Build My RanK. BMR

[sovereignn]

Originally Posted by mosthost

If your BMR posts are PR 4 then you have been very busy building backlinks to that page. Let's try and get back to reality for a second.

The OP was talking about an 'average BMR post,' not one that you build backlinks to. That's a secondary expense and additional time.

I do not backlink to any of my bmr posts

[GGpaul]

Originally Posted by mosthost

This is the Achilles heel of this program. You have to 'keep paying' and 'keep writing.'

All the while your competitors are using autoposting networks and are gaining 4,500% more backlinks than you are every day.

After you notice every last post you ever made was PR N/A, you'll probably lose a lot of the passion you have for using the service.

I don't mind about "keep writing". I have all the damn time in the world. I also type and think super fast to post an easy 150 words that gets accepted all the time. I will never pay for someone to write these easy articles to post on BMR.

[mandos123]

How do you work with AMR?

1) How long article do you usually make? 300 or more words?
2) How much do you spun this version? blabla|blabla|blabla or bla|bla|bla|bla|bla|blabla?
3) How big submission do you usually make? Or do you drip-feed? Is 200 instantly + 1000 drip feed (70 per day) OK idea?

Questions for BMR users:

1)How many article submissions do you usually make per month for 1 website? How many different domains do you prefer to use (5,10,20 or more?

2)Is 50 article submissions to BMR better than 400 contextual backlinks from PR0-1 article directories?

Sorry for so many questions, I would jut like to get bit clearer in this area.
Thanks.

[DynaPass]

My main concern with BMR is that if you are supplying all this content to these sites, why not create your own site and build its pagerank... then link to your money site through those entities you created? That way you control the flow of SEO. It may take longer but seems like in the long run it would pay off... unless you are planning on only doing SEO for a little while. Hmmm.

[GGpaul]

Originally Posted by mandos123

How do you work with AMR?

1) How long article do you usually make? 300 or more words?
2) How much do you spun this version? blabla|blabla|blabla or bla|bla|bla|bla|bla|blabla?
3) How big submission do you usually make? Or do you drip-feed? Is 200 instantly + 1000 drip feed (70 per day) OK idea?

Questions for BMR users:

1)How many article submissions do you usually make per month for 1 website? How many different domains do you prefer to use (5,10,20 or more?

2)Is 50 article submissions to BMR better than 400 contextual backlinks from PR0-1 article directories?

Sorry for so many questions, I would jut like to get bit clearer in this area.
Thanks.

I use 5 domains - I submit 4-6 a day. I just started a week ago.

[Bryan V]

450+ words should get higher acceptance rates especially since you have to put part of that towards the resource box anyways. It's really not that much more effort to get 450.

Just auto-spin 5-ish variations and go. I usually do a single blast, no drip. These are going to be for anchor text variation and/or 2nd tier linking mostly.


I would definitely take 50 unique content BMR posts on higher PR sites over an auto-spun article to 400/4,000 low PR auto-approve directories.

[JeanneLynn]

Some people have said that you have to do 300 word posts on BMR to get the maximum effects, but I mostly just do 150 word ones. I have done about (10) 300 word posts and about (10)450 word posts. I've done just under 200 posts total. I guess it just depends on how much time you have to write. I may experiment with different keywords/post lengths and see if the longer posts make a difference.

[hobokook]

I know Google doesn't like it when you buy backlinks, but isn't using Build My Rank (BMR) considered buying backlinks?

Will Google ever catch on to BMR and penalize all the people who have used it?

I'm thinking of getting BMR but I'm kinda scared that it'll hurt me more than help me.

Thanks

[GyuMan82]

Lots of people have good results with BMR I wouldn't be concerned with getting slapped because of it.

I do think though there are better ways to improve your rankings though before plunking down for BMR.

[GyuMan82]

Originally Posted by mandos123

How do you work with AMR?

1) How long article do you usually make? 300 or more words?
2) How much do you spun this version? blabla|blabla|blabla or bla|bla|bla|bla|bla|blabla?
3) How big submission do you usually make? Or do you drip-feed? Is 200 instantly + 1000 drip feed (70 per day) OK idea?

Sorry for so many questions, I would jut like to get bit clearer in this area.
Thanks.

1). Minimum 4-500 words.
2). Depends what kind of results you want. I always spin to minimum 90%. Takes more time but it will save you more time in the long run.
3). Don't drip feed it's a waste of time. Just blast it out all at once.

