My first EVER Squeeze Page (Critique)

12 years ago

This is good, man. Simple, basic, pointer arrows, can't go wrong!

Thanks

Signature

The good thing about this business is that "People don't succeed cause they aim too high and miss, no, they aim too low... and hit. Most people don't aim at all." (Les Brown)

Not us... Not marketers. We live far above mediocrity. Always keep this in mind at all times..

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6960383].message }}

TerranceCharles

12 years ago

Looks damn good James, and don't worry about the copyright. You can always put copyright 20lbsofmuscle.com - If anything, you could maybe tweak the title a little bit more to give a better description with benefits

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

GOOD Solo Ads from Terrance | Real Targeted Traffic That BUY | Need I.M. Coaching / Consulting? | Blog

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6960407].message }}

jamescanz

12 years ago

Originally Posted by marketforus1

This is good, man. Simple, basic, pointer arrows, can't go wrong!

Originally Posted by TerranceCharles

Looks damn good James, and don't worry about the copyright. You can always put copyright 20lbsofmuscle.com - If anything, you could maybe tweak the title a little bit more to give a better description with benefits

Thanks guys!

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6960462].message }}

Cool Hand Luke

12 years ago

Originally Posted by TerranceCharles

Looks damn good James, and don't worry about the copyright. You can always put copyright 20lbsofmuscle.com - If anything, you could maybe tweak the title a little bit more to give a better description with benefits

You are confusing copywrite and copyright. They do not mean the same thing.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6961752].message }}

superpayouts 12 years ago

Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke

You are confusing copywrite and copyright. They do not mean the same thing.

Your the only one talking about copywrite here. Im pretty sure we all know there's a difference. lol.
- Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6961761].message }}
- Cool Hand Luke 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by superpayouts
  
  Your the only one talking about copywrite here. Im pretty sure we all know there's a difference. lol.
  
  Reading comprehension (and spelling) is clearly not your strong suit.
  
  [ 1 ] Thanks
  
  1 reply
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6962081].message }}
  
  IM Lover 12 years ago
  
  Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke
  
  Reading comprehension (and spelling) is clearly not your strong suit.
  
  Made me chuckle thanks. On Topic, I think it looks great, nice and simple. Good job!.
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6962152].message }}

jojohn07

12 years ago

This is good, man. Simple, basic, pointer arrows, can't go wrong!

Thanks

Signature

This is my first site niche: www.android-tv.fr

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6962468].message }}

wlasikiewicz

12 years ago

Sometimes the simpler method is the best. I think it looks good, just split test it and see what works for you.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Build a Profitable & Professional email list.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6962474].message }}

jamescanz

12 years ago

Originally Posted by wlasikiewicz

Sometimes the simpler method is the best. I think it looks good, just split test it and see what works for you.

Thanks everyone.

When it comes to split testing, do I just make another page and switch up the headlines, maybe colors or opt in box, and basically test one for X amount of days and then switch to the other one for X amount of days?

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6964246].message }}

Andrew Gould

12 years ago

Originally Posted by jamescanz

When it comes to split testing, do I just make another page and switch up the headlines, maybe colors or opt in box, and basically test one for X amount of days and then switch to the other one for X amount of days?

For a basic A/B split test, make a copy of the page you want to improve and change one element of it. The original page is called the control, the copy is called the test.

Looking at your page, I think the easiest test to start with would be the headline - at the moment it's focused on the promise, I'd test focusing on the problem.

Then you use split testing software to run both at the same time - half your traffic being sent to the control, the other half to the test. You don't want to run one after the other because external factors that might be present one week, but not the next, can affect conversion (holidays, product launches, etc).

Sooner or later, depending on the amount of traffic you're getting, one page will win and that will be your new control. Be careful not to stop the test as soon as one page moves ahead - you want to wait for the result to be statistically significant, meaning the result is not down to chance.

Then rinse and repeat.

When you get more experienced, and if you've got the traffic, you can test more than one variation and even more than one element (multivariate testing).

P.S. There's a recent thread with split testing software recommendations here:

http://www.warriorforum.com/copywrit...o-you-use.html

[ 3 ] Thanks

Signature

Andrew Gould

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6965437].message }}

SethTheUBotGuy

12 years ago

I bit. Lol. Good work!

Thanks

Signature

UBot Studio - Sell Products, Make Money, and Automate your Marketing

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6963790].message }}

TheBeautifulMinds

12 years ago

That squeeze page is looking good, James.
I like your design it's a simple and professional looking design, that's all you need.

Thanks

Signature

Need-Articles.com - Premium Article Writing Service!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6965637].message }}

Steve The Copywriter

12 years ago

Yes it's a great squeeze page. It's very unusual for the headline alone (and the copy on the book graphics) to hit the target bang on, without having to use bullets as well.

Hitting a target without bullets - whatever next?

Although, it's another thing you can test.

Good luck, but with lots of targeted traffic I don't think you'll need any luck, it should to be a winner.

Steve

Thanks

Signature

http://www.warriorforum.com/warriors...right-now.html

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6965672].message }}

bigrayban

12 years ago

looking good mate

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6968245].message }}

james4078

12 years ago

Simple, uncluttered and right to the point.
Not bad for your first one.
Are you planning on making more with different approaches?

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6968295].message }}

shifat

12 years ago

Looks good james

!BTW you used optimizepress to built that opt in,right?

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6968566].message }}

jamescanz

12 years ago

Originally Posted by Andrew Gould

For a basic A/B split test, make a copy of the page you want to improve and change one element of it. The original page is called the control, the copy is called the test.

Looking at your page, I think the easiest test to start with would be the headline - at the moment it's focused on the promise, I'd test focusing on the problem.

Then you use split testing software to run both at the same time - half your traffic being sent to the control, the other half to the test. You don't want to run one after the other because external factors that might be present one week, but not the next, can affect conversion (holidays, product launches, etc).

Sooner or later, depending on the amount of traffic you're getting, one page will win and that will be your new control. Be careful not to stop the test as soon as one page moves ahead - you want to wait for the result to be statistically significant, meaning the result is not down to chance.

Then rinse and repeat.

When you get more experienced, and if you've got the traffic, you can test more than one variation and even more than one element (multivariate testing).

P.S. There's a recent thread with split testing software recommendations here:

http://www.warriorforum.com/copywrit...o-you-use.html

Awesome input, greatly appreciated

Originally Posted by TheBeautifulMinds

That squeeze page is looking good, James.
I like your design it's a simple and professional looking design, that's all you need.

Originally Posted by bigrayban

looking good mate

Thanks!

Originally Posted by james4078

Simple, uncluttered and right to the point.
Not bad for your first one.
Are you planning on making more with different approaches?

In the future, yup. At the moment, I need to stop spending so much time on the specifics and get some traffic to it.

Originally Posted by shifat

Looks good james

!BTW you used optimizepress to built that opt in,right?

Yup yup!

I love optimize press. It would have taken me about 100 days and 100 more dollars to create what I did there in a couple of hours.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6970877].message }}

My first EVER Squeeze Page (Critique)

Trending Topics

Been a while! Any of you Old Timers here?

How much does the rebranding affect CR ?

Are billboards still effective in driving customers?

Boat and Jet Ski Rentals...... Door Hangers Effective?

A Very Strange Internet Problem