Google Sniper - Who's got an opinion?

[thatkeywordguy]

The course is a bit old now, but I was wondering how it fared post-panda?

Thoughts?

[thatkeywordguy]

here is a link to the page

it was a pretty popular course

George Brown's Google Sniper 2.0 - Official Site

[Brader]

Thanks for your share Mate

[Brendan Mace]

I have a very strong opinion. Google sniper 2 has literally changed my life. Of all the courses I invested in, it was the one course that finally taught me how to make it online. The sniper site model is so easy - and it works. You learn how to build a site in a couple hours, that can maintain a passive income forever.

Because of the massive influx of new websites and content, it's not as easy to get traffic to sniper sites. You can still make a killing using the knowledge in the course. But if you want to make even more money, it's smart to combine the course with a little bit of SEO.

Highly recommended. If you're interested, I have a free report of Google sniper 2.0 in my sig.

[thatkeywordguy]

hmm well thats not exactly an unsolicited testimonial...

But i'll take your word for it.

Ya particularly I am wondering how it has fared when compared to the last 12 months or so - e.g. with Panda, and "doorway pages" and google cracking down on lite websites...

[Brendan Mace]

Originally Posted by thatkeywordguy

hmm well thats not exactly an unsolicited testimonial...

But i'll take your word for it.

Ya particularly I am wondering how it has fared when compared to the last 12 months or so - e.g. with Panda, and "doorway pages" and google cracking down on lite websites...

Yeah, I'm promoting Google Sniper 2.0. But I'm promoting it because of the success I've had from it. I used it to build amazon affiliate type sites that still make good income to this day.

The one thing that has changed majorly from the release, is that it's no longer as easy to get traffic as it was when the course was created. So it won't be the end of your education. <--- If you want to make the real big bucks.

It was and IS still a great place to start. You'll get some money rolling in. And once it's set up, you should then learn more about traffic generation.

[Batou]

co2 i opted in on your site but didn't get a link to the report, do you have a direct link? Also how do your niche sites get ranked without major seo?

[Brendan Mace]

Originally Posted by Batou

co2 i opted in on your site but didn't get a link to the report, do you have a direct link? Also how do your niche sites get ranked without major seo?

The free report should be sent to your email. My sites DO get ranked with SEO. If you want to PM me, I can give you more specifics about how I rank my websites.

When Google Sniper 2 was created, there wasn't any need for additional SEO. Now the internet is more competitive and you need to do at least a little to get some good traffic. You will still get some traffic and sales without any SEO. But if you want to make good money, you need to compliment the Google Sniper 2 system with some good SEO methods.

[neil_patmore]

3 page EMD thin affiliate sites are long dead.

When Google Sniper 2 was created, there wasn't any need for additional SEO.

Seriously, are you for real?

When the original Google Sniper was released it was brilliant and people were seeing real results. But Google Sniper 2 was ****. Nothing but a rehashed attempt at squeezing a bit more profit out of the original course!

[Brendan Mace]

Originally Posted by neil_patmore

3 page EMD thin affiliate sites are long dead.


Seriously, are you for real?

When the original Google Sniper was released it was brilliant and people were seeing real results. But Google Sniper 2 was ****. Nothing but a rehashed attempt at squeezing a bit more profit out of the original course!

I am VERY real. Thin affiliate sites dead???

Please...

Your post suggests that

1. the original course was brilliant
2. the second course was identical to the original
3. the second course is garbage.

That really doesn't make any logical sense whatsoever. If the Google Sniper 2.0 is like the original, then it should be effective, right?

I agree that Google Sniper 2.0 is not that much different than the original Google sniper course. And perhaps "rehashed" is an appropriate criticism. The original was brilliant, and so is the second one.

5-10 page sites are stronger than they were before the panda update. The panda algorithm is more likely to attack "content farms" like article directories with thousands of spun garbage.

If you have a small site with relatively decent unique content, you can make an absolute killing right now.

[Droopy Dawg]

Here's the GS2 thread from the "Reviews" board. You want unsolicited? Here ya go..

Google Sniper 2.0

[thatkeywordguy]

Hmm thanks

Some interesting reviews there... It's funny how the EMD approach wasn't specified too much by George from what I can tell...

[WarriorLady]

Did you know that the price for Google Sniper is $47 A MONTH, not just a one-time fee of $47? Imagine my surprise when I went to purchase a copy just to see that Click-Bank was going to charge me almost $50 a month for a pre-Panda niche making system! It certainly needs more than a Panda upgrade to earn a $50 monthly subscription!

[dsbusiness23]

Unbiased review of Google Sniper? hmm that will be hard to find. I'll be honest yes I promote it to this day, and yes I do think it is a good course. However, I highly recommend Matt Carter's Rapid Profit Formula over it. Google Sniper is a good course, especially if you are completely new to IM, but the fact is that, as has been mentioned it's outdated. Anyone who is not completely new to internet marketing will most likely know everything that Google Sniper teaches.

Google Sniper does teach the good strategy of setting up a well SEO'd page and setting up the plugins and post scheduling so that your content is added to over time. Sniper sites do work. Yes I still see them ranking all the time, but creating authority sites and focusing on the long term is far more effective. In fact if I have one word of advice that reigns above everything else. It would be to focus your online business around long term results.

To your success

[xxxJamesxxx]

Since Panda, GS 2 is a really outdated course. Like dsbusiness23 said above me, go with Rapid Profit Formula. It's just been updated to make it Panda friendly.

James Scholes

[jokee]

i think Google sniper good ..

[bnetwork]

More people should build GS sites. Less competition for real monies that way.

[RayW]

GSniper sucks. The whole course can basically be summed up in one line: build lots of micro-niche sites rather than one big site. This idea is all over the IM community, it's not anything new. Would you really want to pay $47 for that?

[Fixers]

It's not too bad for someone new to IM but one problem is that it overrates EMDs and the sites are made too thin IMO. It gives you some basics but if you read on forums you will probably learn more.

[xxxJamesxxx]

It's not too bad for someone new to IM but one problem is that it overrates EMDs and the sites are made too thin IMO. It gives you some basics but if you read on forums you will probably learn more.

The reason why he over rates them is because the course is actually from 2009 and it did work well then.

When he brought out 2.0, it was the exact same course as the original except for a new outsourcing module.

James Scholes

[thatkeywordguy]

2009. hmm...

[Curtis2011]

Originally Posted by co2

Yeah, I'm promoting Google Sniper 2.0. But I'm promoting it because of the success I've had from it. I used it to build amazon affiliate type sites that still make good income to this day.

The one thing that has changed majorly from the release, is that it's no longer as easy to get traffic as it was when the course was created. So it won't be the end of your education. <--- If you want to make the real big bucks.

It was and IS still a great place to start. You'll get some money rolling in. And once it's set up, you should then learn more about traffic generation.

You still haven't said how much success you've actually had with it.

Could you give us a monthly earnings or visitor number that you have achieved, and how many Sniper sites it took to achieve that?

[Brendan Mace]

Originally Posted by Curtis2011

You still haven't said how much success you've actually had with it.

Could you give us a monthly earnings or visitor number that you have achieved, and how many Sniper sites it took to achieve that?

It's pretty impossible to determine really. I used the knowledge from Google sniper 2.0 to help build my amazon sites. Since taking the course, I've moved away from sniper type sites. I still have the sites I created rolling in passive income.

In december, I earned over 5,000 dollars from amazon associates and over 450 dollars from adsense.

Sniper sites are a great place to start. They can roll in a decent amount of passive income and they are a great learning experience. Eventually, you'll probably want to move on to bigger and better things. But as a starting point, I LOVED making sniper sites.

I'm not really sure how knowing my sniper site earnings will help you "make money online."

It's fairly obvious that it's possible to make good money with this type of system. You just need to learn "how" and then TAKE ACTION.

[Curtis2011]

Originally Posted by co2

It's pretty impossible to determine really. I used the knowledge from Google sniper 2.0 to help build my amazon sites. Since taking the course, I've moved away from sniper type sites. I still have the sites I created rolling in passive income.

In december, I earned over 5,000 dollars from amazon associates and over 450 dollars from adsense.

Sniper sites are a great place to start. They can roll in a decent amount of passive income and they are a great learning experience. Eventually, you'll probably want to move on to bigger and better things. But as a starting point, I LOVED making sniper sites.

I'm not really sure how knowing my sniper site earnings will help you "make money online."

It's fairly obvious that it's possible to make good money with this type of system. You just need to learn "how" and then TAKE ACTION.

I was just asking because sometimes people will leave reviews like "the program is great!!!" because they enjoyed reading/watching it, but they never actually use the techniques so they don't know if they work or not.

But thanks for the response. It helps to know that a review is coming from someone with real experience earning money online rather than a "would-be" internet marketer like a lot of beginners are.

[smodha]

Originally Posted by co2

I have a very strong opinion. Google sniper 2 has literally changed my life. Of all the courses I invested in, it was the one course that finally taught me how to make it online. The sniper site model is so easy - and it works. You learn how to build a site in a couple hours, that can maintain a passive income forever.

Because of the massive influx of new websites and content, it's not as easy to get traffic to sniper sites. You can still make a killing using the knowledge in the course. But if you want to make even more money, it's smart to combine the course with a little bit of SEO.

Highly recommended. If you're interested, I have a free report of Google sniper 2.0 in my sig.

Hi co2. Can you PM your email address? I wanted to get some advice off you regarding GS2. I don't have enough posts to PM you. Thanks.

[lordkensal]

I think the core of Google Sniper 2 is still sound - and a great intro for newbies. I made my first affiliate sales after using Google Sniper. BUT, yes, in 2012 - if you stick to exactly what is outlined in Google Sniper and nothing else, then you will struggle. BUT, if you build the sites out a bit more, do a bit more off page SEO *(basically adapt to the requirements of a post Google Panda world) - then they still work, they just need to be a bit more robust. As a first step into affiliate marketing it is a good introduction - but in 2012, you need to do more. That said, I also think Rapid Profit Formula and Unstoppable Affiliate are more Panda friendly.