengths as the comparison. You also need to know that you have to fit it with your skills and also your resources about SEO. That’s all you’ve got to do. Let’s move to the point! Glou Glou is actually a popular person in my country, Indonesia. Here is what he has taught. Don’t go after certain keywords which the front page represents certain keywords won by certain sites as follow: 1. Wikipedia 2. Amazon 3. PR 6 4. Certain sites that have site link Sites that have site link can occur you type the keyword on Google (you will find this kind of example if you search at google.co.id). Another example: if you are at google.co.id and put targeted keyword like “blogdolar” or “zaiful anwar”, the first thing that occurs in the first list is the site that has site link. According to Glou, it is not recommended for you to go after that keyword. AmazonMinisiteShortcut.Com I’m only sharing with you about this standard or criterion to win keyword to play at Amazon. I don’t seem to be sure if this technique from AMS is eligible or not for all keywords. The standards proposed by AMS are seemingly easy to follow. 1. Use Serpattacks software (it’s available for free, so that you can simply follow the instructions). 2. If you have searched and checked the keyword by using this software, and then there are 2 sites which have the backlink under 50 on the page one, you have to take that keyword. If you have found that keyword, take that! It’s because the keyword is eligible and easy to win. It is in line with what AMS states. OnlineProfitsX.Com It’s actually one of the products by Welly Mulia. But, I’ve read this standard in a free e-book. Well, if I’m not mistaken, the e-book is published by SEO nitro. Here are the standards: If you type a keyword on Google, you can take the keyword if you meet the following situations: 1. TOP 3 Sites, Page rank below 3 2. Average TOP 10, Page rank below 3 Things you will need: 1. Browser Mozilla 2. Add On SEO Queke An example of Keyword that is NOT Recommended for you to get! : Dog Training Why? It’s simply because it violates the both! Firstly, the TOP 3 sites have the range of page link of 6, 3, and 4. In fact, based on the first standard or criterion, the page rank of the TOP 3 sites must be below 3. Secondly, the average page rank of the TOP 10 sites is above 2. The page rank of the sites that are on the page one are: 6, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2. It all sums up 38. 38 : 10 = 3,8! It means that it disobey or violate the second standard or criterion that the average page rank of TOP 10 sites must be below 3. The End: Well, I’ve shared three standards with you all. Feel free to apply them directly, by adjusting them with your own skills. I expect the standards I’ve given you can be really useful for you. And for myself, I consider these standards are valuable and accurate for certain sites.
	* Oh My God Backlinks Service! Have You Seen? Click Here! * Oia, Adsense Get CTR >10%? This is My Simple Tips

02-03-2012, 01:59 AM	#2
thatkeywordguy KeywordResearcher.org Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 266 Thanks: 93 Thanked 69 Times in 34 Posts Social Networking	Re: 3 Standards Keyword Research proposed by the GURU Based on SEO Competitor Strength The title of this post is pretty cool.
	FIND LONG TAIL KEYWORDS. Come see my latest program: KeywordResearcher.org Download the Free Trial or find "Long Tail Keywords" from your web browser. $8 Dollar Coupon for Warrior Forum Members! Want to be an AFFILIATE? Affiliates earn 45% per sale via Clickbank!

02-03-2012, 02:39 AM	#3
Delois Active Warrior Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 63 Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post	Re: 3 Standards Keyword Research proposed by the GURU Based on SEO Competitor Strength It is pretty much interesting stuff about keyword research. People also used to rely on certain keyword research tool which might not giving you the best suggestion. Most general keywords are going to be much competitive and you don't need to do any research for it you can use your sense. The keywords which are not that much general and can be achieved with less efforts are good to work for instead of giving all priorities and focus on most competitive general keywords.
	New York Web Design

02-03-2012, 02:46 AM	#4
Delois Active Warrior Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 63 Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post	Re: 3 Standards Keyword Research proposed by the GURU Based on SEO Competitor Strength It is pretty much interesting stuff about keyword research. People also used to rely on certain keyword research tool which might not giving you the best suggestion. Most general keywords are going to be much competitive and you don't need to do any research for it you can use your sense. The keywords which are not that much general and can be achieved with less efforts are good to work for instead of giving all priorities and focus on most competitive general keywords.
	New York Web Design