[ttkim]

Everyone I know that uses BMR has gotten good results.

[DPM70]

Originally Posted by hobokook

I know Google doesn't like it when you buy backlinks, but isn't using Build My Rank (BMR) considered buying backlinks?

Will Google ever catch on to BMR and penalize all the people who have used it?

I'm thinking of getting BMR but I'm kinda scared that it'll hurt me more than help me.

Thanks

Like everyone else is saying it has boosted my sites in the short term. Always looking to diversify and change tack, though, because I'm sure this won't last forever. And you are right to question it.

[JSProjects]

Highly doubt it. A ton of people have success with BMR.

[swym]

Have great success with BMR so far. Will continue using it as long as it works.

[bhuff85]

While I highly recommend BMR, you still need to diversify your backlink portfolio and try to get links from other sources. Always good to have a good mix of various types of links and not rely on just one source.

[hobokook]

Originally Posted by bhuff85

While I highly recommend BMR, you still need to diversify your backlink portfolio and try to get links from other sources. Always good to have a good mix of various types of links and not rely on just one source.

Like what other sources?

[TBInternetMarketing]

Originally Posted by hobokook

I know Google doesn't like it when you buy backlinks, but isn't using Build My Rank (BMR) considered buying backlinks?

Will Google ever catch on to BMR and penalize all the people who have used it?

I'm thinking of getting BMR but I'm kinda scared that it'll hurt me more than help me.

Thanks

Personally I haven't had any problems and this is one of my main backlink methods. Just don't always post to the same category. That's my advice.

[pwtmike]

Google can't tell if a link was purchased and built, or just built... If you were an algorithm, how could you ever know that?

[danols]

I would just leave it and maximize the value for your existing domains. The thing is that the most expensive part of BMR are the posts themselves. Regardless if you outsource them for $0.6-0.7 each or write them yourself (you time has to be worth something right?)

[danlew]

I don't think Build My Rank will get you penalized by Google, I have no problems with them until now. Just think that BMR is still one of the best private blog networks out there, you won't get disappointed with them.

[learnrope]

Just think that BMR is still one of the best private blog networks out there,

Google can't tell if a link was purchased and built, or just built.

Will Google ever catch on to BMR and penalize all the people who have used it?

Not until the G ask a staff member to find BMR blogs and then penalize all the people who bought links on them to trick G. I have never used BRM and I have a list of 37 blogs I am 99.9% sure are BMR blogs. Really not hard to find them, particularly if you have some sites and use their services, you just have to look at your backlinks. Only a matter of time till people are screaming here, all my sites I back linked with BMR have been slapped to position 999+ or been deindexed.

[mert]

Just an idea: Without sharing your account, you can add other people's domain names in your own account with a fee. You can just say you have two available spots..

[mert]

It has boosted my sites in the short term like the other said. They are so pick on URL and BMR post submission. This is a good signal...

[mosthost]

Originally Posted by learnrope

Just think that BMR is still one of the best private blog networks out there,

Google can't tell if a link was purchased and built, or just built.

Will Google ever catch on to BMR and penalize all the people who have used it?

Not until the G ask a staff member to find BMR blogs and then penalize all the people who bought links on them to trick G. I have never used BRM and I have a list of 37 blogs I am 99.9% sure are BMR blogs. Really not hard to find them, particularly if you have some sites and use their services, you just have to look at your backlinks. Only a matter of time till people are screaming here, all my sites I back linked with BMR have been slapped to position 999+ or been deindexed.

You think that Google will de-index every site they 'find' in BMR? Seems a bit over-the-top, IMHO.

Will they 'devalue' the links? Probably. Will they completely delete the linked-to websites from the Internet? Seems extreme! What if there are innocent victims in there?

If you've had a website for a long time, you'll find all kinds of very sketchy links from competitors.

[halfpoint]

Originally Posted by learnrope

[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]Will Google ever catch on to BMR and penalize all the people who have used it?

Not until the G ask a staff member to find BMR blogs and then penalize all the people who bought links on them to trick G. I have never used BRM and I have a list of 37 blogs I am 99.9% sure are BMR blogs. Really not hard to find them, particularly if you have some sites and use their services, you just have to look at your backlinks. Only a matter of time till people are screaming here, all my sites I back linked with BMR have been slapped to position 999+ or been deindexed.

Domains will get deindexed, that's inevitable, but new domains will replace them and the network will continue to grow.

This is not just the case of BMR, but all blog networks.

They have been around for years and are not going anywhere.

[nicktyler]

Originally Posted by mosthost

You think that Google will de-index every site they 'find' in BMR? Seems a bit over-the-top, IMHO.

Will they 'devalue' the links? Probably. Will they completely delete the linked-to websites from the Internet? Seems extreme! What if there are innocent victims in there?

If you've had a website for a long time, you'll find all kinds of very sketchy links from competitors.

THIS!!!

If it works it works just be aware that it may not work forever.

[mosthost]

Originally Posted by nicktyler

THIS!!!

If it works it works just be aware that it may not work forever.

Of course. That's when people usually get confused and say 'My website has been penalized!"

All that happens in most of the cases is that backlinks have been devalued. That's not a penalty, it's just a demotion back to where you ranked before the links gave a benefit.

That's the reason you end up having to keep on adding links, even if you rank highly. Some amount of backlinks are always falling off. This is even true of 'editorially given' links or any kind. The internet is always changing!

[lukemeister]

I've been hiring writers on oDesk from time to time to do BMR posts, it works well if I have a bunch of writing I need to do and don't feel like doing it myself. I usually get about 100 posts for about 80-100 dollars. I've never gotten anything for cheaper than that but have seen the listings for super cheap BMR posts.

However, as another person mentioned, using something like Dragon Naturally Speaking makes it super easy to crank out tons of posts on your own. I think I did about 25 posts in an hour the other night, that's just one example. Just talk conversationally and it works well and is easy to do. It's hard to justify BMR outsourcing costs when I can generate that many posts on my own in a short amount of time. But I do like to outsource as well if I'm feeling lazy or time is tight.

[setsune]

Hi all,
do you usually write your BMR articles by yourselves or outsource it? If you outsource, where is your recommended services? I'm planning to use BMR but I don't think I've time to write 10 articles everyday.

BTW, is your post for BMR must be related with your niche site?

Thank you in advance for your answers.

[rinor81]

OK,

Have to say a good thing about BMR here and their help, I've asked them to explain to me what the problems with my posts were and they did point by point so I knew exactly what it was that I needed to fix.

A great help to get a rejected post to be approved after following their fixes.

Great service. Thank you!

[nik0]

Originally Posted by mosthost

Of course the quality is low. Plus, there's nothing even remotely normal about a 'network of blogs' made up entirely of 1) aged domains that 2) only post 150-450 word articles on all commercial subjects.

Not only that, there's no social engagement or even a hint of a monetization scheme!

In other words, save your writing of 'high quality content' and submitting it it BMR. It won't help make those blogs any better or 'realer.' Junk is junk.

100% true, a Google employee only has to browse those sites and he'll see immidiatly whats going on. I treat these blog networks from a different perspective though, and that is to use it as long as it works. I try to diversify my links so it won't hit me too hard when a whole network drops.

[nik0]

Originally Posted by hobokook

Like what other sources?

Really? What about:

High PR society
Authority Link Network
Link Authority
Submit Your Article
Unique article Wizard
Web2.0 sites
Bookmarks
Press releases
Doc sharing sites

And the list go's on and on...

[rgb]

yes, the articles need to be better lately to get approved.

what I do, just hire an american on odesk, elance, freelance, a content writer and train them to post on bmr and pay him on approved article.

[BTBAMBB27]

And did he guarantee you approval?
If yes , thats really cheap, show me the way.

Originally Posted by tycoon828

Hello fellow warriors,

I found that somebody bought 100 BMR articles for only $30 on www.freelancer.com

I am curious about how is the quality of those articles? Any experience?


Thanks

[Gene May]

i am agree with you. how can one proved 100 BMR in 30$. then a question is arise that what is the quality of the writer. did you check his/her profile? may be you can get the quality of that writer.

[BigNorm]

I've got a guy writing 50 BMR posts per week for me off O'Desk, 200 per month for $120, but pay him weekly. If he gets 100% acceptance rate then each week I pay him a little bit more which more or less come to $140.00 per month.

So far he's nailed everyone. Probably more than what some people are willing to pay but since it's to help rank sites which make a lot more money, I think it's a small investment.

[The Expert]

Here's one thing that I am always surprised that I don't hear about BMR and other related types of sites such as Linkvana.

How come people don't use Dragon Naturally Speaking on a separate laptop and just talk these blog posts out? It's super-fast, especially if you buy a separate laptop just for this task. You can get a like-new refurbished HP Dual Core 3.0 ghz+ machine on Ebay for $400.

