![]() | ![]() | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Reviewer Monster Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 648
Thanks: 30
Thanked 64 Times in 62 Posts
|
I always seen many of the guys written not more than 20% money keywords to be in article .. so what was the 80% left and you can calculate these keywords, is this called a density ? anchor diversity |
| | |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Pageranker War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Holland
Posts: 4,144
Thanks: 503
Thanked 538 Times in 448 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Professional Wannabe War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: UK
Posts: 1,014
Thanks: 17
Thanked 129 Times in 107 Posts
| Quote:
Hopefully I've understood you wrong | |
| | ||
| | |
| | #4 |
| Reviewer Monster Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 648
Thanks: 30
Thanked 64 Times in 62 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Advanced Warrior Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 893
Thanks: 12
Thanked 108 Times in 98 Posts
|
If I am reading this right.. think you are confusing 2 different terms
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Reviewer Monster Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 648
Thanks: 30
Thanked 64 Times in 62 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Professional Wannabe War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: UK
Posts: 1,014
Thanks: 17
Thanked 129 Times in 107 Posts
|
So you mean the anchor texts when building links? The other 80% could be secondary long tail keyword, "click here", random names, whatever. Chill out with some of the numbers people throw around these forums though, nothing is set in stone. Anchor diversity is thought to make backlinks look more natural but no one can know for sure what the optimum ratios are without EXTENSIVE testing
|
| | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Cannes - France
Posts: 178
Thanks: 4
Thanked 39 Times in 21 Posts
|
The important thing is not to use the same keyword for all your backlinks. I use ~30-35% my main keyword, ~30-35% some LSI keywords (related keywords) and very important: 30% general keywords like: more info, click here, all the details... to make your backlink pattern look more natural.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Plundering the Web War Room Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: , , .
Posts: 6,373
Thanks: 1,184
Thanked 1,802 Times in 1,291 Posts
| Quote:
What has the WF come to? This? Seriously. You people misquote google and it goes viral. Google never said anything about anchor diversity. Anchor diversity will not help if you keep looking under the same rocks for links. And if you are not, then anchor diversity is a moot point. It's just people's way of saying they can get around what google really says. If anchor diversity mattered, everybody would make one post here with a sig link and never post again. It's not about anchor diversity. It's about getting good links. 100% of your links should be good ones. Paul | |
|
Beware, your SEO guru might be catfishing.
| ||
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,621
Thanks: 41
Thanked 488 Times in 290 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Dynamic SEO War Room Member |
Take all your diversity percentages, divide them by 3.14, round that number up to the next whole number, then throw it in the trash. Why would anyone want to rank for the anchor-text click here? |
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 20%, anchor, text |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |