![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Internet Warrior! War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: London, United Kingdom.
Posts: 263
Thanks: 69
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
Hi all, Much apperciated if I can get some good honest feedback as to potency of salesletter on this site: Internet Millionaire System - Internet Millionaire System! The bonus section needs a bit trimming so it is about 90% complete.] But to you guys who know the fine art of Direct Response Copy, What do you think? Does it look persuasive and compelling OR it needs a little polish or lot of polish to get it to stage that it is high class. Thanks in advance fro your critique. Before I hand it over to the graphics man to revamp the graphics anjd layout, I though best if I can get critique. Smak |
| | |
| | #2 |
| I.C.Hope War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,515
Thanks: 446
Thanked 227 Times in 181 Posts
|
It's not effortless for change. I'm impressed with that (your honesty) but I don't think the headline is very compelling to an unkowing audience so if it's blind traffic I wouldn't be so sure it will convert. It's the figures. Millions Versus $17,987k per month, that kind of thing. Copy My Internet Millionaire System That Generates $42,987+ Per Month...Even If You've Never Made A Sale Online Before!" Although if you've been building a relationship with your clients/soon to be clients then I suppose the headline will prove you good. Though from my angle it's a page I would close in an instant unless I already knew and trusted you, even though I really do want to Discover an Internet Millionaire System I could put on steriods. Then there's that massive claim followed by a feeble image of some sort of check/account. Surely an Internet Millionaire would post picutres of his massive house, private plane or massive office block? I also think if you want to get the best critique you need to state how the traffic is being directed to the page. Best of Luck with Your Venture. Mark |
|
I want a good keyword researcher, not for min sites but for tech articles. Hit me up if you've got those skillz!
| |
| | |
| | #3 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 170
Blog Entries: 9 Thanks: 16
Thanked 60 Times in 38 Posts
|
In my opinion, I would lose the Lamborghini asap. I swear, I've seen that damn cash-spurting Lambo so many times it means nothing to me by now. I'm certainly not in awe of it. I'd move the "big box product" image further down the page - at least until you've had a chance to explain because at the moment I feel it's a touch overwhelming. I would suggest you consider getting rid of the "success stories" of internet riches and instead launch right into what you can do for me and why I should believe you. Strong, strong recommendation: get rid of the scored-through descending prices. I don't think many people really believe that it was offered for sale - or even was actually considered to be offered - at all those different price points. A short price-justification paragraph comparing the cost to some other expenses would be much more effective. (NB I didn't buy Microsoft Office. It came pre-installed on my PC. I don't know how many people do or do not go out and buy Office so I can't say whether it's a good example.) "Lessons" imply work. And work is bad, even though you say success isn't overnight (good call, IMO). Changing it to "steps" as Mobosorous suggested, or even just videos / modules / sections might test better. And, lastly, be wary of offering too many bonuses without explaining why they're all relevant. Bonus 3 especially has me a little confused because I don't even know what it is. (I know you said the section wasn't complete.) But still, the descriptions of the bonuses is inconsistent in length and format - did you, by any chance, get them from different sources and just use the copy they came with? I know I didn't really go into a lot of detail about most of the actual copy... but still I hope my initial impressions are useful to you. Good luck. Actually, one more thing: careful with the earnings screenshot. The FTC's a-prowling ![]() Gil-Ad |
|
Gil-Ad Schwartz
| |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| appreciated, critique, needed, provide |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |