Angela's list

[Radix]

I got it.


If you're not getting this and you're building your empire the right way, you need this.

Thanks Angela.

[FrontpageContent]

I got the March list rather late in the month (joined at that time) and I found several of the sites changed their policies and it was no longer possible to link from them - maybe because Angelas list is too popular?

I kept my subscription though, she has some good stuff

Kim

[pj413]

Angela's backlinks are top notch, if you want to rank high organically in the search engines; you have to get her WSO. When I first started marketing I tried her backlink packet, and it literally increased my ranking in Google over night. Not to mention that her packets only cost $5 a month.

[reapr]

Her packet is a sdeal.

[FrontpageContent]

You can find her WSO here:

http://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-...inks-free.html

[Oling]

Angela's list is a list of sites with high PR where you can use for backlinking so you can get to the top spot of the SERP

Oling

[discrat]

Originally Posted by pj413

Angela's backlinks are top notch, if you want to rank high organically in the search engines; you have to get her WSO. When I first started marketing I tried her backlink packet, and it literally increased my ranking in Google over night. Not to mention that her packets only cost $5 a month.

Same with me, I started getting Ranked with Keywords I thought I would never get ranked for. It was within just a few weeks after getting Angelas Packet.

[JonathanR]

The list is getting popular. Most of them do work, but sometimes you see things like this:

This function has been temporarily DISABLED by the site admin because too many people
are trying to register so they can post illegal ad links in our forums.

[cookies]

Angela's list is a great resource...you can't beat the price!

[Netcel]

I use it and find it spot on

[kingjenson]

I think the program is bogus

[BenjaminGates]

Somewhere else in a different post there were doubts raised about these links. If google does not count all these links then it will be a problem.

[Amenda Jessera]

Yes, I do agree with you all. Angela's link list really rocks. But some extra work too needed to feel the changes in SERP

[marketseeker]

Originally Posted by kingjenson

I think the program is bogus

Bogus? is it just possible that you are bogus? Internet marketing is not for everyone, maybe it's time to go back to 7-11, just constructive critique

[TomBond]

There are far better ways of buidling links than Angela's packets. The vast majority of her links NEVER get seen by search engines so are completly worthless.

Although its only $5, the amount of time it takes to complete a packet means they don't return a satisfactory ROI in my eyes.

[marketseeker]

Originally Posted by distinctly_digital

There are far better ways of buidling links than Angela's packets. The vast majority of her links NEVER get seen by search engines so are completly worthless.

Although its only $5, the amount of time it takes to complete a packet means they don't return a satisfactory ROI in my eyes.

That is simply because you don't know how to use them, plain and simple. The term 'better' has many definitions. Do you mean better by, better programs or easier ways? how do you define better. If you use the packets like most and just go create a sig file and leave then you are not taking advantage of the advanced possibilities so there are "better ways" If you follow the heard and do the same thing they do then you get the lame results but if you do your own thing, "providing you can think for yourself" then you get better results. The pages she provides are a great work reducer for me and for $ bucks it's very valuable and I get "better" results than I do from other sources and I use them all.
On ROI I won't give my procedure out but it's not hard to figure out. I created a site in about half an hour based on Johns adsense book that I had to buy after reading his post. It was indexed in about 5 minutes and ranked on the first page for the keyword I am targeting. It stayed there for two days and then did the dance. I had someone do the packet for me last month and all but two worked, I bookmarked them and then went back with the list form my worker and did my thing. 3 days later the site came back and is making steady money everyday. I figure I have less (and I'm guessing high) than $100 into this with my time being $25 an hour mabey a little more in time. But my point is that it's now making steady money so my roi gets better everyday. These terms flying around are all relative and shouldn't be used in a general way.

[Jeremy123]

the backlinks do work, but because so many people visit the sites
at the same time, the webmaster usually takes away the edit profile link feature

[KenThompson]

Would anyone care to estimate the percentage of monthly links that
become unavailable due to overuse?

Thanks.

[nofearman]

Originally Posted by distinctly_digital

There are far better ways of buidling links than Angela's packets. The vast majority of her links NEVER get seen by search engines so are completly worthless.

Although its only $5, the amount of time it takes to complete a packet means they don't return a satisfactory ROI in my eyes.

You have a lot to learn, . . BUT PLEASE, DON'T USE THEM!! Meanwhile, I WON'T see YOU at the TOP of page 1.

[TristanPerry]

Originally Posted by KenThompson

Would anyone care to estimate the percentage of monthly links that
become unavailable due to overuse?

Thanks.

I bought Angela's links mid-way through last month. So had the August one on the 15th. I then did the September ones a couple of days ago.

Both times there were 3 (out of the 30 total) which were unavailable.

So I'd guess (from my albeit limited experience) that it's 10% become unavailable.

[kkchoon]

I would collect as much High PR backlinks as I can, I don't really are about the 10% losses

[Shaun Lee]

Angela's links are awesome (step-by-step, anyone?), but there is one problem. 30 per month is too little. I'm doing 10 per day, so I have to constantly search for more links myself.

[KevinA]

I just subscribed for the link packets .. $5 is chips if its really as good as every1 says. Hopefully it gives my site a boost from no.3 towards the tops spot, will keep you all posted.

[Sandra Ken]

With so many people talking about her list, it's gotta be very helpful. Everywhere I go here I find people saying one thing or another about it. But what about the problems they say the list is having these days?

