Tools for creating Web 2.0s for tier 1 and 2

by nf2458
10 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hey there I will be manually creating web 2.0s for tier one but I want my tier 2 links to be web 2.0s aswell. Which do you think is best for creating lots of decent web 2.0s for tier 2 or maybe even tier 1. Fcs networker, ultimate demon, or the linkjuicer?
#20s #creating #link building #tier #tools #web
  • Profile picture of the author writeaway
    I'd stay away from this linkbuilding method if I were you. Thanks to Penguin's rapid evolution, this no longer works as well as it did previously. Maybe the better way to build backlinks is to find your competition's broken links and use outreach to replace those links. Here's a guide on how to do it (not my site) How to Use Broken Links to Build Backlinks | Marketing Bees
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9122686].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nf2458
      Thanks for the heads up but I also forgot to mention that I was going to use this method for a youtube video. I've ranked youtube videos before that are still ranked on google with little to no web 2.0s so I thought this web 2.0 method would be an extreme boost for new video campaigns. Any ways thanks I will try that out and do you have any other better link building methods that I can try out too?
      Signature
      If you are not willing to risk the usual, you will have to settle for the ordinary
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9122948].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nf2458
      so even if I dont use that specific web 2.0 method, which do you think is better for web 2.0s thelinkjuicer, ultimate demon, or fcs networker. I already have gsa ser but I get very little web 2s with gsa that are very low quality.
      Signature
      If you are not willing to risk the usual, you will have to settle for the ordinary
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9122955].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author DiggitySEO
        FCS all the way. Great support. Clean interface. No need for VPS or proxies.
        Signature
        ..:: High PR Backlinks for Sale | 100% Safe | Over 2000 Orders ::..
        Email orders@diggitymarketing.com for more information.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9123158].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author deepakrajput
    You should prefer manual way for creating Web 2.0 tier 2 also. If you want to make your site or Brand name away from Google Penalize because If you use SEO Tools Google will track them not now but after some time.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9123442].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nf2458
      I am just using this for a youtube video so I think manually building the web 2.0s for tier one should be enough. Dont get me wrong I will still make sure the web 2s created with fcs networker are not crap.
      Signature
      If you are not willing to risk the usual, you will have to settle for the ordinary
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9123560].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Cerf
    Use social bookmarks. Either manually, which is too much work, or there are many cheap services for hundreds of bookmarks. They still carry some value for tier 2 and 3.
    Signature

    I will create 5 Quality WEB 2.0 Sites for $ 5

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9123642].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author himanuzo
    For tier #1, you manually to build the web 2.0 properties. Then for tier #2, you use SE Nuke or GSA SER in generating backlinks toward to the web 2.0 properties which are in the tier #1.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9126635].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cratos
    FCS Networker and Ultimate Demon are both some great SEO tools to use for building your tier one links instead of going about it manually.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9209939].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author creaturelocaljohn
    I would rather manually create branded links on tier 1 then just use web 2.0 on tier 2 and tier 3 are for other type of links (bookmark, wiki, forum and etc.)

    I have used UD before and it's pretty easy to use.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9211995].message }}

Trending Topics