Build My RanK. BMR

[tycoon828]

Hello fellow warriors,

I found that somebody bought 100 BMR articles for only $30 on www.freelancer.com

I am curious about how is the quality of those articles? Any experience?


Thanks

[Hardik Jogi]

Most of them will require some amount of work from your side to get approved

[chukcha]

They would not be great quality but I would not worry about that because the chance that real human is going to read them is equals to 0. So yeah, don't worry is quantity that matters.

[tycoon828]

Originally Posted by chukcha

They would not be great quality but I would not worry about that because the chance that real human is going to read them is equals to 0. So yeah, don't worry is quantity that matters.

I don't worry about whether they are readable or not. I do worry about whether those articles can get approved by BMR.

[Dmreed4311]

I hired a guy to do 100 bmr post on freelance and I payed 88 dollars, his approval rate ended up being 32 percent, lots of rejects but he got it done

[Rough Outline]

You should check out my thread on how to get extremely cheap BMR posts - click here.

[mytoy78]

Originally Posted by chukcha

They would not be great quality but I would not worry about that because the chance that real human is going to read them is equals to 0. So yeah, don't worry is quantity that matters.

The quality does matter when you are dealing with the 'Build My Rank' network, this is because every post has to be approved by their internal quality control team.

The QC team check for the following:

Uniqueness
Spelling
Grammar
Readability

I've found from my extensive experience in the world of outsourcing 'bmr' posts, that if you pay peanuts - you get monkeys. I'd hazard a guess that 100 posts for $30.00 would have an extremely high 'rejection' rate, which would simply be frustrating for you and a waste of time

[miserman]

Well as per my experience about DP, Warriors , Freelancer and on Odesk, I would say that freelancer and Odesk and quite cheap, the reason is; if you post a job there, you will get many many irrelevant applicants, who are not familiar or experienced about content writing. So i believe that freelancer and odesk type of sites are not providing good quality articles or even writers.

[TopClass]

At $0.4-0.5 a post you definitely shouldn't expect top-notch content, you would obviously have to revise each post before posting otherwise they would get rejected.
Hence it is advisable to hire at least a properly reviewed writer or agency.

[nik0]

I pay $0.40 for each BMR article, approval rate was 100%. Not easy to find but sure not impossible. Must also say that I went through a lot of ads on Freelancer and Odesk and their tiny sales story showed their incapability's of writing a proper article right away. If you can't even get that right :S

[dp40oz]

I have found some really decent writers for around .50 cents a post. 100% acceptance from a few of those writers.

I still don't get how BMR articles are so expensive as you can see from my sig. Before I started outsourcing I was writing about 18-20 in an hour. So at .50 cents an article thats $9-10 an hour, which if you ask me is a decent wage for someone not in the United States who gets to work from home and make their own hours.

I am really surprised people charge so much. BMR posts don't need to be anything decent they just need to make some sort of sense. Some of these writers pretend that its equivalent to writing regular SEO articles which it is not at all. You can just make up stories surrounding the keywords and bust out tons in a day. Theres a huge market for someone who really offers a consistent .50 cent post service.

[martyJames]

I pay 0.40 per article or $40/100 . Quality is ok - look, as long as they are original and have no gramatical or spelling problems they do the job.

[rinor81]

Hey guys,

Been using BMR for a long time and my posts were always accepted with no problem but recently almost any post I publish gets rejected because of sense which means bad grammar, missing words and so on....

The thing is, my post were always good and the same so why now I get rejected almost every time?

Anyone else seen some strict acceptance recently from BMR?

Thanks guys,

[GGpaul]

Originally Posted by rinor81

Hey guys,

Been using BMR for a long time and my posts were always accepted with no problem but recently almost any post I publish gets rejected because of sense which means bad grammar, missing words and so on....

The thing is, my post were always good and the same so why now I get rejected almost every time?

Anyone else seen some strict acceptance recently from BMR?

Thanks guys,

I just logged in to check my queued posts. They're all live now. Two of them posted to PR 2, one PR 4, and one PR 3. 150-170 words and no problems here.

[TBInternetMarketing]

Originally Posted by rinor81

Hey guys,

Been using BMR for a long time and my posts were always accepted with no problem but recently almost any post I publish gets rejected because of sense which means bad grammar, missing words and so on....