[TomBond]

Originally Posted by marketseeker

That is simply because you don't know how to use them, plain and simple. The term 'better' has many definitions. Do you mean better by, better programs or easier ways? how do you define better. If you use the packets like most and just go create a sig file and leave then you are not taking advantage of the advanced possibilities so there are "better ways" If you follow the heard and do the same thing they do then you get the lame results but if you do your own thing, "providing you can think for yourself" then you get better results. The pages she provides are a great work reducer for me and for $ bucks it's very valuable and I get "better" results than I do from other sources and I use them all.
On ROI I won't give my procedure out but it's not hard to figure out. I created a site in about half an hour based on Johns adsense book that I had to buy after reading his post. It was indexed in about 5 minutes and ranked on the first page for the keyword I am targeting. It stayed there for two days and then did the dance. I had someone do the packet for me last month and all but two worked, I bookmarked them and then went back with the list form my worker and did my thing. 3 days later the site came back and is making steady money everyday. I figure I have less (and I'm guessing high) than $100 into this with my time being $25 an hour mabey a little more in time. But my point is that it's now making steady money so my roi gets better everyday. These terms flying around are all relative and shouldn't be used in a general way.

The better way I was referring to is dofollow blog commenting. I can easily sources hundred of high page rank PAGES (not domains) to leave my links on for free. These links stay around for longer than Angela's, carry significantly more weight in algorythms, and are much quicker to process, therefore in my eyes, they are 'better'

I'm not arguing with you, or slating Angela just imparting advice to novice warriors based on my own personal experience using Angelas links.

[sherone]

How can I buy this packet?? where should I register for that?

[TristanPerry]

Originally Posted by sherone

How can I buy this packet?? where should I register for that?

The fifth post in this thread answers your question

[VladWorks]

I couldn't be happier with my link packs from Angela. I use them for all my sites and my customers websites too.

I outsource the labor so its quite hassle free. I pay my crew around $15 for all 30 sites and I put around 2-3 links in each profile. It works real well.

I have no complaints about Angela or Paul. Except we could use more links!!!

[miikweb]

It'a a great method

[HCLee]

I have used about 4 of Angela's link packets and I've seen great results. But when I used them on my niche sites my SERP increased even more dramatically because the competition is lesser.

[Sixer]

i never use it yet but i think i should check Angela`s back links

[yongchea]

I already used two packages and still waiting to see the impact. Normally how long it will take to see the results.

[pj413]

Originally Posted by yongchea

I already used two packages and still waiting to see the impact. Normally how long it will take to see the results.

This most depends on your choice of keywords.

[Zeus66]

I actually hope a lot of people hesitate and don't use Angela's (and Paul's) links packets. "The less, the merrier" in my selfish view.

I've used all of Angela's and many of Paul's links and yes, some get axed fast, some get axed a bit later on, and many from a year ago that I set up are still in place. The majority for sure.

Do they work? Oh yes, they most definitely work! The better your keyword choice, the more impactful these links are. If you choose a highly competitive term, of course it will take many months and a lot of these kinds of links to crack the Top 10. But virtually every niche has many lower competition keywords that these links will work wonders on.

To the doubters: Those of us who have used these links for a year or more now know they work. It's not theory or opinion. It's verifiable fact. So believe what you will. We don't mind a bit.

John

[macfamous]

where is itt .. need example of angelas list?

[dswift33]

I have a subscription and it's ok. It seems to take a while for the links to be recognized by Google if at all. A forum profile is not exactly content rich.

The thing I notice is that the day the list is released the forums get inundated with new registrations. This immediately tips of the forum admin which in some cases leads them to shut down registrations. So it's almost like a race to create your profiles before they get shut down.

Google and forum admins are getting wise to this now. Now's there's a website that targets these type of linkbuilders: stopforumspam.com

It is basically a blacklist of emails provided for forum admins. You can search and see if your email account is in there.

[kkchoon]

Is Profile Links Still Working

Yes, and I believe it will work for a long time! Counter spam will always be there, however, you can counter the counter spam as well!

Try to register a new domain just for email creation, I do that for all high PR sites.

Register new account, don't put any links, wait for 7 to 14 days and let it submerge from the main page, then go back and place a link later. If I remember this correctly, Terry Kyle call it a double pass method.

Will Profile Links Last?

Many would argue about Google will catch up .... bla, bla, bla...

We all know work with Google is the best way - pure white hat backlink. However, marketer always know the way to piggy back into the "trust" system of Google, that's where the Gray and Black hat come into place.

Google is smart, so I would prefer to build my authority site with proper white hat method, but always love to jump start it fast by using Gray hat style of backlinks - authority profile links!

Authority profile link provided by Angela & Paul and many Warriors here (including me) will always work, at least for a long time!

Google will not drop these method, however, I think they will implement some kind of filter to disregards many of those links, look for spam pattern and try to degrade the site if they found any...

This can be easily avoided from experience and experiments, Google won't stop trusting those authority sites, because Google's algorithm is basically - link, trust and filter.

Can I Rely Solely on Profile Links?

As much as I hate to admit, NO - you should get as much variety of links as possible. Pure profile links might work today, when Google add filter to it, one of the rule might be looking for wide variety of link types...

So you should get as much links, as well as more link types.

Kok Choon