[BigNorm]

I have Dragon Naturally Speaking and outsourcing is way faster. I did use it for a little while but it got annoying having to fix errors all the time. As much as it says it's accent friendly, it's not that friendly.

[cheekugames]

I would like to highly discourage people from using BMR , you want to know why here is the whole thing,
well a friend of mine who is in the same niche as i am suggested me to use BMR , i applied for the membership but my site was rejected for thin content, its a PR 4 site btw, 3 years old, dominating a gaming niche, any ways, my friends site similar to me was accepted in the network, now he just used it and all his keywords have tanked and some got deindexed from google in a matter of few days of using the service, its great that i was saved the trauma by BMR people themselves as they refused my site. So i would highly discourage any one from using it, also i know a lot of mods remove content showing problems with BMR , i do not know whether my comment will be accepted or not but that up to these guys...i will post my review at major forums relating to my niche and other major places so as to give people both sides of the story. My guess is that BMR network has been found out by google and getting punished severely ....

Note- i am not related to any network or promote any service i am just a user who purchases SEO and believes that people must have access to facts, remember "the door swings both ways" ....

Regards

[oscarmike]

they dont typically buy just 100 articles, but 100 approved articles. What buyer's do is give employees access to a writer account, create articles and submit and wait for it to get approved. the articles must be approved before payment is rendered.

Originally Posted by tycoon828

Hello fellow warriors,

I found that somebody bought 100 BMR articles for only $30 on www.freelancer.com

I am curious about how is the quality of those articles? Any experience?


Thanks

[SalAG]

Hi,

I wonder if it's possible to ask the freelancer that any posts rejected by BMR should be revised? Have tried visiting buildmyrankposts.com?

[BigNorm]

When I posted my job on o'Desk, one of the criterias was that any rejected articles had to be revised and submitted and accepted or there wouldn't be payment for that article.

[oscarmike]

Originally Posted by SalAG

Hi,

I wonder if it's possible to ask the freelancer that any posts rejected by BMR should be revised? Have tried visiting buildmyrankposts.com?

yes, but you have to stipulate it in your contract so you have mutual agreement on the revision part.

[shalz15jan]

It's the quality that matters the most. I am sure these articles which are being written at $0.30 per article require a lot of editing.

[JeanneLynn]

Originally Posted by sceptre90

I hired a guy to do 100 bmr post on freelance and I payed 88 dollars, his approval rate ended up being 32 percent, lots of rejects but he got it done

How is that "getting it done?" It sounds like he gave you terrible quality posts and a lot of aggravation.

[smita]

BMR is a link building service that provides high quality back links to your sites. Make back links you write unique posts with your links and submit it into their system.

[Jool]

Hello, I just signed up last week and I'm on my free trial. So far so good. My articles got accepted and published on PR 1 sites. ( the beauty of free trial, I guess, your article will be posted on PR1 sites.)

I have this one article accepted and published, it says PR2 on my dashboard but when I checked the PR its PR1 only but its indexed. So, should I worry about this?

[Jospeh31]

BMR is ok for diversify your links, but I didn't use it for a new site to see how powerful it is. Did anyone do any tests?

Also don't fall below 60% rate or you will have one month to increase the rate above 85%. Otherwise you will get banned.

Originally Posted by GGpaul

I don't mind about "keep writing". I have all the damn time in the world. I also type and think super fast to post an easy 150 words that gets accepted all the time. I will never pay for someone to write these easy articles to post on BMR.

Try to do that for 100 sites.

[777]

I usually get great results from BMR, but one site I've been working on for three weeks has only seen slow downwards movement on the main term and longtail terms. It is not sudden like a google dance as the keywords seem to lose one or two positions a day.

Only previous link building on this site was over six months ago which involved a few directory submissions here and there. Has anyone else experienced this kind of gentle drop? Any thoughts?

[jdooley13]

I started with BMR about 2 weeks ago. 3 days into my trial I found my site on page 24 for my main keyword. Since in 3 months prior it hadn't cracked the top 70 pages, I was excited. 2 days later, it was on page 13 for about 1/2 a day. Then for the next nine days, I couldn't find it at all. Last night it showed up on page 2 and has been there ever since. I am really excited. Hopefully, another couple of weeks of building links and it will be on page one near the top and (even more hopefully) at the top of page one sometime soon.