The thing is, my post were always good and the same so why now I get rejected almost every time?

Anyone else seen some strict acceptance recently from BMR?

Thanks guys,

It's working fine for me. I'm proud to say I've never had a post rejected.
Also I got a few PR 5 links the other day which was a first time for me.

[dp40oz]

Ive noticed that some of their editors are not the brightest. For example I had a post rejected because the editor didn't realize the word "aid" could mean helping in a financial sense, after 5 rejections it came out that he thought I was referring to the disease.

[rinor81]

Originally Posted by dp40oz

Ive noticed that some of their editors are not the brightest. For example I had a post rejected because the editor didn't realize the word "aid" could mean helping in a financial sense, after 5 rejections it came out that he thought I was referring to the disease.

Oh my...

Still, I don't understand why most of my post now are being rejected when previously they were accepted with no problem, I don't write differently then before...don't get it, frustrating too.

[Seatbelt99]

I just got a subscription to BuildMyRank.com and wondered what's the most effective way to use it.

For each site, does it make sense to have a ton of link options to different areas of my sites, each with it's own keyword (or set of keywords) or do I just have everything go to my main home page, but with several keywords? Or do I just send everything to the same home page using just my primary keyword?

Any tips on how to best use BMR would be most appreciated.

[MSC]

YOu can dispute your rejection, they will point out what you need to fix, though after you fixed, you can get rejected again, in this case file for rejection dispute and your article will be published, if all mistakes has been fixed.

[bhuff85]

I've been with BMR now since around May of last year. Probably had maybe a post or two rejected due to a simple error that I overlooked. Other than that, I have had zero issues (and I write a lot of BMR posts each month).

[LilBlackDress]

Originally Posted by Seatbelt99

I just got a subscription to BuildMyRank.com and wondered what's the most effective way to use it.

For each site, does it make sense to have a ton of link options to different areas of my sites, each with it's own keyword (or set of keywords) or do I just have everything go to my main home page, but with several keywords? Or do I just send everything to the same home page using just my primary keyword?

Any tips on how to best use BMR would be most appreciated.

You should backlink your home page AND your inner pages with different posts on BMR. For each 150 word post you are allowed one link.

Use the keyword you want the page to be known for as your anchor text and mix it in with related keywords.

So if you want your home page to be know for keywordA, then backlink using keywordA as anchor text. Use words related to keywordA to mix things up.

If you are trying to rank your inner page for keywordB, then backlink to inner page using KeywordB as anchor text. And mix it up a bit with related keywords.

You are allowed 10 posts per day per site.

Hope that helps.

[rinor81]

Originally Posted by bhuff85

I've been with BMR now since around May of last year. Probably had maybe a post or two rejected due to a simple error that I overlooked. Other than that, I have had zero issues (and I write a lot of BMR posts each month).

I'll try to ask what's the problem, there were times where I've fixed and it got approved and times it got rejected after I fixed as you mentioned. I hope they say what to fix if you dispute the rejection.

Originally Posted by MSC

YOu can dispute your rejection, they will point out what you need to fix, though after you fixed, you can get rejected again, in this case file for rejection dispute and your article will be published, if all mistakes has been fixed.

I've been posting too for a long time and never had so many rejections up until now and I write the same as before, so I don't understand what has changed...

[Studio13]

That place is DAMN strict on their unique content policy too I might add...

Somewhat to my dismay.

I typed up 5 100% unique article out of my own head, and they only approved 3 of them. Apparently, someone thinks like I do and published their thoughts first...

So now, I write using wild-ass words that no one would use, sometimes greek and use strange bullet-point and listing strategies to hopefully bypass whatever DubCop or Copyscape rules they are enlisting.

[LilBlackDress]

The secret to writing fast and effective BMR posts is to write the way you talk. If you are sharing about the latest acne cream for example, you can write something like...

My cousin Jane is trying ProductAcneCreamX and she is hoping it will work for her. Her skin is not that great and....

If you write conversationally, it keeps it simple and goes quickly.

Using a speech to text tool, like Dragon Naturally Speaking can bump up your output quite a bit also.

I have never had problems getting any posts approved. So long as you write original content and make sure it is free of errors you should be good to go.

[Studio13]

Originally Posted by LilBlackDress

The secret to writing fast and effective BMR posts is to write the way you talk. If you are sharing about the latest acne cream for example, you can write something like...

My cousin Jane is trying ProductAcneCreamX and she is hoping it will work for her. Her skin is not that great and....

If you write conversationally, it keeps it simple and goes quickly.

Using a speech to text tool, like Dragon Naturally Speaking can bump up your output quite a bit also.

I have never had problems getting any posts approved. So long as you write original content and make sure it is free of errors you should be good to go.

Great tip with the voice-to-text dictation software — forgot this option even existed. Sadly, I just priced it out and Nuance's "Dragon Naturally Speaking" software for mac is $199 — out of my budget at the moment. Any known alternatives?

[AhmedA]

Never had a problem with BMR, I've been using them for a long time with 100% approval. However you can dispute the rejection.

Regards,
Ahmed

[dchen88]

I never had a rejection that wasn't unwarranted. A lot of the rejections that I did have I noticed that there was an egregious error that was easily fixed.

[jdooley13]

That is by far the hardest part of BMR...coming up with unique posts. There is only so many times you can write something unique about the same subject, especially when you are trying to work in the same keyword multiple times.

[Mosa]

Just use Dragon Naturally Speaking and have one page open for writing your article and another page open for researching and rewording what you're reading. After you're done, then check the articles for uniqueness using Copyscape - i've also used Plagium. I can write 8 - 10 articles in an hour using this method.

[bulldogzg]

Well like everyone said - BMR is very strict when it comes to approving your posts. Worst then ezine. However once you figure how to write them you can get a lot of advantage with your subscription.
Target your inner pages as well as the home page while playing with your KW's. Also make sure you take advantage of 150 words per link system. More KW's you have in your article the more links you get (and easier you get approved).

Ofc., if you're not feeling up to it you can always outsource your posts - like 1$ per link (150 words) if you search for it a bit.

[Bryan V]

Originally Posted by rinor81

Oh my...

Still, I don't understand why most of my post now are being rejected when previously they were accepted with no problem, I don't write differently then before...don't get it, frustrating too.

They have been tightening up the quality requirements for the past few months. Even the littlest of things can get it rejected.

No offense, but if your posts have errors like in the bolded quote above, it may be the reason they are getting rejected.

[Seatbelt99]

Thanks everyone for the tips. Hopefully it will work out well for me.

I've got my VA doing the posts for $1 per so that's no work for me.

[yukon]

Originally Posted by dp40oz

Ive noticed that some of their editors are not the brightest. For example I had a post rejected because the editor didn't realize the word "aid" could mean helping in a financial sense, after 5 rejections it came out that he thought I was referring to the disease.

That editor is probably earning $1.47 per day.

[JeanneLynn]

Sometimes a post may get rejected if the words are too fancy or technical.

[UMS]

Originally Posted by rinor81

Hey guys,

Been using BMR for a long time and my posts were always accepted with no problem but recently almost any post I publish gets rejected because of sense which means bad grammar, missing words and so on....

The thing is, my post were always good and the same so why now I get rejected almost every time?

Anyone else seen some strict acceptance recently from BMR?

No offence, but if I was a BMR editor and saw a post like the one above, I'd reject it due to bad grammar.

[UMS]

Originally Posted by JeanneLynn

Sometimes a post may get rejected if the words are too fancy or technical.

I was reading something yesterday (unfortunately I can't remember the source) that said BMR accept rates were improved by keeping the words and sentences short and simple.

[razorhound]

It's working fine as usual.

[TBInternetMarketing]

Originally Posted by Seatbelt99

I just got a subscription to BuildMyRank.com and wondered what's the most effective way to use it.

For each site, does it make sense to have a ton of link options to different areas of my sites, each with it's own keyword (or set of keywords) or do I just have everything go to my main home page, but with several keywords? Or do I just send everything to the same home page using just my primary keyword?

Any tips on how to best use BMR would be most appreciated.

I use BMR and build between 1-3 links per day to each webpage. I mainly focus on my homepage, but if you want you can target your inner pages as well if you have the time.
Honestly, I don't think you need much more than 3 links a day because these links are pretty powerful. If you have the time, then great, but don't overdo it. Works great for me.

[rinor81]

Originally Posted by UMS

No offence, but if I was a BMR editor and saw a post like the one above, I'd reject it due to bad grammar.

That's fine, I saw the mistake there and it's because I wrote fast. After I fixed some of them, they got approved but still never had problems before.

Originally Posted by Bryan V

They have been tightening up the quality requirements for the past few months. Even the littlest of things can get it rejected.

No offense, but if your posts have errors like in the bolded quote above, it may be the reason they are getting rejected.

Maybe that's my answer, short sentences.

[satrap]

I think once you get a few rejected posts, they may keep a closer eye on you.

I actually am thankful for them taking this seriously. Not only it helps keep the quality of the content in their network high, it also has another great benefit for people like me who are not good at writing in English (English isn't my mother tongue and I never learned formally to write or to speak in English).

I used to get lots of rejections, but after asking so many times about the reasons for rejections, I have learned so many new things about writing in English that I haven't had a single rejection for the past 300-400 posts that I submitted. So, I have seen an improvement in my writing skill.

[SAmarket]

I have 432 posts distributed over the last 30 days.

I only had one rejected as I forgot to check the spelling!

If you write with decent grammar and spelling then you should have no problems.

[rinor81]

Originally Posted by satrap

I think once you get a few rejected posts, they may keep a closer eye on you.

I actually am thankful for them taking this seriously. Not only it helps keep the quality of the content in their network high, it also has another great benefit for people like me who are not good at writing in English (English isn't my mother tongue and I never learned formally to write or to speak in English).

I used to get lots of rejections, but after asking so many times about the reasons for rejections, I have learned so many new things about writing in English that I haven't had a single rejection for the past 300-400 posts that I submitted. So, I have seen an improvement in my writing skill.

I think they are more strict now because I never had so many rejections before and I've been using BMR for a long time now. Anyhow I'm glad you don't get rejected anymore, I'll try to write short and to the point I guess...so far a few of my fixes were approved.

[hotwebwords]

Originally Posted by dp40oz

I am really surprised people charge so much. BMR posts don't need to be anything decent they just need to make some sort of sense. Some of these writers pretend that its equivalent to writing regular SEO articles which it is not at all. You can just make up stories surrounding the keywords and bust out tons in a day. Theres a huge market for someone who really offers a consistent .50 cent post service.

Does everyone feel like BMR articles can be utter garbage? I'm just curious, because I am wondering if everyone is completely okay with trashing the internet with nonsense.

Anyone ever think that if we just overrun the internet with crap people will give up on it and just fling poo at each other like monkeys?

Okay, so that last part was a joke, but come on guys, if you want BMR to keep working for as long as possible, why not present something that is worth reading? Is that such a travesty?

[discustipated]

I write fast and I'm inpatient when it comes to back linking or writing content for seo purpose if it is a niche a have no interest in. But every post I have submitted to BMR was just filler and i have never been rejected. It's not as complicated as most think. If your getting rejected, you have to be a ****ty writer. Hope this helps!

Casey

[outwest]

How long are these "articles" that you are submitting to BMR?

[discustipated]

Originally Posted by mytoy78

The quality does matter when you are dealing with the 'Build My Rank' network, this is because every post has to be approved by their internal quality control team.

The QC team check for the following:

Uniqueness
Spelling
Grammar
Readability

I've found from my extensive experience in the world of outsourcing 'bmr' posts, that if you pay peanuts - you get monkeys. I'd hazard a guess that 100 posts for $30.00 would have an extremely high 'rejection' rate, which would simply be frustrating for you and a waste of time

Exactly, If you hire them they will do there job and get paid. It's not like the client you working with and not legit contract anyways. you have to open up and and explain every last detail to have something done right. That goes for any thing or company though.

[outwest]

How long are they supposed to be to be accepted?

[M Thompson]

Originally Posted by outwest

How long are they supposed to be to be accepted?

At least 150 words

[outwest]

What are the requirements other than readability, spelling errors (none)
and general flow?

[outsync]

As more unique article is - more chances to get approved...